Coulomb repulsion and quantum-classical correspondence in laser-induced nonsequential double ionization

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 214021-214024

  De Morisson Faria, C Figueira ^a,c   Liu, X ^a   Becker, W ^a   Schomerus, H ^b  

^a MAX BORN INSTITUT   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK KOMPLEXER SYSTEME   (Germany)

^c LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELASTICITY; ELECTRON SCATTERING; ENERGY CONSERVATION; INERT GASES; IONIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUANTUM THEORY;

FACTORIZATION; INELASTIC ELECTRON-ION SCATTERING;

ATOMIC PHYSICS;

EID: 1942476597     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. A. l'Huillier et al., Phys. Rev. A 27, 2503 (1983).
2. T. Weber et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 443 (2000); R. Moshammer et al. ibid. 84, 447 (2000).
3. T. Weber et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 443 (2000); R. Moshammer et al. ibid. 84, 447 (2000).
4. P.B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993).
5. R. Dörner et al., Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 48, 1 (2002).
6. D. Dundas et al., J. Phys. B 32, L231 (1999).
7. H.G. Muller, Opt. Express 8, 425 (2001).
8. R. Panfili, S.L. Haan, and J.H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 113001 (2002); S.L. Haan et al., Phys. Rev. A 66, 061402(R) (2002).
9. R. Panfili, S.L. Haan, and J.H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 113001 (2002); S.L. Haan et al., Phys. Rev. A 66, 061402(R) (2002).
10. M. Lein, E.K.U. Gross, and V. Engel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4707 (2000).
11. J.B. Watson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1884 (1997).
12. D. Bauer and F. Ceccherini, Opt. Express 8, 377 (2001).
13. L.-B. Fu, J. Liu, and S.-G. Chen, Phys. Rev. A 65, 021406(R) (2002).
14. A. Becker and F.H.M. Faisal, J. Phys. B 29, L197 (1996).
15. A. Becker and F.H.M. Faisal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3546 (2000); 89, 193003 (2002).
16. A. Becker and F.H.M. Faisal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3546 (2000); 89, 193003 (2002).
17. R. Kopold et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3781 (2000).
18. S.V. Popruzhenko and S.P. Goreslavskii, J. Phys. B 34, L239 (2001).
19. S.P. Goreslavskii et al., Phys. Rev. A 64, 053402 (2001).
20. A. Becker and F.H.M. Faisal, Phys. Rev. A 50, 3256 (1994).
21. C. Figueira de Morisson Faria and W. Becker, Laser Phys. 13, 1196 (2003).
22. C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, H. Schomerus, and W. Becker, Phys. Rev. A 66, 043413 (2002).
23. This is an excellent approximation and exactly true in so much as in the saddle-point integration the intermediate momentum k can be treated as real; for details, see C. Figueira de Morisson Faria et al., Phys. Rev. A (to be published).
24. R. Moshammer et al., Phys. Rev. A 65, 035401 (2002).
25. M. Weckenbrock et al., J. Phys. B 34, L449 (2001).
26. 2∥ = 0. These are absent in our calculations, which only include instantaneous inelastic rescattering. The different behavior of neon and argon has been traced back to the respective ionization and excitation cross sections by V.L. Bastos de Jesus et al (unpublished).
27. R. Moshammer et al., J. Phys. B 36, L113 (2003).
28. Spreading dampens the contributions of the longer orbits, whose influence on the yields is minor, except at channel closings; see S.V. Popruzhenko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 023001 (2002). Only the two shortest orbits are included in our calculations.
29. L.D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics (Pergamon, Oxford, 1977).
30. In fact, the classical simple-man model for NSDI has been derived from the amplitude (1) in Ref. [15].
31. M. Weckenbrock et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 123004 (2003).