Delayed saccades, but not delayed manual aiming movements, require visual attention shifts

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1004, Issue , 2003, Pages 289-296

  Deubel, Heiner ^a   Schneider, Werner X ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Delayed movements; Manual movements; Reaching; Saccade

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; MOTOR COORDINATION; PERCEPTION; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 1942502769     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1196/annals.1303.026     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. POSNER, M.I. 1980. Orienting of attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 32: 3-25.
2. TREISMAN, A.M. & G. GELADE. 1980. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognit. Psychol. 12: 97-136.
3. SCHNEIDER, W.X. 1995. VAM: a neuro-cognitive model for attention control of segmentation, object recognition and space-based motor action. Vis. Cognit. 2: 331-374.
4. DUNCAN, J. & G.W. HUMPHREYS. 1989. Visual-search and stimulus similarity. Psychol. Rev. 96: 433-458.
5. ALLPORT, D.A. 1987. Selection for action: some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In Perspectives on Perception and Action. H. Heuer & A.F. Sanders, Eds.: 395-419. Lawrence Erlbaum. Hillsdale, NJ.
6. NEUMANN, O. 1987. Beyond capacity: a functional view of attention. In Perspectives on Perception and Action. H. Heuer & A.F. Sanders, Eds.: 361-394. Lawrence Erlbaum. Hillsdale, NJ.
7. SHEPHERD, M., J.M. FINDLAY & R.J. HOCKEY. 1986. The relationship between eye movements and spatial attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 38A: 475-491.
8. HOFFMAN, J.E. & B. SUBRAMANIAM. 1995. The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Percept. Psychophys. 57: 787-795.
9. KOWLER, E., E. ANDERSON, B. DOSHER & E. BLASER. 1995. The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vis. Res. 35: 1897-1916.
10. DEUBEL, H. & W.X. SCHNEIDER. 1996. Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Res. 36: 1827-1837.
11. SCHNEIDER, W.X. & H. DEUBEL. 2002. Selection-for-perception and selection-for-spatial-motor-action are coupled by visual attention: a review of recent findings and new evidence from stimulus-driven saccade control. In Attention and Performance XIX: Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action. W. Prinz & B. Hommel, Eds.: 609-627. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.
12. DEUBEL, H., W.X. SCHNEIDER & I. PAPROTTA. 1998. Selective dorsal and ventral processing: evidence for a common attentional mechanism in reaching and perception. Vis. Cognit. 5: 81-107.
13. SCHIEGG, A., H. DEUBEL & W.X. SCHNEIDER. 2003. Attentional selection during preparation of prehension movements. Vis. Cognit. 10: 409-431
14. DEUBEL, H. & W.X. SCHNEIDER. 2003. Attentional selection in sequential manual movements, movements around an obstacle, and in grasping. In Attention in Action. G.W. Humphreys & M.J. Riddoch, Eds. Psychology Press. Hove. In press.
15. CASTIELLO, U. 1996. Grasping a fruit: selection for action. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22: 582-603.
16. CRAIGHERO, L., L. FADIGA, G. RIZZOLATTI & C. UMILTÀ. 1998. Visuomotor priming. Vis. Cognit. 5: 109-125.
17. ANDERSEN, R.A. & C.A. BUNEO. 2002. Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 25: 189-220.
18. SNYDER, L.H., A.P. BATISTA & R.A. ANDERSEN. 1997. Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature 386: 167-170.
19. BISLEY, J.W. & M.E. GOLDBERG. 2003. Neuronal activity in the lateral intraparietal area and spatial attention. Science 299: 81-86.