Using government performance management data to identify new business opportunities: Examples from government services outsourcing in the United States

International Review of Administrative Sciences

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 65-76

  Martin, Lawrence L ^a   Singh, Karun K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK; BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT; OUTSOURCING; PUBLIC SERVICE;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1942505877     PISSN: 00208523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0020852304041231     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Audit Commission (2000) On Target: The Practice of Performance Indicators. London: Audit Commission.
2. Bryan, L. (2002) 'Just-in-time Strategy for a Turbulent World', The Mckinsey Quarterly 2, URL (consulted 6 June 2002): http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com
3. Bouckaert, G. and Peters, G. (2002) 'Performance Measurement and Management', Public Performance & Management Review 25(4): 359-62.
4. Chi, K. and Jasper, C. (1998) Privatization Practices: A Review of Privatization in State Governments. Lexington, KY: The Council of State Governments.
5. Davies, M. and Shellard, E. (1997) 'The Value of Performance Measurement in the United Kingdom', Government Accountants Journal 46(3): 48-51.
6. DeMaio, C. (2002) 'Pioneering Performance', Government Executive (28 June), URL (consulted 1 July 2002): http://www.govexe.com/features/0702/0702manage.htm
7. General Accounting Office (GAO) (2002a) Improving the Sourcing Decisions of the Government - Final Report of the Commercial Activities Panel. Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office.
8. General Accounting Office (GAO) (2002b) Managing for Results: Agency Progress in Linking Performance Plans with Budgets and Financial Statements, GAO-02-236. Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office.
9. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) (1994) Concepts Statement No. 2 of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board on Concepts Related to Service Efforts and Accomplishments Reporting. Norwalk, CT: Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
10. Halachmi, A. (2002) 'Performance Measurement, Accountability and Improved Performance', Public Performance & Management Review 25(4): 370-4.
11. Harper, N. and Viguerie, S. (2002) 'Are You Too Focused?', The Mckinsey Quarterly 2, URL (consulted 4 June 2002): http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com
12. Hatry, H. (2002) 'Performance Measurement: Fashions and Fallacies', Public Performance & Management Review 25(4): 352-8.
13. Kelman, S. (2002) 'Contracting', in L. Salamon (ed.) The Tools of Government, pp. 282-318. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Martin, L. (1999) Contracting for Service Delivery: Local Government Choices. Washington, D.C.: International City/County Management Association.
15. Martin, L. (2002) Making Performance-based Contracting Perform: What the Federal Government Can Learn from State and Local Governments. Arlington, VA: Pricewaterhouse Coopers Endowment for the Business of Government.
16. Martin, L. and Miller, J. (2004) Contracting for Public Sector Services. Herndon, VA: National Institute of Governmental Purchasing.
17. McManus, S. (1991) 'Why Businesses are Reluctant to Sell to Governments', Public Administration Review 54(4): 328-45.
18. Melkers, J. and Willoughby, K. (1998) 'The State of the States: Performance-based Budgeting Requirements in 47 out of 50', Public Administration Review 58(1): 66-73.
19. Melkers, J. and Willoughby, K. (2001) 'Budgeters Views of State Performance Budgeting Systems: Distinctions Across Branches', Public Administration Review 61(1): 54-64.
20. Mol, N. (1996) 'Performance Indicators in the Dutch Department of Defence', Financial Accounting & Management 12(1): 71-81.
21. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (2002a) The President's Management Agenda. Washington, D.C.: Office of Management and Budget.
22. Office of Management and Budget (2002b) 'Memorandum for Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, Subject: Planning for the President's Fiscal Year 2004 Budget Requests'. Washington, D.C.: Office of Management and Budget.
23. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2000) Government of the Future. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
24. Porter, M. (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.
25. Reason Public Policy Institute (RPPI) (2002) Privatization 2000. Los Angeles, CA: Reason Public Policy Institute.
26. Rouse, P. (1995) 'Performance Measurement', Chartered Accountants of New Zealand 74(9): 179-98.
27. Schedler, K. (1994) 'Performance Measurement in a Direct Democratic Environment: Local Government Reforms in Switzerland', Public Budgeting & Financial Management 14(4): 36-53.
28. Singh, K. (2000) 'Strategic Planning Process Variation & Mission Performance: Results of an Exploratory Study', Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, New York City.
29. Steering Committee for the Review of Commonwealth/State Service Provision (1998) Report on Government Services, Volume 1: Education, Health, Justice, Emergency Management. Melbourne: Industry Commission.
30. Styles, A. (2000) 'Profiles in Leadership', The Business of Government (Spring): 98-100. Arlington, VA: PricewaterhouseCoopers.