Even parity Θ pentaquark and stable antistrange nuclear matter

Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2004, Pages

  Miller, Gerald A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 19644400575     PISSN: 05562813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.70.022202     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. D. Diakonov, V. Petrov, and M. V. Polyakov, Z. Phys. A 359, 305 (1997).
2. T. Nakano et al. [LEPS Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 012002 (2003).
3. V. V. Barmin et al. [DIANA Collaboration], Phys. At. Nucl. 66, 1715 (2003).
4. S. Stepanyan et al. [CLAS Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 252001 (2003).
5. J. Barth et al. [SAPHIR Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 572, 127 (2003).
6. V. Kubarovsky et al. [CLAS Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 032001 (2004); 92, E049902 (2004).
7. V. Kubarovsky et al. [CLAS Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 032001 (2004); 92, E049902 (2004).
8. A. Airapetian et al. [HERMES Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 042003 (2004).
9. A. Aleev et al. [SVD Collaboration], hep-ex/0401024.
10. C. Alt et al. [NA49 Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 042003 (2004).
11. S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 232002 (2003); J. Sugiyama, T. Doi, and M. Oka, Phys. Lett. B 581, 167 (2004); see also R. D. Matheus, et al., ibid. 578, 323 (2004).
12. S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 232002 (2003); J. Sugiyama, T. Doi, and M. Oka, Phys. Lett. B 581, 167 (2004); see also R. D. Matheus, et al., ibid. 578, 323 (2004).
13. S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 232002 (2003); J. Sugiyama, T. Doi, and M. Oka, Phys. Lett. B 581, 167 (2004); see also R. D. Matheus, et al., ibid. 578, 323 (2004).
14. F. Csikor, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and T. G. Kovacs, J. High Energy Phys. 0311, 070 (2003).
15. R. N. Cahn and G. H. Trilling, Phys. Rev. D 69, 011501 (2004); R. A. Arndt, I. I. Strakovsky, and R. L. Workman, Phys. Rev. C 68, 042201 (2003); 69, 019901 (2004); J. Haidenbauer and G. Krein, ibid. 68, 052201 (2003); S. Nussinov, hep-ph/0307357.
16. R. N. Cahn and G. H. Trilling, Phys. Rev. D 69, 011501 (2004); R. A. Arndt, I. I. Strakovsky, and R. L. Workman, Phys. Rev. C 68, 042201 (2003); 69, 019901 (2004); J. Haidenbauer and G. Krein, ibid. 68, 052201 (2003); S. Nussinov, hep-ph/0307357.
17. R. N. Cahn and G. H. Trilling, Phys. Rev. D 69, 011501 (2004); R. A. Arndt, I. I. Strakovsky, and R. L. Workman, Phys. Rev. C 68, 042201 (2003); 69, 019901 (2004); J. Haidenbauer and G. Krein, ibid. 68, 052201 (2003); S. Nussinov, hep-ph/0307357.
18. R. N. Cahn and G. H. Trilling, Phys. Rev. D 69, 011501 (2004); R. A. Arndt, I. I. Strakovsky, and R. L. Workman, Phys. Rev. C 68, 042201 (2003); 69, 019901 (2004); J. Haidenbauer and G. Krein, ibid. 68, 052201 (2003); S. Nussinov, hep-ph/0307357.
19. R. N. Cahn and G. H. Trilling, Phys. Rev. D 69, 011501 (2004); R. A. Arndt, I. I. Strakovsky, and R. L. Workman, Phys. Rev. C 68, 042201 (2003); 69, 019901 (2004); J. Haidenbauer and G. Krein, ibid. 68, 052201 (2003); S. Nussinov, hep-ph/0307357.
20. M. Karliner and H. J. Lipkin, Phys. Lett. B 586, 303 (2004). See also N. Auerbach and V. Zelevinsky, Phys. Lett. B 590, 45 (2004).
21. M. Karliner and H. J. Lipkin, Phys. Lett. B 586, 303 (2004). See also N. Auerbach and V. Zelevinsky, Phys. Lett. B 590, 45 (2004).
22. B. K. Jennings and K. Maltman, Phys. Rev. D 69, 094020 (2004).
23. R. L. Jaffe and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 232003 (2003).
24. E. Shuryak and I. Zahed, Phys. Lett. B 589, 21 (2004).
25. G. E. Brown, in Unified Models of Nuclear Structure (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1964); G. E. Brown and M. Bolsterli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 472 (1959).
26. G. E. Brown, in Unified Models of Nuclear Structure (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1964); G. E. Brown and M. Bolsterli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 472 (1959).
27. A. W. Thomas, K. Hicks, and A. Hosaka, Prog. Theor. Phys. 111, 291 (2004).
28. C. Hanhart et al., Phys. Lett. B 590, 39 (2004).
29. N. Isgur and G. Karl, Phys. Rev. D 18, 4187 (1978).
30. Our model treats the pseudoscalar excitations, n, as a set of point-like elementary particles. Hence the effects of two-gluon exchange with the nucleon also vanish due to the color singlet nature of n.
31. S. Théberge, A. W. Thomas, and G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2838 (1980); 22, 2106 (1981); A. W. Thomas, S. Théberge, and G. A. Miller, ibid. 24, 216 (1981); G. A. Miller, A. W. Thomas, and S. Théberge, Phys. Lett. 91B, 192 (1980).
32. S. Théberge, A. W. Thomas, and G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2838 (1980); 22, 2106 (1981); A. W. Thomas, S. Théberge, and G. A. Miller, ibid. 24, 216 (1981); G. A. Miller, A. W. Thomas, and S. Théberge, Phys. Lett. 91B, 192 (1980).
33. S. Théberge, A. W. Thomas, and G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2838 (1980); 22, 2106 (1981); A. W. Thomas, S. Théberge, and G. A. Miller, ibid. 24, 216 (1981); G. A. Miller, A. W. Thomas, and S. Théberge, Phys. Lett. 91B, 192 (1980).
34. S. Théberge, A. W. Thomas, and G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2838 (1980); 22, 2106 (1981); A. W. Thomas, S. Théberge, and G. A. Miller, ibid. 24, 216 (1981); G. A. Miller, A. W. Thomas, and S. Théberge, Phys. Lett. 91B, 192 (1980).
35. G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. C 66, 032201 (2002).
36. An exchange term that occurs if P=P′ corresponds to a set of zero measure and does not contribute to scattering.
37. Θ would be small, and p-P would be the correct relative momentum. Here the residual interaction is strong. Keeping such effects in the transformation between frames is a relativistic effect that is ignored here.
38. W. Bruckner et al., Phys. Lett. 55B, 107 (1975).
39. Difficulties in computing the spectrum abound in many models [14] See also T. D. Cohen, hep-ph/0402056; hep-ph/0312191.