Matching science with coastal management needs: The search for appropriate coastal state indicators

Journal of Coastal Research

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 399-411

  Van Koningsveld, Mark ^a,b   Davidson, Mark A ^c   Huntley, David A ^c  

^a WL DELFT HYDRAULICS   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argus; Benchmarking; Coastal policy and management; Coastal science; Coastal state indicators; CoastView; Communication; End users; Evaluation; Frame of reference; Gap; Research management; Strategic and operational objectives

Indexed keywords

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; POLICY MAKING;

EID: 19544372746     PISSN: 07490208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2112/03-0076.1     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. AARNINKHOF, S.G.J.; CALJOUW, M., and STIVE, M.J.F., 2000. Video-based, quantitative estimations of intertidal beach variability. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Coastal Engineering, 3291-3304.
2. AARNINKHOF, S.G.J. and HOLMAN, R.A., 1999. Monitoring the near-shore with video. Backscatter, 10(2), 8-11.
3. AARNINKHOF, S.G.J. and ROELVINK, R.A., 1999. Argus-based monitoring of intertidal beach morphodynamics. Proceedings of the Coastal Dynamics '99, 2429-2444.
4. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 1999. Lessons Learned from the European Commission's Demonstration Programme on Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
5. HOLLAND, K.T.; HOLMAN, R.A.; LIPMANN, T.C.; STANLEY, J., and ELGAR, S., 1997. Practical use of video imagery in nearshore oceanographic field studies. Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 22, 81-92.
6. HOLMAN, R.A.; SALLENGER, A.H.; LIPPMANN, T.C., and HAINES, J.W., 1993. The application of video image processing to the study of nearshore processes. Oceanography, 6, 78-85.
7. KINGSTON, K.S.; RUESSINK, B.G.; VAN ENCKEVORT, I.M.J., and DAVIDSON, M.A., 2000. Artificial neural network correction of remotely sensed sandbar location. Marine Geology, 1(69), 137-160.
8. LIPPMANN, T.C. and HOLMAN, R.A., 1990. The spatial and temporal variability of sand bar morphology. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95(C7), 11, 575-590.
9. MULDER, J.P.M.; VAN KONINGSVELD, M.; OWEN, M.W., and RAWSON, J., 2001. Tools and Guidelines for Coastal Zone Management: Applicable to Problems on Sandy Coasts, Tidal Inlets, River and Estuary Mouths (End Report CZM Tools Group COAST3D, Report RIKZ/2001.020. EU Mast project no. MAS3-CT97-0086). Den Haag, The Netherlands: Rijksinstituut voor Kust en Zee (RIKZ).
10. PLANT, N.G. and HOLMAN, R.A., 1997. Intertidal beach profile estimation using video images. Marine Geology, 140, 1-24.
11. VAN ENCKEVORT, I.M.J., 2001. Daily to Yearly Nearshore Bar Behaviour. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Physical Geography, Utrecht University, Doctoral thesis.
12. VAN KONINGSVELD, M., 2003. Matching Specialist Knowledge with End User Needs. Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Doctoral thesis.
13. VAN KONINGSVELD, M. and MULDER, J.P.M., 2003, 2004. Sustainable coastal policy developments in the Netherlands: a systematic approach revealed. Journal of Coastal Research, 20(2), 375-385.
14. VAN KONINGSVELD, M.; STIVE, M.J.F.; MULDER, J.P.M.; DE VRIEND, H.J.; RUESSINK, B.G., and DUNSBERGEN, D.W., 2003. Usefulness and effectiveness of coastal research: a matter of perception? Journal of Coastal Research, 19(2), 441-461.