Identification of suitable unoccupied habitats in metapopulation studies using co-occurrence of species

Oikos

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 408-414

  Münzbergová, Zuzana ^a   Herben, Tomáš ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COEXISTENCE; HABITAT AVAILABILITY; HABITAT QUALITY; METAPOPULATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPECIES OCCURRENCE;

EID: 1942489140     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13017.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Beals, E. W. 1984. Bray-Curtis Ordination: an effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data. - Adv. Ecol. Res. 14: 1-55.
2. Chytrý, M. and Rafajová, M. 2003. Czech National Phytosociological Database: basic statistics of the available vegetation-plot data. - Preslia 75: 1-15.
3. Chytrý, M., Tichý, L., Holt, J. et al. 2002. Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures. - J. Veg. Sci. 13: 79-90.
4. Chytrý, M., Tichý, L. and Roleček, J. (in press). Local and regional patterns of species richness in Central European vegetation types along the pH/calcium gradient. - Folia Geobot. 38.
5. Ehrlén, J. and Eriksson, O. 2000. Dispersal limitation and patch occupancy in forest herbs. - Ecology 81: 1667-1674.
6. Eriksson, O. 1996. Regional dynamics of plants: a review of evidence for remnant, source-sink and metapopulations. - Oikos 77: 248-258.
7. Eriksson, O. and Ehrlén, J. 1992. Seed and microsite limitation of recruitment in plant- populations. - Oecologia 91: 360-364.
8. Ewald, J. 2002. A probabilistic approach to estimating species pools from large compositional matrices. - J. Veg. Sci. 13: 191-198.
9. Freckleton, R. P. and Watkinson, A. R. 2002. Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations. - J. Ecol. 90: 419-434.
10. Gustafsson, C., Ehrlén, J. and Eriksson, O. 2002. Recruitment in Dentaria bulbifera; the roles of dispersal, habitat quality and mollusc herbivory. - J. Veg. Sci. 13: 719-724.
11. Hanski, I. and Simberloff, D. 1997. The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domains, and application to conservation. - In: Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M. (eds), Metapopulation biology. Academic Press, pp. 5-26.
12. Husband, B. C. and Barrett, S. H. 1996. A metapopulation perspective in plant population biology. - J. Ecol. 84: 461-469.
13. Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. - Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15: 237-240.
14. Losos, E. 1995. Habitat specificity of 2 palm species-experimental transplantation in Amazonian successional forests. - Ecology 76: 2595-2606.
15. Ouborg, N. J. 1993. Isolation, population-size and extinction- the classical and metapopulation approaches applied to vascular plants along the Dutch Rhine-system. - Oikos 66: 298-308.
16. Quintana-Ascencio, R. F. and Menges, E. S. 1996. Inferring metapopulation dynamics from patch-level incidence of Florida scrub plants. - Conserv. Biol. 10: 1210-1219.
17. SPSS Inc. 2001. SPSS for Windows (Release 11.0.1), SPSS Inc.
18. Turnbull, L. A., Crawley, M. J. and Rees, M. 2000. Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. - Oikos 88: 225-238.
19. Witte, J.-P. M. 1998: National water management and the value of nature. - PhD Thesis, Agric. Univ., Wageningen.