The effect of HMG and recombinant human FSH on oocyte quality: A randomized single-blind clinical trial

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 120, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 190-194

  Rashidi, Batool Hossein ^a   Sarvi, Fatemeh ^a   Tehrani, Ensieh Shahrokh ^a   Zayeri, Farid ^a   Movahedin, Mansoureh ^a   Khanafshar, Navid ^a  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

HMG; ICSI; Oocyte quality; Ovarian stimulation; Recombinant human FSH

Indexed keywords

HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN; RECOMBINANT FOLLITROPIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPLASM; DEMOGRAPHY; DOWN REGULATION; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; FISHER EXACT TEST; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; METAPHASE; OOCYTE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANK SUM TEST; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; ZONA PELLUCIDA;

EID: 19744368855     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. E.M. Kolibianakis, C. Albano, and J. Kahn Exposure to high levels of luteinizing hormone and estradiol in the early follicular phase of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles is associated with a reduced chance of pregnancy Fertil Steril 79 2003 873 880
2. Recombinant Human FSH Study Group Clinical assessment of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in stimulating ovarian follicular development before in vitro fertilization Fertil Steril 63 1995 77 86
3. S. Daya, J. Gunby, and E.G. Hughes Follicle-stimulation hormone versus human menopausal gonadotropin for in vitro fertilization cycles: a meta-analysis Fertil Steril 64 1995 347 354
4. S. Daya, and J. Gunby Recombinant versus urinary follicle stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive Hum Reprod 14 1999 2207 2215
5. R. Agarwal, J. Holmes, and H.S. Jacobs Follicle-stimulating hormone or human menopausal gonadotropin for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization cycles: a meta-analysis Fertil Steril 73 2000 338 343
6. Z. Kilani, A. Dakkak, and S. Ghunaim A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing highly purified HMG with recombinant FSH in women undergoing ICSI: ovarian response and clinical outcome Hum Reprod 18 2003 1194 1199
7. E. Strehler, M. Abt, I. El-Danasouri, M. De Santo, and K. Sterzik Impact of recombinant follicle-stimulation hormone and human menopausal gonadotropins on in vitro fertilization outcome Fertil Steril 75 2001 332 336
8. J. Balasch, J. Penarrubia, and F. Fabregues Ovarian responses to recombinant FSH or HMG in normogonadotropic women following pituitary desensitization by a depot GnRH agonist for assisted reproduction Reprod Biomed 7 2003 35 42 (online)
9. E.H. Ng, E.Y. Lau, W.S. Yeung, and P.C. Ho HMG is as good as recombinant human FSH in term of oocyte and embryo quality: a prospective randomized trial Hum Reprod 16 2001 319 325
10. B. Imthurn, E. Macas, and M. Rosselli Nuclear maturity and oocyte morphology after stimulation with highly purified follicle stimulation hormone compared to human menopausal gonadotropin Hum Reprod 11 1996 2386 2391
11. L. Regan, E.J. Owen, and H.S. Jacobs Hypersecretion of luteinizing hormone, infertility and miscarriage Lancet 36 1990 1141 1144
12. T. Kinoshita, K. Ootaka, and M. Ito Delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to human menopausal gonadotropin Obstet Gynaecol Res 25 1999 437 438
13. S. Jacob, L. Drudy, and R. Conroy Outcome from consecutive in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection attempts in the final group treated with urinary gonadotropins and the first group treated with recombinant follicle stimulation hormone Hum Reprod 13 1998 1783 1787
14. H. Abdalla, and M.Y. Thum An elevated basal FSH reflects a quantitative rather than qualitative decline of the ovarian reserve Hum Reprod 19 4 2004 893 898
15. M.T. Zenzes, T.R. Reed, and R.F. Casper Effects of cigarette smoking and age on the maturation of human oocyte Hum Reprod 12 1997 1736 1741
16. N. Garrido, A. Pellicer, J. Remohi, and C. Simon Uterine and ovarian function in endometriosis Semin Reprod Med 21 2 2003 183 192
17. H. Saito, T. Seino, T. Kaneko, K. Nakahara, M. Toya, and H. Karachi Endometriosis and oocyte quality Gynecol Obstet Invest 53 2002 46 51
18. E. Tavmergen, E.N. Goker, F. Sendag, H. Sendag, and R. Levi Comparison of short and long ovulation response and outcome of pregnancy Arch Gynecol Obstet 266 1 2002 5 11
19. F. Akagbosu, S. Marcus, and N. Abusheikha Does ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome affect the quality of oocytes? Hum Reprod 13 1998 2583 2584
20. P.F. Serhal, D.M. Ranieri, and A. Kinis Oocyte morphology predicts outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection Hum Reprod 12 1997 1267 1270
21. B. Balaban, B. Urman, and A. Sertac Oocyte morphology does not affect fertilization rate, embryo quality and implantation rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection Hum Reprod 13 1998 3431 3433
22. N.R. Stoddart, and S.D. Fleming Orientation of the first polar body at 6 or 12 O'clock during ICSI does not affect clinical outcome Hum Reprod 15 2000 1580 1585
23. M.P. Teissier, H. Chable, and S. Paulhac Recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone versus human menopausal gonadotrophin induction: effects in mature follicle endocrinology Hum Reprod 14 1999 2236 2241
24. A. Alisch, K. Ruping, F. Koster, and B. Schopper Cumulus cell apoptosis as a predictor for oocyte quality in artificial reproduction technique Zentralbl Gynakol 125 11 2003 452 457
25. V. Vlaisavljevic, M. Reljic, V. Gavric Lovrec, D. Zazula, and N. Sergent Measurement of perifollicular blood flow of the dominant preovulatory follicle using three-dimentional power Doppler Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22 5 2003 520 526
26. W.T. Garside, L.J.R. De Mola, and J.A. Bucci Sequential analysis of zona thickness during in vitro culture of human zygotes: correlation with embryo quality, age and implantation Mol Reprod Dev 47 1997 99 104
27. T. Ebner, C. Yaman, and M. Moser Prognostic value of first polar body morphology on fertilization rate and embryo quality in intracytoplasmic sperm injection Hum Reprod 15 2000 427 430