Handheld computers and paper diaries for documenting the use of factor concentrates used in haemophilia home therapy: A qualitative study

Haemophilia

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 216-226

  Arnold, Emmy ^a   Heddle, N ^a,b   Lane, S ^a   Sek, J ^c   Almonte, T ^c   Walker, I ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b CANADIAN BLOOD SERVICES   (Canada)

^c HAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES   (Canada)

Author keywords

Haemophilia; Handheld computers; Home therapy; Interviews; Paper diaries; Qualitative

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DOCUMENTATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HEMOPHILIA; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; METHODOLOGY; MICROCOMPUTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BLOOD COAGULATION FACTORS; CAREGIVERS; CHILD; DATA COLLECTION; HEMOPHILIA A; HOME NURSING; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MEDICAL RECORDS; MICROCOMPUTERS; MOTIVATION; PATIENT COMPLIANCE;

EID: 19444364931     PISSN: 13518216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01095.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Teitel JM, Barnard D, Israels S et al. Home management of haemophilia. Haemophilia 2004; 10: 118-33.
2. Soucie JM, Nuss R, Evatt B et al. Mortality among males with hemophilia: relations with source of medical care. The Hemophilia Surveillance System Project Investigators. Blood 2000; 96: 437-42.
3. Walker IR, Sek JT, Almonte TM et al. Developing a tracking system for coagulation factor concentrates in southern Ontario. Transfusion 2003; 43: 556-62.
4. Henker B, Whalen CK, Jamner LD et al. Anxiety, affect, and activity in teenagers: monitoring, daily life with electronic diaries. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002; 41: 660-70.
5. Shiffman S, Elash CA, Paton SM et al. Comparative efficacy of 24-hour and 16-hour transdermal nicotine patches for relief of morning craving. Addiction 2000; 95: 1185-95.
6. Collins PW, Bolton-Maggs P, Stephenson D et al. Pilot study of an Internet-based electronic patient treatment record and communication system for haemophilia, Advoy.com. Haemophilia 2003; 9: 285-91.
7. Stone AA, Shiffman S, Schwartz JE et al. Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Control Clin Trials 2003; 24: 182-99.
8. Saleh KJ, Radosevich DM, Kassim RA et al. Comparison of commonly used orthopaedic outcome measures using palm-top computers and paper surveys. J Orthop Res 2002; 20: 1146-51.
9. Caro JJ Sr, Caro I, Caro J et al. Does electronic implementation of questionnaires used in asthma alter responses compared to paper implementation? Qual Life Res 2001; 10: 683-91.
10. Walker I, Sigouin C, Sek J et al. Comparing hand-held computers and paper diaries for haemophilia home therapy: a randomized trial. Haemophilia 2004; 10: 698-704.
11. Strauss A, Corbin J, Peter L. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. London, UK: Sage Publications, Inc., 1998.
12. Green J, Britten N. Qualitative research and evidence based medicine. BMJ 1998; 316: 1230-2.
13. Hills M. Human science research in public health: the contribution and assessment of a qualitative approach. Can J Public Health 2000; 91: 14-17.
14. Morse JM, Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1994.
15. Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995; 311: 42-5.
16. Miller WL, Crabtree BF. Doing Qualitative Research. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1999.
17. Morgan DL. Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research. Qual Health Res 1998; 8: 362-76.
18. Cresswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1998.
19. Quinn P, Goka J, Richardson H. Assessment of an electronic daily diary in patients with overactive bladder. BJU Int 2003; 91: 647-52.
20. Johannes CB, Crawford SL, Woods J et al. An electronic menstrual cycle calendar: comparison of data quality with a paper version. Menopause 2000; 7: 200-8.
21. Tiplady B, Crompton G, Dewar M et al. The use of electronic diaries in respiratory studies. Drug Inf J 1997; 31: 759-64.
22. McBride JS, Anderson RT, Bahnson JL. Using a hand-held computer to collect data in an orthopedic outpatient clinic: a randomized trial of two survey methods. Med Care 1999; 37: 647-51.
23. Drummond HE, Ghosh S, Ferguson A et al. Electronic quality of life questionnaires: a comparison of pen-based electronic questionnaires with conventional paper in a gastrointestinal study. Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 21-6.
24. Jamison RN, Gracely RH, Raymond SA, et al. Comparative study of electronic vs. paper VAS ratings: a randomized, crossover trial using healthy volunteers. Pain 2002; 99: 341-7.
25. Stratton RJ, Stubbs RJ, Hughes D et al. Comparison of the traditional paper visual analogue scale questionnaire with an Apple Newton electronic appetite rating system (EARS) in free living subjects feeding ad libitum. Eur J Clin Nutr 1998; 52: 737-41.