Assimilation in existing and novel German compounds

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 465-488

  Gumnior, Heidi ^a   Zwitserlood, Pienie ^a   Bölte, Jens ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSONANT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; GERMANY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONEME; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ARTICULATION; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 19644366200     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960444002174     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Archangeli, D. (1988). Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology, 5, 183-207.
2. Baumann, H., Nagengast, J., & Wittenburg, P. (1992). A new experimental set-up tool for experiments in the nineties. Paper presented at the International Congress of Social Science Information Technology. Amsterdam, NL.
3. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 57, 289-300.
4. Bölte, J. (2001). Graded lexical activation in cross-modal semantic priming: Spreading of activation, backward priming, or repair? In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Society. Edinburgh, UK.
5. Bölte, J., & Coenen, E. (2002). Is phonological information mapped onto semantic information in a one-to-one manner? Brain and Language, 81, 384-397.
6. Burani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1987). Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 217-227.
7. Coenen, E., Zwitserlood, P., & Bölte, J. (2001). Variation and assimilation in German: Consequences for lexical access and representation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 535-564.
8. Conine, M. C., Blasko, D. G., & Titone, D. (1993). Do the beginnings of words have a special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 193-210.
9. Frauenfelder, U. H., & Schreuder, R. (1992). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In G. Booji & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1991 (pp. 165-183). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
10. Gaskell, M. G. (2003). Modelling regressive and progressive effects of assimilation in speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 447-463.
11. Gaskell, M. G., Hare, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1995). A connectionist model of phonological representation in speech perception. Cognitive Science, 19, 407-439.
12. Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1996). Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 144-158.
13. Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1998). Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and Performance, 24, 380-396.
14. Gow, D. W. (2001). Assimilation and anticipation in continuous spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 133-159.
15. Kerswill, P. E. (1985). A sociophonetic study of connected speech processes in Cambridge English: An outline and some results. Cambridge Papers in Phonetics and Experimental Linguistics, 4, 1-39.
16. Kiparsky, P. (1985). Some consequences of lexical phonology. Phonology, 2, 85-138.
17. Kohler, K. J. (1992). Phonetisch-akustische Datenbasis des Hochdeutschen: Kieler Arbeiten zu den PhonDat-Projekten 1989-1992. Arbeitsberichte. Institut für Phonetik, Universität Kiel. Kiel.
18. Lahiri, A. (1995). Undoing place assimilation. Paper presented at the 129th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America. Washington, DC.
19. Lahiri, A., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1991). The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition, 38, 245-294.
20. Lahiri, A., & Reetz, H. (2002). Underspecified Recognition. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Werner (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology VII, (pp. 637-675). Berlin: Mouton.
21. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1993). Issues of process and representation in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann & R. Shillock (Eds.), Cognitive models of language processes: The second Sperlonga meeting (pp. 187-210). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
22. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Moss, H. E., & van Halen, S. (1996). Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1376-1392.
23. Marslen-Wilson, W., Nix, A., & Gaskell, G. (1995). Phonological variation in lexical access: Abstractness, inference and English place assimilation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 285-308.
24. Mitterer, H. (2003). Understanding "gardembench". Studies on the perception of assimilated word forms. Published doctoral dissertation, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands.
25. Nolan, F. (1992). The descriptive role of segments: Evidence from assimilation. In G. J. Doherty & D. R. Ladd (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody, (pp. 261-280). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Pfeiffer, N. (2003). Regressive Ortsassimilation bei Wort- und Pseudowortkomposita. Unpublished Masters thesis, University of Münster, Germany.
27. Pierrehumbert, J. (2002). Word-specific phonetics. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Werner (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology VII (pp. 101-140). Berlin: Mouton.
28. Pulleyblank, D. (1988). Vocalic underspecification in Yoruba. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 233-270.
29. Radeau, M., Morais, J., & Segui, J. (1995). Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1297-1311.
30. Schriefers, H., Zwitserlood, P., & Roloefs, A. (1991). The identification of morphologically complex spoken words: Continuous processing or decomposition? Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 26-47.
31. Tyler, L. K., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Rentoul, J., & Hanney, P. (1988). Continuous and discontinuous access in spoken word-recognition: The role of derivational prefixes. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 368-381.