Floral sex allocation in Corydalis ambigua populations visited by different pollinators

Ecoscience

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 218-227

  Kudo, Gaku ^a   Kasagi, Tetsuya ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bumblebee pollination; Floral sex allocation; Geitonogamy; Hermaphrodite; Nectar robbing; Pollen flow; Seed production

Indexed keywords

FLOWER VISITING; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEED PRODUCTION; SEX ALLOCATION;

BOMBUS HYPNORUM; BOMBUS HYPOCRITA; COROLLA; CORYDALIS; HYMENOPTERA;

EID: 1942535336     PISSN: 11956860     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11956860.2004.11682827     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barrett, S. C. H., L. D. Harder & W. W. Cole, 1994. Effects of flower number and position on self-fertilization in experimental populations of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Functional Ecology, 8: 526-535.
2. Brunet, J., 1996. Male reproductive success and variation in fruit and seed set in Aquilegia caerulea (Ranunculaceae). Ecology, 77: 2458-2471.
3. Brunet, J. & D. Charlesworth, 1995. Floral sex allocation in sequentially blooming plants. Evolution, 49: 70-79.
4. Campbell, D. A., 1989. Inflorescence size: Test of the male function hypothesis. American Journal of Botany, 76: 730-738.
5. Corbet, S. A., I. Cuthill, M. Fallows, T. Harrison & G. Hartley, 1981. Why do nectar-foraging bees and wasps work upward on inflorescences? Oecologia, 51: 79-83.
6. Cruzan, M. B., P. R. Neal & M. F. Willson, 1988. Floral display in Phyla incisa: Consequences for male and female reproductive success. Evolution, 42: 505-515.
7. de Jong, T. D., P. G. L. Klinkhamer & M. C. J. Rademaker, 1999. How geitonogamous selfing affects sex allocation in hermaphrodite plants. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12: 166-176.
8. de Jong, T. D., N. W. Waser & P. G. L. Klinkhamer, 1993. Geitonogamy: The neglected side of selfing. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8: 321-325.
9. Dudash, M. R., 1991. Plant size effects on female and male function in hermaphroditic Sabatia angularis (Gentianaceae). Ecology, 72: 1004-1012.
10. Goulson, D., J. C. Stout, S. A. Hawson & J. A. Allen, 1998. Floral display size in comfrey, Symphytum officinale L. (Boraginaceae): Relationships with visitation by three bumblebee species and subsequent seed set. Oecologia, 113: 502-508.
11. Harder, L. D. & S. C. H. Barrett, 1993. Pollen removal from tristylous Pontederia cordata: Effects of anther position and pollinator specialization. Ecology, 74: 1059-1072.
12. Harder, L. D. & S. C. H. Barrett, 1996. Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. Pages 140-189 in D. G. Lloyd & S. C. H. Barrett (eds.). Floral Biology: Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants. Chapman & Hall, New York, New York.
13. Harder, L. D. & J. D. Thomson, 1989. Evolutionary options for maximizing pollen dispersal of animal-pollinated plants. American Naturalist, 133: 323-344.
14. Haynes, J. R. & M. Mesler, 1984. Pollen foraging by bumblebees: Foraging patterns and efficiency of Lupinus polyphyllus. Oecologia, 61: 249-253.
15. Hessing, M. B., 1988. Geitonogamous pollination and its consequences in Geranium caespitosum. American Journal of Botany, 75: 1324-1333.
16. Higashi, S., M. Ohara, H. Arai & K. Matsuo, 1988. Robberlike pollinators: Overwintered queen bumblebees foraging on Corydalis ambigua. Ecological Entomology, 13: 411-418.
17. Irwin, R. E. & A. K. Brody, 1998. Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: Effects on pollinator behavior and plant fitness. Oecologia, 116: 519-527.
18. Irwin, R. E. & A. K. Brody, 1999. Nectar-robbing bumble bees reduce the fitness of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Ecology, 80: 1703-1712.
19. Ito, M., 1985. Supraspecific classification of bumblebees based on the characters of male genitalia. Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Series B, 20: 1-143.
20. Kearns, C. A. & D. W. Inouye, 1993. Technique for Pollination Biologists. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.
21. Klinkhamer, P. G. L. & T. J. de Jong, 1993. Attractiveness to pollinators: A plant's dilemma. Oikos, 66: 180-184.
22. Klinkhamer, P. G. L., T. J. de Jong & H. Metz, 1997. Sex and size in cosexual plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 12: 260-265.
23. Kohn, J. R. & S. C. H. Barrett, 1994. Pollen discounting and the spread of a selfing variant in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata: Evidence from experimental populations. Evolution, 48: 1576-1594.
24. Kudo, G., T. Maeda & K. Narita, 2001. Variation in floral sex allocation and reproductive success within inflorescences of Corydalis ambigua (Fumariaceae): Pollination efficiency or resource limitation? Journal of Ecology, 89: 48-56.
25. Lee, T. D., 1988. Patterns of fruit and seed production. Pages 179-202 in J. Lovett Doust & L. Lovett Doust (eds.). Plant Reproductive Ecology: Patterns and Strategies. Oxford University Press, New York, New York.
26. Lloyd, D. G. & C. J. Webb, 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 24: 135-162.
27. Lloyd, D. G. & J. M. A. Yates, 1982. Intrasexual selection and the segregation of pollen and stigma in hermaphrodite plants, exemplified by Wahlenbergia albomarginata (Campanulaceae). Evolution, 36: 903-913.
28. Maloof, J. E. & D. W. Inouye, 2000. Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists? Ecology, 81: 2651-2661.
29. Mitchell, R. J., 1993. Adaptive significance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar production: Observation and experiment in the field. Evolution, 47: 25-35.
30. Morris, W. F., 1996. Mutualism denied? Nectar-robbing bumble bees do not reduce female or male success of bluebells. Ecology, 77: 1451-1462.
31. Navarro, L., 2000. Pollination ecology of Anthyllis vulneraria subsp. vulgaris (Fabaceae): Nectar robbers as pollinators. American Journal of Botany, 87: 980-985.
32. Ohara, M. & S. Higashi, 1994. Effects of inflorescence size on visits from pollinators and seed set of Corydalis ambigua (Papaveraceae). Oecologia, 98: 25-30.
33. Ohwi, J. & M. Kitagawa, 1983. New Flora of Japan. Shibundo Publishers, Tokyo.
34. Pellmyr, O., 1987. Multiple sex expressions in Cimicifuga simplex: Dichogamy destabilizes hermaphroditism. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 31: 161-174.
35. Pyke, G. H., 1979. Optimal foraging in bumblebees: Rule of movement between flowers within inflorescences. Animal Behavior, 27: 1167-1181.
36. Schmid-Hempel, P. & B. Speiser, 1988. Effects of inflorescence size on pollination in Epilobium angustifolium. Oikos, 53: 98-104.
37. Snow, A. A., T. P. Spira, R. Simpson & R. A. Klips, 1996. The ecology of geitonogamous pollination. Pages 140-189 in D. G. Lloyd & S. C. H. Barrett (eds.). Floral Biology: Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants. Chapman & Hall, New York, New York.
38. Thomson, J. D. & S. C. H. Barrett, 1981. Temporal variation of gender in Aralia hispida Vent. (Araliaceae). Evolution, 35: 1094-1107.
39. Utelli, A.-B. & B. A. Roy, 2001. Causes and consequences of floral damage in Aconitum lycoctonum at high and low elevations in Switzerland. Oecologia, 127: 266-273.
40. Waddington, D. K. & B. Heinrich, 1979. The foraging movements of bumblebees on vertical "inflorescences": An experimental analysis. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 134: 113-117.
41. Yasaka, M., Y. Sunaga, F. Kawasaki & Y. Konno, 1994. Effect of forest fragmentation on the fruit set ratio for three perennial herbs. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 44: 1-7 (in Japanese with English summary).
42. Zimmerman, M., 1988. Nectar production, flowering phenology, and strategies for pollination. Pages 157-178 in J. Lovett Doust & L. Lovett Doust (eds.). Plant Reproductive Ecology: Patterns and Strategies. Oxford University Press, New York, New York.