Endovascular versus "fast-track" abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 229-236

  Abularrage, Christopher J ^a   Sheridan, Michael J ^b   Mukherjee, Dipankar ^b,c  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b INOVA FAIRFAX HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; BISACODYL; FENTANYL; HEPARIN; METOCLOPRAMIDE; OXYCODONE; PROKINETIC AGENT;

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AGE; AGED; ANEURYSM SURGERY; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; COLLOID; COST MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS; CRYSTALLOID; DEMOGRAPHY; ENDOVASCULAR ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM REPAIR; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; EVALUATION; FAST TRACK ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM REPAIR; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; INCOME; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONEY; OPERATING ROOM; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETROPERITONEUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL MORTALITY; TRANSFUSION; UNITED STATES;

AGED; ANALGESIA, PATIENT-CONTROLLED; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; COLLOIDS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; ISOTONIC SOLUTIONS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PLASMA SUBSTITUTES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TIME FACTORS; VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 19444367739     PISSN: 15385744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/153857440503900303     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Parodi J, Palmaz J, Barone H: Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg 5:491-499, 1991.
2. Dubost C, Allary M, Oeconomos N: A propos du traitement des aneurysms de l'aorte. Mem Acad Chir Paris 77:381, 1951.
3. Brewster D, Geller S, Kaufman J, et al: Initial experience with endovascular aneurysm repair: Comparison of early results with outcome of conventional open repair. J Vasc Surg 27:992-1003, 1998.
4. May J, White G, Yu W, et al: Concurrent comparison of endoluminal versus open repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Analysis of 303 patients by life table method. J Vasc Surg 27:213-220, 1998.
5. Zarins C, White R, Moll F, et al: The AneuRx stent graft: Four-year results and worldwide experience 2000. J Vasc Surg 33:S135-S145, 2001.
6. Moore W, Kashyap V, Vescera C, et al: Abdominal aortic aneurysm: A 6-year comparison of endovascular versus transabdominal repair. Ann Surg 230:298-308, 1999.
7. Collin J, Murie J: Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: A failed experiment. Br J Surg 88:1281-1282, 2001.
8. Quiñones-Baldrich W, Garner C, Caswell D, et al: Endovascular, transperitoneal, and retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Results and costs. J Vasc Surg 30:59-67, 1999.
9. Sicard G, Reilly J, Rubin B, et al: Transabdominal versus retroperitoneal incision for abdominal aortic surgery: Report of a prospective randomized trial. J Vasc Surg 21:174-181, 1995.
10. Cambria R, Brewster D, Abbott W: Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for aortic reconstruction: A randomized prospective study. J Vasc Surg 11:314-325, 1990.
11. Mukherjee D: "Fast-track" abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Vasc Endovasc Surg 37:329-334, 2003.
12. Veith F, Johnston W: Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: An innovation in evolution and evaluation. J Vasc Surg 35:183, 2002.
13. Ouriel K, Greenberg R, Clair D, et al: Endovascular aneurysm repair: Gender specific results. J Vasc Surg 38:93-98, 2003.
14. Rowlands T, Homer-Vanniasinkam S: Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine release in open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 88:1335-1340, 2001.
15. Cuypers P, Gardien M, Buth J, et al: Randomized study comparing cardiac response in endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 88:1059-1065, 2001.
16. Virgilio C, Bui H, Donayre C, et al: Endovascular vs open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A comparison of cardiac morbidity and mortality. Arch Surg 134:947-951, 1999.
17. Sampram E, Karafa M, Mascha E, et al: Nature, frequency, and predictors of secondary procedures after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 37:930-937, 2003.
18. Conners M, Sternbergh W, Carter G, et al: Secondary procedures after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 36:992-996, 2002.
19. Laheij RJ, Buth J, Harris PL, et al: Need for secondary interventions after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Intermediate-term follow-up results of a European collaborative registry (EUROSTAR). Br J Surg 87:1666-1673, 2000.
20. Zarins CK; AneuRx Clinical Investigators: The US AneuRx Clinical Trial: 6-year clinical update 2002. J Vasc Surg 37:904-908, 2003.
21. Carpenter J, Baum R, Barker C, et al: Durability of benefits of endovascular versus conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 35:222-228, 2002.
22. Dryjski M, O'Brien-Irr M, Hassett J: Hospital costs for endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Am Coll Surg 197:64-70, 2003.
23. Bosch J, Lester J, McMahon P, et al: Hospital costs for elective endovascular and surgical repairs of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Radiology 220:492-497, 2001.
24. Rigberg DA, Dorafshar A, Sridhar A, et al: Abdominal aortic aneurysm: Stent graft vs clinical pathway for direct retroperitoneal repair. Arch Surg 139:941-946, 2004.
25. Bertges D, Rhee R, Muluk S, et al: Is routine use of the intensive care unit after elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair necessary? J Vasc Surg 32:634-642, 2000.