Trapped electrons in vacuum for a scalable quantum processor

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2004, Pages

  Ciaramicoli, G ^a   Marzoli, I ^a   Tombesi, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMERINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS; ELECTRODES; ELECTRON TRAPS; ESTIMATION; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS; VACUUM;

COULOMB INTERACTIONS; FOCK STATES; PENNING TRAPS; QUANTUM PROCESSORS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 19644401560     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.032301     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. For a review see the Quantum Computation Roadmap at the internet site http://qist.lanl.gov.
2. C. Monroe, D.M. Meekhof, B.E. King, W.M. Itano, and D.J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4714 (1995).
3. B. DeMarco, A. Ben-Kish, D. Leibfried, V. Meyer, M. Rowe, B.M. Jelenkovic, W.M. Itano, J. Britton, C. Langer, T. Rosenband, and D.J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 267901 (2002).
4. D. Leibfried, B. DeMarco, V. Meyer, D. Lucas, M. Barrett, J. Britton, W.M. Itano, B. Jelenkovic, C. Langer, T. Rosenband, and D.J. Wineland, Nature (London) 422, 412 (2003).
5. S. Guide, M. Riebe, G.P.T. Lancaster, C. Becher, J. Eschner, H. Häffner, F. Schmidt-Kaler, I.L. Chuang, and R. Blatt, Nature (London) 422, 48 (2003).
6. G. Ciaramicoli, I. Marzoli, and P. Tombesi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 017901 (2003).
7. S. Mancini, A.M. Martins, and P. Tombesi, Phys. Rev. A 61, 012303 (2000).
8. G. Ciaramicoli, I. Marzoli, and P. Tombesi, Phys. Rev. A 63, 052307 (2001).
9. G. Ciaramicoli, I. Marzoli, and P. Tombesi, J. Mod. Opt. 49, 1307 (2002).
10. L.S. Brown and G. Gabrielse, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 233 (1986).
11. S. Peil and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1287 (1999).
12. B. D'Urso, B. Odom, and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 043001 (2003).
13. M. Drndić, C.S. Lee, and R.M. Westervelt, Phys. Rev. B 63, 085321 (2001).
14. J.I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995).
15. J.I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Nature (London) 404, 579 (2000).
16. B.E. Kane, Nature (London) 393, 133 (1998).
17. D. Loss and D.P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998).
18. D.J. Heinzen and D.J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. A 42, 2977 (1990).
19. Mesoscopic Electron Transport, edited by L.L. Sohn, L.P. Kouwenhoven, and G. Schon (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996).
20. F.M. Penning, Physica (Amsterdam) 3, 873 (1936).
21. J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1975).
22. E. Durand, Électrostatique-Problèmes Généraux Conducteurs (Massen et Cie, Paris, 1966).
23. z or in a pure Fock state. Typically the magnetron quantum number changes in a time much larger than the decoherence time of the axial motion. Hence the above conditions assure the possibility to act on specific axial transitions without populating other energy states.
24. B.H. Bransden and C.J. Joachain, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (Longman Scientific and Technical, London, 1989).
25. This sequence consists of three CNOT gates, in which the two qubits play alternatively the role of the control and of the target.
26. Q.A. Turchette, D. Kielpinski, B.E. King, D. Leibfried, D.M. Meekhof, C.J. Myatt, M.A. Rowe, C.A. Sackett, C.S. Wood, W.M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D.J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. A 61, 063418 (2000).
27. C. Henkel, S. Pötting, and M. Wilkens, Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 69, 379 (1999).
28. T.A. Savard, K.M. O'Hara, and J.E. Thomas, Phys. Rev. A 56, R1095 (1997).
29. C.W. Gardiner, Quantum Noise (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991).
30. G. Gabrielse and J.N. Tan, in Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics, edited by P. Berman (Academic Press, New York, 1994).
31. D.P. DiVincenzo, Fortschr. Phys. 48, 771 (2000).
32. A.M. Childs and I.L. Chuang, Phys. Rev. A 63, 012306 (2001).