Is electrosurgical loop excision with negative margins sufficient treatment for cervical ACIS?

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 465-468

  Bryson, P ^a   Stulberg, R ^a   Shepherd, L ^a   McLelland, K ^a   Jeffrey, J ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

ACIS; Endocervical glandular dysplasia; Loop electrosurgical excisional procedure

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURGERY; COLPOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVIX ADENOCARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA;

EID: 1942508861     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.01.028     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Widrich T., Kennedy A.W., Myers T.M., Hart W.R., Wirth S. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: management and outcome. Gynecol. Oncol. 61:1996;304-308.
2. Farnsworth A., Laverty C., Stoler M.H. Human papillomavirus messenger RNA expression in adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 8:1989;321-330.
3. Madeleine M.M., Darling J.R., Schwartz S.M., Shera K., McKnight B., Carter J.J.et al. Human papilloma virus and long-term oral contraceptive use increase the risk of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 10:2001;171-177.
4. Muntz H.G., Bell D.A., Lage J.M., Goff B.A., Feldman S., Rice L.W. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Obstet. Gynecol. 80:1992;935-939.
5. Shin C.H., Schorge J.O., Lee K.R., Sheets E.E. Cytologic and biopsy findings leading to conization in ACIS. Obstet. Gynecol. 100:2002;271-276.
6. Jaworski R.C. Endocervical glandular dysplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ and early invasive (microinvasive) adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 7:1990;190-204.
7. Muntz H.G., Bell D.A., Lage J.M., Goff B.A., Feldman S., Rice L.W. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Obstet. Gynecol. 80:1992;935-939.
8. Hopkins M.P., Roberts J.A., Schmidt R.W. Cervical adenocarcinoma in situ. Obstet. Gynecol. 71:1988;842-844.
9. Bertrand M., Lickrish G.M., Colgan T.R. The anatomic distribution of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: implications for treatment. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 157:1987;21-25.
10. Luesley D.M., Jordan J.A., Woodman C.B.J., Watson N., Williams D.R., Waddell C. A retrospective review of adenocarcinoma-in-situ and glandular atypia of the uterine cervix. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 94:1987;699-703.
11. Krivak T.C., Rose G.S., McBroom J.W., Carlson J.W., Winter W.E., Kost E.R. Cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: a systematic review of therapeutic options and predictors of persistent or recurrent disease. Obstet. Gynecol. Survey. 56:2001;179-182.
12. Andersen E.S., Nielsen K. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: a prospective study of conization as definitive treatment. Gynecol. Oncol. 86:2002;365-369.
13. Goldstein N.S., Mani A. The status and distance of cone biopsy margins as a predictor of excision adequacy for endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 109:1998;727-732.
14. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines Guidelines on adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: clinical features and review of management. JSOGC. 77:1999;699-706.
15. Kennedy A.W., Biscotti C.V. Further study of the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ. Gynecol. Oncol. 86:2002;361-364.
16. Ostor A.G. Early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 19:2000;29-38.
17. Girardi F., Heydarfadai M., Koroschetz F., Pickel H., Winter R. Cold-knife conization versus loop excision: histopathologic and clinical results of a randomized trial. Gynecol. Oncol. 55:1994;368-370.
18. Mahvert P., Dargent D., Roy M., Beau G. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser and LEEP. Gynecol. Oncol. 54:1994;175-179.
19. Ioffe O.B., Brooks S.E., Bueno De Rezende R., Silverberg S.G. Artifact in cervical LLETZ specimens: correlation with follow up. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 18:1999;115-121.
20. Wolf J.K., Levenbeck C., Malpacia A., Morris M., Burke T., Mitchell M.F. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: significance of cone biopsy margins. Obstet. Gynecol. 88:1996;82-86.
21. Denehy T.R., Gregori C.A., Breen J.L. Endocervical curettage, cone margins and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. Obstet. Gynecol. 90:1997;1-6.
22. Azodi M., Chambers S.K., Rutherford T.J., Kohorn E.I., Schwartz P.E., Chambers J.T. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: management and outcome. Gynecol. Oncol. 73:1999;348-353.
23. Colgan T.J., Lickrish G.M. The topography and invasive potential of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ, with and without associated squamous dysplasia. Gynecol. Oncol. 36:1990;246-249.
24. Weisbrot I.M., Stabinsky C., Davis A.M. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Cancer. 29:1972;1179-1187.
25. Nguyen G.-K., Jeannot A.B. Exfoliative cytology of in situ and microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytol. 28:1984;461-467.
26. Houghton S.J., Shafi M.I., Rollason T.P., Luesley D.M. Is loop excision adequate primary management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix? Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 104:1997;325-329.
27. Cutler J.B., Abulafia O., Gandia J., Lee-McBrien C. Metaanalysis comparing cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the treatment of adenocarcinoma in situ. Abstract from 31st Annual Meeting of SOGO Printed in. Gynecol. Oncol. vol. 76:2000;238-239.
28. Ostor A.G., Pagano R., Dvaoren R.A.M., Fortune D.W., Chanen W., Rome R. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 3:1984;179-190.
29. Clement B.P., Young R.H. Atlas of Gynecologic Surgical Pathology. 2000;109-113 W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia.