Dynamics of entanglement in one-dimensional spin systems

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 223041-2230424

  Amico, Luigi ^a   Osterloh, Andreas ^a   Plastina, Francesco ^b   Fazio, Rosario ^b   Palma, G Massimo ^c  

^a INFM   (Italy)

^b SCUOLA NORMALE SUPERIORE   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; CORRELATION METHODS; DAMPING; FUNCTIONS; GROUND STATE; HAMILTONIANS; INFORMATION THEORY; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; STATISTICAL MECHANICS; VACUUM;

BELL STATES; QUANTUM CORRELATIONS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 1942476101     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. J.S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).
2. M. Nielsen and I. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Communication (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
3. A. Zeilinger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, S288 (1999).
4. A. Rauschenbeutel, G. Nogues, S. Osnaghi, P. Bertet, M. Brune, J.-M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Science 288, 2024 (2000).
5. C.A. Sackett, D. Kielpinski, B.E. King, C. Langer, V. Meyer, C.J. Myatt, M. Rowe, Q.A. Turchette, W.M. Itano, D.J. Wineland, and C. Monroe, Nature (London) 404, 256 (2000).
6. M. Bayer, P. Hawrylak, K. Hinzer, S. Fafard, M. Korkusinski, Z.R. Wasilewski, O. Stern, and A. Forchel, Science 291, 451 (2001).
7. D. Loss and E.V. Sukhorukov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1035 (2000); M.-S. Choi, C. Bruder, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B 62, 13 569 (2000).
8. D. Loss and E.V. Sukhorukov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1035 (2000); M.-S. Choi, C. Bruder, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B 62, 13 569 (2000).
9. F. Plastina, R. Fazio, and G.M. Palma, Phys. Rev. B 64, 113306 (2001).
10. S. Bose, e-print quant-ph/0212041.
11. J. Preskill, J. Mod. Opt. 47, 127 (2000).
12. K.M. O'Connor and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 63, 052302 (2001).
13. X. Wang and P. Zanardi, Phys. Lett. A 301, 1 (2002); X. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 66, 034302 (2002).
14. X. Wang and P. Zanardi, Phys. Lett. A 301, 1 (2002); X. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 66, 034302 (2002).
15. R.F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989).
16. X. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 64, 012313 (2001).
17. M.C. Arnesen, S. Bose, and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 017901 (2001).
18. D. Gunlycke, V.M. Kendon, V. Vedral, and S. Bose, Phys. Rev. A 64, 042302 (2001).
19. S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
20. A. Osterloh, L. Amico, G. Falci, and R. Fazio, Nature (London) 416, 608 (2002).
21. T.J. Osborne and M.A. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. A 66, 032110 (2002).
22. G. Vidal, J.I. Latorre, E. Rico, and A. Kitaev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 227902 (2003).
23. B.-Q. Jin and V.E. Korepin, e-print quant-ph/0304108.
24. D.V. Khveshchenko, e-print cond-mat/0301111.
25. P. Zanardi and X. Wang, J. Phys. A 35, 7947 (2002).
26. M.A. Martin-Delgado, e-print quant-ph/0207026.
27. B. Zeng, H. Zhai, and Z. Xu, Phys. Rev. A 66, 042324 (2002); A.P. Balachandran, L. Chandar, and Arshad Momen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12, 625 (1997).
28. B. Zeng, H. Zhai, and Z. Xu, Phys. Rev. A 66, 042324 (2002); A.P. Balachandran, L. Chandar, and Arshad Momen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12, 625 (1997).
29. A.P. Hines, R.H. McKenzie, and G.J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. A 67, 013609 (2003); Y. Shi, Phys. Lett. A 309, 254 (2003).
30. A.P. Hines, R.H. McKenzie, and G.J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. A 67, 013609 (2003); Y. Shi, Phys. Lett. A 309, 254 (2003).
31. T.J. Osborne and M.A. Nielsen, e-print quant-ph/0109024.
32. V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000).
33. E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Ann. Phys. 60, 407 (1961).
34. P. Pfeuty, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 57, 79 (1970).
35. E. Barouch, B.M. McCoy, and M. Dresden, Phys. Rev. A 2, 1075 (1970); E. Barouch and B.M. McCoy, ibid. 3, 786 (1971).
36. E. Barouch, B.M. McCoy, and M. Dresden, Phys. Rev. A 2, 1075 (1970); E. Barouch and B.M. McCoy, ibid. 3, 786 (1971).
37. E.R. Caianello and S. Fubini, Nuovo Cimento 9, 1218 (1952).
38. We would like to point out that the time dependence of the correlation functions calculated in Ref. [31] was due to a step-like time dependence in X. and the system was taken to be initially in equilibrium.
39. A further peculiarity of Eq. (12) as compared to the calculations done in Refs. [29-31] is that in the present case the Wick theorem leads to time-dependent Pfaffians.
40. L. Amico and A. Osterloh, J. Phys. A 37, 291 (2004).
41. G. Ghirardi, L. Marinatto, and T. Weber, J. Stat. Phys. 108, 49 (2002).
42. The entropy of a block of L spins and the scaling of it as a function of L was discussed in Ref. [20]. Following the line of thought in Ref. [28], this quantity contained the more different types of entanglement the larger is L. We consider the case where A contains only a single site in order to study the conjecture in Ref. [28].
43. 1]).
44. W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
45. S. Hill and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5022 (1997).
46. C.H. Bennett, H.J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046 (1996); V. Vedral, M.B. Plenio, M.A. Rippin, and P. Knight, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2275 (1997); C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, J. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996).
47. C.H. Bennett, H.J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046 (1996); V. Vedral, M.B. Plenio, M.A. Rippin, and P. Knight, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2275 (1997); C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, J. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996).
48. C.H. Bennett, H.J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046 (1996); V. Vedral, M.B. Plenio, M.A. Rippin, and P. Knight, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2275 (1997); C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, J. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996).
49. We omit the indices n and m here, indicating that the considered Hubert space consists of that two sites only.
50. This is in contrast to what should be observed, if the damping was related to the quantum critical point: it should depend on the size of the system in a way prescribed by the critical exponents of the system.
51. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 574 (1997); W. Wu, W. Wang, and X. X. Yi, QIC 3, 39 (2003).
52. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 574 (1997); W. Wu, W. Wang, and X. X. Yi, QIC 3, 39 (2003).
53. G. Vidal and R.F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002).
54. S. Montangero, G. Benenti, and R. Fazio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 187901 (2003).
55. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Phys. Rev. A 67, 052109 (2003); Europhys. Lett. 62, 615 (2003), and references therein.
56. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Phys. Rev. A 67, 052109 (2003); Europhys. Lett. 62, 615 (2003), and references therein.