Testing the standard model with Bs0→K +K- decays

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2004, Pages

  London, David ^a,b   Matias, Joaquim ^c  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; PHYSICS; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 19544390689     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.031502     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C.T. Sachrajda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1914 (1999); Nucl. Phys. B591, 313 (2000); B606, 245 (2001).
2. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C.T. Sachrajda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1914 (1999); Nucl. Phys. B591, 313 (2000); B606, 245 (2001).
3. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C.T. Sachrajda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1914 (1999); Nucl. Phys. B591, 313 (2000); B606, 245 (2001).
4. M. Beneke and M. Neubert, Nucl. Phys. B675, 333 (2003).
5. A.J. Buras, R. Fleischer, S. Recksiegel, and F. Schwab, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 101804 (2004); hep-ph/0402112.
6. C.W. Bauer, D. Pirjol, I.Z. Rothstein, and I.W. Stewart, hep-ph/0401188. See this paper for references about soft-collinear effective theory.
7. R. Fleischer, Eur. Phys. J. C 16, 87 (2000).
8. M. Gronau, O.F. Hernández, D. London, and J.L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 50, 4529 (1994); 52, 6374 (1995).
9. M. Gronau, O.F. Hernández, D. London, and J.L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 50, 4529 (1994); 52, 6374 (1995).
10. R. Fleischer, Phys. Lett. B 459, 306 (1999).
11. M. Beneke, eConf C0304052, FO001, 2003.
12. R. Fleischer and J. Matias, Phys. Rev. D 61, 074004 (2000).
13. R. Fleischer and J. Matias, Phys. Rev. D 66, 054009 (2002).
14. M. Gronau, Phys. Lett. B 492, 297 (2000); M. Gronau and J.L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 65, 113008 (2002).
15. M. Gronau, Phys. Lett. B 492, 297 (2000); M. Gronau and J.L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 65, 113008 (2002).
16. Particle Data Group Collaboration, K. Hagiwara et al., Phys. Rev. D 66, 010001 (2002).
17. A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, and M. Melcher, Phys. Rev. D 68, 114007 (2003).
18. d = 133°, see R. Fleischer, G. Isidori, and J. Matias, J. High Energy Phys. 05, 053 (2003).
19. M. Battaglia et al., hep-ph/0304132.
20. M. Gronau and J.L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 65, 093012 (2002).
21. The assumed size of SU(3) breaking in d′/d and θ′ - θ is smaller than that found for |C′/C| in Eq. (14). This is because all factorizable SU(3)-breaking effects cancel in the ratio d′/d, leaving only nonfactorizable corrections. SU(3) breaking in |C′/C| is expected to be larger since both factorizable and nonfactorizable terms are present.
22. H. Jawahery, talk given at Lepton-Photon 2003, Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, 2003, http://conferences.fnal.gov/lp2003.
23. Belle Collaboration, K. Abe et al., hep-ex/0401029.
24. J. Fry, talk given at Lepton-Photon 2003, Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, 2003, http://conferences.fnal.gov/lp2003; CDF web page http://www-cdf.fnal.gov/ physics/new/bottom/ 030529.blessed-bhh/blessed-bhh/blessed-bhh.html