Laboratory evaluation of the improved tube test detection limits for β-lactam residues in Kenyan milk

African Journal of Biotechnology

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 82-87

  Shitandi, Anakalo ^a   Kihumbu, Gathoni ^b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b EGERTON UNIVERSITY   (Kenya)

Author keywords

Improved tube test; Kenyan milk; Maximum residue limits; lactams

Indexed keywords

AMOXICILLIN; AMPICILLIN; BETA LACTAM ANTIBIOTIC; CEFALEXIN; CEFAPIRIN; CEFTIOFUR; OXACILLIN; PENICILLIN G;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL INFECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DAIRY CATTLE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KENYA; LABORATORY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MILK; NONHUMAN; SCREENING TEST; TUBE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 19744367696     PISSN: 16845315     EISSN: 16845315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5897/ajb2004.000-2015     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Agresti A (2002 ). Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd Edition. Publishers Wiley-Interscience. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.USA, pp. 193-297.
2. Aviva P, Watson P (1999). Logit Models for an Ordinal Response. In. Statistics for Veterinary & Animal Science. Blackwell Science Ltd.109-113, pp. 101-111.
3. Charles S, Gary G, Maura E (2001). Loglinear Models. In. Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System. Publishers Wiley-Interscience. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.USA, pp. 193-297.
4. Codex Alimentarius (1993). Residues of veterinary Drugs in Foods, Volume 3, Second Edition. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, FAO, Rome.
5. th session, Budapest, Hungary, Criteria for evaluating acceptable methods for codex purposes.
6. Elliott C, Kenedy G, McCaughey J (1998.) Methods for the detection of polyether ionophore residues in poultry. Analyst 123: 45-56.
7. Honakanen - Buzalski T, Reybroeck W (1997). Antimicrobials. In residues and contaminants in milk and milk products. International Dairy Federation, Brussels, Belgium; ref. S.I. 9701, pp. 26-34.
8. International dairy Federation (IDF) Group E503 (1997). Guidance for the standardized description of microbial inhibitor tests. Discussion in IDF-group 201 Statistics and E503 in Lisbon.
9. Jevinova P, Dudrikova E, Sokol J, Nagy J, Mate D, Pipova M, Cabadaj R. (2003). Determination of oxytetracycline residues in milk with the use of HPLC method and two microbial inhibition methods. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy. 47: 211-216.
10. Mandell G, Perti W (1996). Antimicrobial agents: penicillins, cephalosporins, and other β-lactam antibiotics. In: Hardman, G., Limbird, L., Molinoff, P. and Ruddon, R. eds. Goodman and Gilman's. The pharmacologic basis of therapeutics. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division, pp. 1073-10101.
11. Messer W, Leslie J, Houghtby G, Peeler J, Barnett J. 1982.Bacillus stearothermophilus disc assay for detection of inhibitors in milk. J. Assoc. Official Anal. Chem. 65 (5):1208-1214.
12. Mitchell J, Griffiths M, McEwen S, McNab W, Yee A. (1998). Antimicrobial drug residues in milk: causes, concerns, prevalence, regulations, tests, and test performance. J. Food Protect. 61: 742-756.
13. Nakazawa H, Fujita M, Horie M (1992). The Current Overview of Feed Additives and Veterinary Drugs and their Residual Analysis in Japan. In Analysis of Antibiotic/Drug Residues in Food Products of Animal Origin, edited by V.K.Agarwal (New York: Plenum Press), 1992, pp.187-196.
14. Nouws J, van Egmond H, Smulders H, Loeffen G, Schouten J, Stegeman H. (1999). A microbiological assay system for assesment of raw milk exceeding EU maximum residue levels. Int. Dairy J. 9: 85-90.
15. Ombui J, McDermott J, Arimi S, Mbugua S, Kakuko S, Kilungo K. (1995). Current and potential roles of dairy co-operative societies in Kiambu District, Kenya. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal.61(2):129-140.
16. Reybroeck W. (1995). Evaluation of screening tests for the detection of antimicrobial residues in milk. International Dairy Federation, Symposium on residues of antimicrobial drugs and other inhibitors in milk. Kiel, Germany, 28-31 August , pp. 182-186.
17. Rikilt-dlo (1998 a). Improved Dutch tube diffusion test. In the procedure of the method: Milk and milk products - Detection of inhibitors. Edition. 1. By Department of microbiology, state institute for quality control of agricultural products (Rikilt -dlo), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
18. SAS (SAS Institute, 2001). SAS for Windows (2001). SAS/STAT® computer packager.
19. SAS. Institute Inc.© (2001). Statistics version 6.12. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. 5 Willow Close, Bexley, Kent, GBDA5 1QY, England.
20. Senyk F, Davidson H, Brown J, Hallstead R., Sherbon W. 1990. Comparison of rapid tests used to detect antibiotic residues in milk. J. Food Protect. 53, 158-164.
21. Shitandi A, Sternesjö Å (2001).Detection of antmicrobial drug residues in Kenyan milk. J. Food Safety 21:pp. 205-214.
22. Sternesjö Å., Johnsson G. (1998). A Novel Rapid Enzyme Immunoassay (Fluorophos BetaScreen) for Detection of β-Lactam Residues in Ex-Farm Raw Milk. J. Food Prot. 61: pp. 808-811.
23. Suhren G, (1995). Proceedings of the symposium on residues of antimicrobial drugs and other inhibitors in milk, International Dairy Federation, Kiel, p. 51.
24. Suhren G, Beukers R. (1998). Delvotest SP for detection of cloxacillin and sulfamethoxazole in milk: IDF interlaboratory study. J. Assoc. Official Anal. Chem. 81, 978 - 990.