Theory of Mott insulator-band insulator heterostructures

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 7, 2004, Pages

  Okamoto, Satoshi ^a   Millis, Andrew J ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LANTHANUM TITANIUM TRIOXIDE; METAL OXIDE; STRONTIUM TITANIUM TRIOXIDE; TITANIUM DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRON; ELECTRONICS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; OPTICS; ORBIT; POLARIZATION;

EID: 19544374314     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.075101     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1039 (1998).
2. Y. Tokura and N. Nagaosa, Science 288, 462 (2000).
3. R. Hesper, L. H. Tjeng, A. Heeres, and G. A. Sawatzky, Phys. Rev. B 62, 16 046 (2000).
4. R. Matzdorf, Z. Fang, Ismail, J. Zhang, T. Kimura, Y. Tokura, K. Terakura, and E. W. Plummer, Science 289, 746 (2000); R. G. Moore, J. Zhang, S. V. Kalinin, Ismail, A. P. Baddorf, R. Jin, D. G. Mandrus, and E. W. Plummer, Phys. Status Solidi A (to be published 2004).
5. R. Matzdorf, Z. Fang, Ismail, J. Zhang, T. Kimura, Y. Tokura, K. Terakura, and E. W. Plummer, Science 289, 746 (2000); R. G. Moore, J. Zhang, S. V. Kalinin, Ismail, A. P. Baddorf, R. Jin, D. G. Mandrus, and E. W. Plummer, Phys. Status Solidi A (to be published 2004).
6. M. Izumi, Y. Murakami, Y. Konishi, T. Manako, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. B 60, 1211 (1999).
7. A. Ohtomo, D. A. Muller, J. L. Grazul, and H. Y. Hwang, Nature (London) 419, 378 (2002).
8. M. Izumi, Y. Ogimoto, Y. Konishi, T. Manako, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, Mater. Sci. Eng., B 84, 53 (2001); A. Biswas, M. Rajeswari, R. C. Srivastava, Y. H. Li, T. Venkatesan, R. L. Greene, and A. J. Millis, Phys. Rev. B 61, 9665 (2000); A. Biswas, M. Rajeswari, R. C. Srivastava, T. Venkatesan, R. L. Greene, Q. Lu, A. L. de Lozanne, and A. J. Millis, ibid. 63, 184424 (2001).
9. M. Izumi, Y. Ogimoto, Y. Konishi, T. Manako, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, Mater. Sci. Eng., B 84, 53 (2001); A. Biswas, M. Rajeswari, R. C. Srivastava, Y. H. Li, T. Venkatesan, R. L. Greene, and A. J. Millis, Phys. Rev. B 61, 9665 (2000); A. Biswas, M. Rajeswari, R. C. Srivastava, T. Venkatesan, R. L. Greene, Q. Lu, A. L. de Lozanne, and A. J. Millis, ibid. 63, 184424 (2001).
10. M. Izumi, Y. Ogimoto, Y. Konishi, T. Manako, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, Mater. Sci. Eng., B 84, 53 (2001); A. Biswas, M. Rajeswari, R. C. Srivastava, Y. H. Li, T. Venkatesan, R. L. Greene, and A. J. Millis, Phys. Rev. B 61, 9665 (2000); A. Biswas, M. Rajeswari, R. C. Srivastava, T. Venkatesan, R. L. Greene, Q. Lu, A. L. de Lozanne, and A. J. Millis, ibid. 63, 184424 (2001).
11. T. Saitoh, A. E. Bocquet, T. Mizokawa, and A. Fujimori, Phys. Rev. B 52, 7934 (1995).
12. S. Okamoto and A. J. Millis, Nature (London) 428, 630 (2004).
13. D. A. Maclean, H.-N. Ng, and J. E. Greedan, J. Solid State Chem. 30, 35 (1979).
14. H. Fujitani and S. Asano, Phys. Rev. B 51, 2098 (1995).
15. J. C. Slater and G. F. Koster, Phys. Rev. 94, 1498 (1954).
16. T. Mizokawa and A. Fujimori, Phys. Rev. B 51, 12 880 (1995).
17. T. Sakudo and H. Unoki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 851 (1971); K. A. Müller and H. Burkard, Phys. Rev. B 19, 3593 (1979).
18. T. Sakudo and H. Unoki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 851 (1971); K. A. Müller and H. Burkard, Phys. Rev. B 19, 3593 (1979).
19. S. Okamoto and A. J. Millis, cond-mat/0402267.
20. Y. Okimoto, T. Katsufuji, Y. Okada, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. B 51, 9581 (1995).
21. S. Ishihara, T. Hatakeyama, and S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. B 65, 064442 (2002).
22. M. Mochizuki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71, 2039 (2002).
23. G. Khaliullin and S. Okamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 167201 (2002).
24. T. Kiyama and M. Itoh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 167202 (2003).
25. M. Cwik, T. Lorenz, J. Baier, R. Müller, G. Andre, F. Bouree, F. Lichtenberg, A. Freimuth, R. Schmitz, E. Müller-Hartmann, and M. Braden, Phys. Rev. B 68, 060401(R) (2003).
26. M. Mochizuki and M. Imada, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 167203 (2003).
27. Actually, the crossover length is dependent on both the parameters εand U in the following way; with increasing ε, the confinement potential due to the La layer becomes weak and the crossover length becomes longer, with increasing U the electron density at each site decreases thus the crossover length becomes longer. However, ε and U dependencies are weak, and qualitative behavior does not change.
28. R. D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Cryst. Phys., Diffr., Theor. Gen. Crystallogr. 32, 751 (1976).