Fano factor reduction on the 0.7 conductance structure of a ballistic one-dimensional wire

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 11, 2004, Pages

  Roche, P ^a   Segala J ^a   Glattli, D C ^a,d   Nicholls, J T ^b   Pepper, M ^c   Graham, A C ^c   Thomas, K J ^c   Simmons, M Y ^c,e   Ritchie, D A ^c  

^a SERVICE DE PHYSIQUE DE L ETAT CONDENSÉ   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^d LABORATOIRE DE PHYSIQUE STATISTIQUE   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC CONDUCTANCE; ELECTRIC CURRENTS; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRON GAS; FABRICATION; MAGNETIC FIELDS; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; OSCILLATIONS; SPURIOUS SIGNAL NOISE;

CONDUCTION CHANNELS; FANO FACTOR REDUCTION; NOISE MEASUREMENTS; SPLIT-GATE DEVICES;

ELECTRIC WIRE;

EID: 19644392086     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.116602     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. B. J. van Wees et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 848 (1988).
2. D. A. Wharam et al., J. Phys. C 21, L209 (1988).
3. K. J. Thomas et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 135 (1996).
4. K. J. Thomas et al., Phys. Rev. B 58, 4846 (1998).
5. A. Kristensen et al., Phys. Rev. B 62, 10950 (2000).
6. D. J. Reilly et al., Phys. Rev. B 63, 121311 (2001).
7. Y. Meir, K. Hirose, and N. S. Wingreen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 196802 (2002).
8. S. M. Cronenwett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 226805 (2002).
9. C. K. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. B 54, 14257 (1996); A. A. Starikov et al., Phys. Rev. B 67, 235319 (2003).
10. C. K. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. B 54, 14257 (1996); A. A. Starikov et al., Phys. Rev. B 67, 235319 (2003).
11. H. Bruus et al., Physica (Amsterdam) 10E, 97 (2001).
12. K. Hirose et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 026804 (2003); K. A. Matveev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 106801 (2004).
13. K. Hirose et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 026804 (2003); K. A. Matveev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 106801 (2004).
14. R. C. Liu et al., Nature (London) 391, 263 (1998).
15. N. Y. Kim et al., cond-mat/0311435; W. D. Oliver, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 2002.
16. N. Y. Kim et al., cond-mat/0311435; W. D. Oliver, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 2002.
17. G. B. Lesovik, JETP Lett. 49, 594 (1989).
18. M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2901 (1990).
19. T. Martin and R. Landauer, Phys. Rev. B 45, 1742 (1992).
20. M. Reznikov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3340 (1995).
21. A. Kumar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2778 (1996).
22. M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B 46, 12 485 (1992).
23. 0. We believe this unwanted resonance is not responsible for the observed reduction of the partition noise, nor for the nonlinearities.