Distinguishability of maximally entangled states

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2004, Pages

  Ghosh, Sibasish ^a   Kar, Guruprasad ^a   Roy, Anirban ^a   Sarkar, Debasis ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALCUTTA   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENTROPY; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MEASUREMENT THEORY; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; SET THEORY; STANDARDS; THEOREM PROVING;

BIPARTITE QUANTUM STATE; ENTANGLED STATES; LOCAL OPERATIONS AND CLASSICAL COMMUNICATION (LOCC); TELEPORTATION PROTOCOL;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 19544391051     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.022304     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, C. A. Fuchs, T. Mor, E. Rains, P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1070 (1999).
2. J. Walgate, A. J. Short, L. Hardy, and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4972 (2000).
3. J. Walgate and L. Hardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 147901 (2002).
4. S. Ghosh, G. Kar, A. Roy, A. S. Sen (De), and U. Sen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 277902 (2001).
5. In Ref. [6] , a sufficient condition has been provided for local discrimination of l number of pairwise orthogonal states, taken from (2), for prime dimension d.
6. H. Fan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 177905 (2004).
7. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Josza, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
8. S. L. Braunstein, G. M. D'Ariano, G. J. Milburn, and M. F. Sacchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3486 (2000).
9. V. Vedral, M. B. Plenio, M. A. Rippin, and P. L. Knight, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2275 (1997).
10. V. Vedral and M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. A 57, 1619 (1998).
11. E. M. Rains, Phys. Rev. A 60, 179 (1999).
12. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2014 (2000).
13. M. Horodecki, A. S. De, U. Sen (De), and K. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 047902 (2003).
14. R. F. Werner, J. Phys. A 34, 7081 (2001).
15. jk, for j, k=0, 1, 2, 3, one can verify that the above-mentioned orthogonality conditions will always give rise to a contradiction.