Localization-delocalization transition in one-dimensional electron systems with long-range correlated disorder

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 7, 2004, Pages

  Shima, H ^a   Nomura, T ^a   Nakayama, T ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSITION ELEMENT;

ARTICLE; ELECTRON; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PARAMETER;

EID: 19544378493     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.075116     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. D. H. Dunlap, H-L. Wu, and P. W. Phillips, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 88 (1990).
2. S. N. Evangelou and A. Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 47, 13 126 (1993).
3. S. N. Evangelou and E. N. Economou, J. Phys. A 26, 2803 (1993).
4. V. Bellani, E. Diez, R. Hey, L. Toni, L. Tarricone, G. B. Parravicini, F. Domínguez-Adame, and R. Goméz-Alcal'a, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2159 (1999).
5. H. Yamada, M. Goda, and Y. Aizawa, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 3, 10043 (1991); J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60, 3501 (1991).
6. H. Yamada, M. Goda, and Y. Aizawa, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 3, 10043 (1991); J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60, 3501 (1991).
7. F. A. B. F. de Moura and M. L. Lyra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3735 (1998).
8. F. M. Izrailev and A. A. Krokhin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4062 (1999).
9. H. Yamada and T. Okabe, Phys. Rev. E 63, 026203 (2001).
10. S. Russ, J. W. Kantelhardt, A. Bunde, and S. Havlin, Phys. Rev. B 64, 134209 (2001).
11. L. Tessieri and F. M. Izrailev, Phys. Rev. E 64, 066120 (2001).
12. P. Carpena, P. B. Galvan, P. Ch. Ivanov, and H. E. Stanley, Nature (London) 418, 955 (2002).
13. L. I. Deych, M. V. Erementchouk, and A. A. Lisyansky, Phys. Rev. B 67, 024205 (2003).
14. P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958).
15. E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 673 (1979).
16. F. Domínguez-Adame, E. Macía, and A. Sánchez, Phys. Rev. B 48, 6054 (1993).
17. F. A. B. F. de Moura, M. D. Coutinho-Filho, E. P. Raposo, and M. L. Lyra, Phys. Rev. B 68, 012202 (2003).
18. 2 instead of W. In fact, the normalization condition σ = 1 has been adopted in Ref. 16 for establishing potential sequences. The pertinence of this normalization procedure was discussed in Refs. 18 and 19.
19. J. W. Kantelhardt, S. Russ, A. Bunde, S. Havlin, and I. Webman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 198 (2000).
20. F. A. B. F. de Moura and M. L. Lyra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 199 (2000).
21. K. Isii, Suppl. Prog. Theor. Phys. 53, 77 (1973).
22. A. B. Harris, J. Phys. C 7, 1671 (1974); Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 49, 347 (1983).
23. A. B. Harris, J. Phys. C 7, 1671 (1974); Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 49, 347 (1983).
24. J. T. Chayes, L. Chayes, D. S. Fisher, and T. Spencer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2999 (1986).
25. D. Saupe, in The Science of Fractal Images, edited by H.-O. Peitgen and D. Saupe (Springer, New York, 1988); J. Feder, Fractals (Plenum Press, New York, 1988).
26. D. Saupe, in The Science of Fractal Images, edited by H.-O. Peitgen and D. Saupe (Springer, New York, 1988); J. Feder, Fractals (Plenum Press, New York, 1988).
27. C.-K. Peng, S. Havlin, M. Schwartz, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. A 44, R2239 (1991).
28. S. Prakash, S. Havlin, M. Schwartz, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. A 46, R1724 (1992).
29. B. Kramer and A. MacKinnon, Rep. Prog. Phys. 56, 1469 (1993).
30. c is independent of p and the critical exponent ν decreases monotonically with increasing p.
31. B. Huckestein, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 357 (1995).
32. K. Slevin and T. Ohtsuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 382 (1999).
33. K. Slevin, P. Markos, and T. Ohtsuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3594 (2001).
34. H. Shima and T. Nakayama (unpublished).
35. A. Weinrib and B. I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. B 27, 413 (1983).
36. A. Weinrib, Phys. Rev. B 29, 387 (1984).
37. P. G. Harper, Proc. Phys. Soc., London, Sect. A 68, 874 (1955).
38. D. R. Hofstadter, Phys. Rev. B 14, 2239 (1976).
39. A. Aubry and G. André, Ann. Isr. Phys. Soc. 3, 133 (1980).
40. c does not relate to the spatial correlation of random potential, but simply stems from the tight-binding approximation adopted in all the three models. Further consideration is needed for clarifying this point.