Intrauterine versus transvaginal sonography for benign and malignant disorders of the female reproductive tract

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 382-387

  Gruessner, S E M ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Intraluminal sonography; Intrauterine sonography; Transvaginal sonography; Uterine imaging

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM; FEMALE STERILITY; GYNECOLOGIC DISEASE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERUS MYOMA;

ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FALLOPIAN TUBES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; LEIOMYOMA; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; UTERINE NEOPLASMS;

EID: 1942500250     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.1014     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Obata A, Akamatsu N, Sekiba K. Ultrasound estimation of myometrial invasion of endometrial cancer by intrauterine radial scanning. J Clin Ultrasound 1985; 13: 397-404.
2. Rosenberg P, Hakansson OM. Intrauterine ultrasonography and endometrial cancer. Lancet 1989; i: 842-843.
3. Kikuchi A, Okai T, Kobayashi K, Sakai M, Ryo E, Taketani Y. Intrauterine ultrasonography with a high-frequency probe: preliminary report. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 457-461.
4. Kikuchi A, Okai T, Kobayashi K, Yoshikawa H, Shiromizu K, Matzuzawa M, Taketani Y. Intracervical US with a high-frequency miniature probe: a method for diagnosing early invasive cervical cancer. Radiology 1996; 198: 411-413.
5. Yu KK, Forstner R, Hricak H. Cervical carcinoma: role of imaging. Abdom Imaging 1997; 22: 208-215.
6. Seki H, Takano T, Sakai K. Value of dynamic MR imaging in assessing endometrial carcinoma involvement of the cervix. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175: 171-176.
7. Postema S, Pattynama PMT, van Rijswijk CSP, Trimbos JP. Cervical carcinoma: can dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging help predict tumor aggressiveness? Radiology 1999; 210: 217-220.
8. Yamashita Y, Mizutani H, Torashima M, Takahashi M, Miyazaki K, Okamura H, Ushijima H, Ohtake H, Tokunaga T. Assessment of myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: transvaginal sonography vs contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161: 595-599.
9. Tewfey SA, Stahl JA, Middleton WD, Huettner PC, Bernhard LM, Brown JJ, Hildebolt CF, Mutch DG. Local staging of endometrial carcinoma: comparison of transvaginal and intraoperative sonography and gross visual inspection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 547-552.
10. Dubinsky TJ, Stroehlein K, Abu-Ghazzeh Y, Parvey HR, Maklad N. Prediction of benign and malignant endometrial disease: hysterosonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1999; 210: 393-397.
11. Liu JB, Goldberg BB. Endoluminal vascular and nonvascular sonography: past, present, future. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 765-774.
12. Liu JB, Goldberg BB. 2-D and 3-D endoluminal ultrasound: vascular and nonvascular applications. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25: 159-173.
13. Liu JB, Goldberg BB. 2-D and 3-D endoluminal ultrasound. Part II: clinical applications. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26(Suppl. 1): S137-S139.