Imaging after a Whipple operation: Improving visibility of the afferent jejunal loop in spiral computed tomography using biliary contrast medium

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 394-400

  Stumpp, Patrick ^a   Klöppel, Rainer ^b   Kahn, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b KLINIKUM CHEMNITZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Abdominal radiography; Computed tomography; Contrast media; Pancreas surgery; Pancreaticojejunostomy

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; TUMORS; VISIBILITY;

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIUM; OPACIFICATION; PANCREAS/SURGERY; PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; SEMI-QUANTITATIVE EVALUATIONS; SIEMENS; SPIRAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIES; TUMOR RECURRENCES;

CONTRAST MEDIA;

BARIUM SULFATE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOMEPROL; MEGLUMINE IOTROXATE;

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HEPATOBILIARY SYSTEM; HUMAN; JEJUNOSTOMY; JEJUNUM; MALE; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TUMOR RECURRENCE; VISIBILITY;

EID: 19544387604     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000162821.16533.7f     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL. Alternative techniques for performing the Whipple operation. Adv Surg. 1996;30:293-310.
2. Bluemke DA, Abrams RA, Yeo CJ, et al. Recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT evaluation following the Whipple procedure. Radiographics. 1997;17:303-313.
3. Bluemke DA, Fishman EK, Kuhlman J. CT evaluation following Whipple procedure: potential pitfalls in interpretation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992;16:704-708.
4. Abildgaard A, Kolmannskog F, Mathisen O, et al. Computed tomography after modified Whipple procedure with pancreatic duct occlusion. Acta Radiol. 1990;31:579-584.
5. Coombs RJ, Zeiss J, Howard JM, et al. CT of the abdomen after the Whipple procedure: value in depicting postoperative anatomy, surgical complications, and tumor recurrence. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154: 1011-1014.
6. Lepanto L, Gianfelice D, Dery R, et al. Postoperative changes, complications, and recurrent disease after Whipple's operation: CT features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:841-846.
7. Heiken JP, Balfe DM, Picus D, et al. Radical pancreatectomy: postoperative evaluation by CT. Radiology. 1984;153:211-215.
8. Mortelé KJ, Lemmerling M, de Hemptinne B, et al. Postoperative findings following the Whipple procedure: determination of prevalence and morphologic abdominal CT features. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:123-128.
9. Johnson PT, Curry CA, Urban BA, et al. Spiral CT following the Whipple procedure: distinguishing normal postoperative findings from complications. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002;26:956-961.
10. Gervais DA, Fernandez-del Castillo C, O'Neill MJ, et al. Complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: imaging and imaging-guided interventional procedures. Radiographics. 2001;21:673-690.
11. Meyers MO, Meszoely IM, Hoffman JP, et al. Is reporting of recurrence data important in pancreatic cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11:304-309.
12. Dinkel HP, Moll R, Gassel HJ, et al. Helical CT cholangiography for the detection and localization of bile duct leakage. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:613-617.
13. Sacharias N. Safety of Biliscopin. Australas Radiol. 1995;39:101.