Analytical approaches to address homeland security issues

Engineering Technology Management

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 199-204

  Holter, Gregory M ^a   Young, Jonathan ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; LAW ENFORCEMENT; PROBABILITY; PUBLIC POLICY; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

HOMELAND SECURITY; RISK ANALYSIS;

MILITARY OPERATIONS;

EID: 1942536679     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/imece2003-42742     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Miller, Steven E., March 2003, "After the 9/11 Disaster: Washington's Struggle to Improve Homeland Security," in Axxess. no. 2, 8-11, Stockholm, Sweden.
2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, June 1995, NASA Systems Engineering Handbook, SP-6105.
3. National Commission on Terrorism, 2000, Countering the Changing Threat of International Terrorism.
4. Parachini, John V., July 26, 2000, "Combating Terrorism: Assessing Threats, Risk Management, and Establishing Priorities," Testimony before the House Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations.
5. Ruvinsky, Jessica, March 12, 2003, "Post-9/11, Scholar Advocates Objective Risk Assessment," in Stanford Report, Stanford University.
6. Stungis, George E. and Thomas R. Schori, March 2003, "A Terrorist Target Selection and Prioritization Model," in The Journal of Homeland Security, Analytic Services Inc.
7. The White House, February 2003, "The National Strategy for the Physical Protection of Critical Infrastructures and Key Assets." Washington, DC.
8. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2003, http://www.dhs.gov, Washington, DC.
9. Woo, Dr. Gordon, 2002, "Quantitative Terrorism Risk Assessment," Risk Management Solutions Ltd.