Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A comparative study

Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 379-382

  Nio, D ^a   Bemelman, W A ^a   Busch, O R C ^a   Vrouenraets, B C ^a   Gouma, D J ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Robot; Time action analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISSECTION; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; PARAMETER; PERFORMANCE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; SURGEON; SURGICAL TRAINING; TIME;

ADULT; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; MIDDLE AGED; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE; TIME AND MOTION STUDIES;

EID: 1942486866     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9133-6     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Boyd WD, Desai ND, Kiaii B, Rayman R, Menkis AH, McKenzie FN, Novick RJ (2000) A comparison of robot-assisted versus manually constructed endoscopic coronary anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg 70: 839-842
2. Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O, Izizaw R, Degueldre M, Vandromme, Capelluto E, Bruyns J (2001) Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery; 146 cases. World J Surg 25: 1467-1477
3. Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Bruyns J, Germay O, Leman G, Izizaw R (2001) Evaluation of telesurgical (robotic) NISSEN fundoplication. Surg 15: 918-923
4. Damiano Jr RJ, Tabaie HA, Mack MJ, Edgerton JR, Mullangi C, Graper WP, Prasad SM (2001) Initial prospective multicenter clinical trial of robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 72: 1263-1268
5. Den Boer KT, Straatsburg IH, Schellinger AV, de Wit LTh, Dankelman J, Gouma DJ (1999) Quantitative analysis of the functionality and efficiency of three surgical dissection techniques: a time-motion analysis. J Lap Endosc Adv Surg Tech 9: 389-395
6. Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Margossian H, Stevens L (2000) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study. Fertil Steril 73: 1040-1042
7. Garcia-Ruiz A, Gagner M, Miller JH, Steiner CP, Hahn JF (1998) Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks. Arch Surg 133:957-961
8. Marescaux J, Smith MK, Folscher D, Jamali F, Malassagne B, Leroy J (2001) Telerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial clinical experience with 25 patients. Ann Surg 234: 1-7
9. Melvin WC, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Schneider C, Ellison EC (2002) Computers-enhanced vs standard laparoscopic antireflux surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 6: 11-16
10. Nio D, Bemelman WA, Boer KT, Dunker MS, Gouma DJ, Gulik TM (2002) Efficiency of manual versus robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks. Surg Endosc 16: 412-415
11. Reichenspurner H, Damiano RJ, Mack M, Boehm DH, Gulbins H, Detter C, Meiser B, Ellgass R, Reichart B (1999) Use of the voice-controlled and computer-assisted surgical system ZEUS for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118: 11-16
12. Ruurda JP, Broeders IA, Simmermacher RP, Rinkes IH, van Vroonhoven TJ (2002) Feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an evaluation of 35 robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 41-45
13. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180: 101-125