Does place still matter? Accounting for income variation across American Indian tribal areas

Economic Geography

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 365-386

  Leichenko, Robin M ^a  

^a Rutgers University   (United States)

Author keywords

Economic development; Native American; Poverty; Regional income

Indexed keywords

HUMAN CAPITAL; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; INDIGENOUS POPULATION; POVERTY DETERMINANT;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1942501698     PISSN: 00130095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00219.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Albrecht, D. E.; Albrecht, C. M.; and Albrecht, S. L. 2000. Poverty in nonmetropolitan America: Impacts of industrial, employment, and family structure variables. Rural Sociology 65:87-103.
2. Anderson, T. L. 1995. Sovereign nations or reservations? An economic history of American Indians. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy.
3. Barro, R. J., and Sala-i-Martin, X. 1992. Convergence. Journal of Political Economy 100:223-51.
4. Borts, G. H., and Stein, J. L. 1964. Economic growth in a free market. New York: Columbia University Press.
5. Bryden, J., ed. Forthcoming. Why local economies differ: The dynamics of rural areas in Europe. Ceredigion, U.K.: Edwin Mellen Press.
6. Center for Urban Policy Research. 2002. Housing and economic conditions on Native American tribal lands in the United States. Draft final report to the Fannie Mae Foundation. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University.
7. Claritas Corporation. 2000. Estimates of characteristics of population, housing and income across U.S. counties, 1999. Arlington, Va.: Claritas Corporation.
8. Cornell, S., and Kalt, J. P. 1992. Reloading the dice: Improving the chances for economic development on American Indian reservations. In What can tribes do? Strategies and institutions in American Indian economic development, ed. S. Cornell and J. Kalt, 1-51. Los Angeles: American Indian Studies Center, University of California Los Angeles.
9. Cornell, S., and Kalt, J. P. 2000. Where's the glue? Institutional and cultural foundations of American Indian economic development. Journal of Socio-Economics 29:443-70.
10. Cutler, D. M., and Glaeser, E. L. 1997. Are ghettos good or bad? Quarterly Journal of Economics 112:827-72.
11. Duffy, D., and Stubben, J. 1998. An assessment of Native American economic development: Putting culture and sovereignty back in the models. Studies in Comparative International Development 33(4):52-78.
12. Duncan, C. 1999. Worlds apart: Why poverty persists in rural America. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
13. Fixico, D. L. 2001. Myths and realities of Indian gaming. Journal of the West 40(2):3-4.
14. Frantz, K. 1999. Indian reservations in North America: Territory, sovereignty, and socio-economic change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Gaventa, J. 1980. Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
16. Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2002. Beyond global vs. local: Economic politics outside the binary frame. In Geographies of power: Placing scale, ed. A. Herod and M. Wright, 25-60. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
17. Glasmeier, A. 2002. One nation, pulling apart: The basis of persistent poverty in the U.S. Progress in Human Geography 26:151-69.
18. Glasmeier, A., and Fuellhart, K. 1998. Building on past experience: Creation of a new future for distressed counties. Washington, D.C.: Appalachian Regional Commission.
19. Glasmeier, A., and Leichenko, R. 1999. What does the future hold? What globalization might mean for the rural South. Southern Rural Sociology 15:59-83.
20. Glasmeier, A., and Wood, L. 2001. Evaluation of the Economic Development Administration's distressed area program. Draft report. New Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.
21. d'Hauteserre, A. 1998. Foxwoods casino resort: An unusual experiment in economic development, Economic Geography (Special Issue) 25-29 March:112-21.
22. Helliwell, J. F., and Putnam, R. D. 2000. Economic growth and social capital in Italy. In Social capital: A multifaceted perspective, ed. P. Dasgupta and I. Serageldin, 253-68. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
23. Henninger, N. 1998. Mapping and geographic analysis of human welfare and poverty- review and assessment. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.
24. Jensen, L. 1994. Employment hardship and rural minorities: Theory, research, and policy. Review of Black Political Economy 22:125-44.
25. Kaldor, N. 1970. The case for regional policies. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 17:337-48.
26. Kasarda, J. D. 1985. Urban change and minority opportunities. In The new urban reality, ed. P. Peterson, 33-68. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
27. Kingsley, G. T.; Spencer, V. E.; Simonson, J.; Herbig, C. E.; Kay, N.; Mikelsons, M.; and Tatian, P. 1996. Assessment of American Indian housing needs and programs: Final report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
28. Knack, S., and Keefer, P. 1997. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112:1251-88.
29. Kodras, J. E. 1997. The changing map of American poverty in an era of economic restructuring and political realignment. Economic Geography 73.1:67-93.
30. Krugman, P. 1991. Geography and trade. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
31. Levernier, W.; Partridge, M.; and Rickman, D. 2000. The causes of regional variations in U.S. poverty: A cross-county analysis. Journal of Regional Science 40: 473-97.
32. Lewis, O. 1966. The culture of poverty. Scientific American 215(4):19-25.
33. Manson, G., and Groop, R. 1990. The geography of nonemployment income. Social Science Journal 27:317-25.
34. Massey, D. S., and Eggers, M. L. 1990. The ecology of inequality: Minorities and the concentration of poverty, 1970-1990. American Journal of Sociology 95:1153-88.
35. McGranahan, D. A. 1999. Natural amenities drive rural population change. Washington, D.C.: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
36. Morrill, R. L., and Wohlenberg, E. H. 1971. The geography of poverty. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37. Mushinski, D. W., and Pickering, K. 2000. Inequality in income distributions: Does culture matter? An analysis of western Native American tribes. Journal of Economic Issues 34:403-12.
38. Myrdal, G. 1957. Economic theory and under-developed regions. London: Duckworth.
39. Narayan, D., and Pritchett, L. 2000. Social capital: Evidence and implications. In Social capital: A multifaceted perspective, ed. P. Dasgupta and I. Serageldin, 269-95. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
40. O'Brien, K. L., and Leichenko, R. 2003. Winners and losers in the context of global change. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93:99-113.
41. Pickering, K. A. 2000. Lakota culture, world economy. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
42. Ravillion, M., and Wodon, Q. 1999. Poor areas, or only poor people? Journal of Regional Science 39:689-711.
43. Reimer, B. 2002. Understanding social capital: Its nature and manifestations in rural Canada. Paper prepared for the Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association annual conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. June.
44. Roback, J. 1982. Wages, rents, and the quality of life. Journal of Political Economy 90:1257-78.
45. Rupasingha, A.; Goetz, S.; and Freshwater, D. 2002. Social and institutional factors as determinants of economic growth: Evidence from the United States counties. Papers in Regional Science 81:139-55.
46. Rural Sociological Society Task Force on Persistent Rural Poverty. 1993. Persistent poverty in rural America. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
47. Smith, D. M. 1973. The geography of social well-being in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.
48. Snipp, M. 1995. The educational attainments of American Indians. In Investing in people: The human capital needs of rural America, ed. L. Beaulieu and D. Mulkey, 139-65. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
49. Storper, M. 1997. The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford Press.
50. Tribal pursuit. The Salish-Kootenai tribe has succeeded where others have failed. Its secret: Think business, not bureaucracy. 2002. Wall Street Journal 27 March, R16-R17.
51. Trosper, R. L. 1996. American Indian poverty on reservations, 1969-1989. In Changing numbers, changing needs: American Indian demography and public health, ed. G. Sandefur, R. Rindfuss, and B. Cohen, 172-95. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
52. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2000. Regional economic information systems. CD-ROM. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
53. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2002. U.S. census 2000, summary file 1. Available online: www.census.gov
54. Vinje, D. L. 1996. Native American economic development on selected reservations: A comparative analysis. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 5:427-42.
55. Warren, M. R.; Thompson, J. P.; and Saegert, S. 2001. The role of social capital in combating poverty. In Social capital and poor communities, ed. S. Saegert, J. P. Thompson, and M. R. Warren, 1-28. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
56. Wilson, W. J. 1987. The truly disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57. Woolcock, M., and Narayan, D. 2000. Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. World Bank Research Observer 15:225-49.