Assessing the effectiveness of community-based substance abuse treatment for adolescents

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 27-33

  Dasinger, Lisa K ^a   Shane, Patricia A ^b   Martinovich, Zoran ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Relapse; Substance abuse; Substance use trajectories; Treatment outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENCE; ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOL ABUSE; ARTICLE; DRUG ABUSE; GROUP THERAPY; HUMAN; MODEL; RELAPSE; RESIDENTIAL CARE; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 1942474670     PISSN: 02791072     EISSN: 21599777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2004.10399721     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. American Psychiatric Association 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, Text Revision.
2. Catalano, R.F.; Hawkins, J.D.; Wells, E.A.; Miller, J. & Brewer, D. 1990-1991. Evaluation of the effectiveness of adolescent drug abuse treatment, assessment of risks for relapse, and promising approaches for relapse prevention. International Joumil of the Addictions 25 (9A & 10A): 1085-140.
3. Chou, C.P.; Hser, Y.I. & Anglin, M.D. 1998. Interaction effects of client and treatment program characteristics on retention; An exploratory analysis using hierarchical linear models. Substance Use & Misuse 33 (11): 2281-301.
4. Dennis, M.L. 1999. Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) Administration Guide for the GAIN and Related Measures (Version 1299). Bloomington, Illinois: Lighthouse Publications, Chestnut Health Systems.
5. Dennis, M.L.; Muck, R.D.; Dawud-Noursi, S. & McDermeit, M. 2003. Thee nne for developing andevaluating adolescent treatment models. In: S.J. Stevens & A.R. Morral (Eds.) Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment in the United States: Exemplary Models from a National Evaluation Study. New York: The Haworth Press.
6. Dennis, M.L.; Scott, C.K.; Godley, M.D. & Funk, R. 2000 Predicting outcomes in adult and adolescent treatment with case mix vs. level of care: Findings from the Drug Outcome Monitoring Study. Jouiml of Drug andAlcohol Dependence 60 (Supplement 1): s51.
7. Duncan, S.C.; Duncan, T.E. & Hops, H. 1996. Analysis of longitudinal data within accelerated longitudinal designs. Psychological Methods 1: 236-48.
8. Fletcher, B. W., Tims, F. M., & Brown, B. S. 1997. The Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS): Treatment evaluation research in the United States. Psychology ofAddictive Behaviors 11(4), 21629.
9. Ginzburg, H.M. 1978. Defensive research… The Treatment Outcome Prospective Study (TOPS). Annals ofthe New York Academy of Sciences 311: 265-69.
10. Greenberg, G.A.; Rosenheck, R.A. & Seibyl, C.L. 2002. Continuity of care and clinical effectiveness: Outcomes following residential treatment for severe substance abuse. Medical Care 40 (3): 246-59.
11. Hedeker, D. & Mermelstein, R.J. 2000. Analysis of longitudinal substance use outcomes using ordinal random-effects regression models. Addiction 95 (Supplement 3): S381-94.
12. Hser, Y.; Grella, C.E.; Hubbard, R.L.; Hsieh, S.; Fletcher, B.W.; Brown, B.S. & Anglin, M.D. 2001a. An evaluation of drug treatments for adolescents in 4 US cities. Archives of General Psychiatry 58: 689-95.
13. Hser, Y.; Shen, H.; Chou, C.; Messer, S.C. & Anglin, M.D. 2001b. Analytic approaches for assessing long-term treatment effects: Examples of empirical applications and findings. Evaluation Review 25 (2): 23362.
14. Hubbard, R.L.; Cavanaugh, E.R.; Craddock, S.G. & Rachal, J.V. 1985. Characteristics, behaviors, and outcomes for youth in TOPS. In A.S. Friedman & G.M. Beschner (Eds.) Treatment Services forAdolescent Substance Abusers. DHHS Publication No. ADM 85-1342. Rockville, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse, U.S. GPO.
15. Mee-Lee, D.; Shulman, G.D.; Fishman, M.; Gastfriend, D.R. & Griffith, J.H. (Eds.) 2001. ASAM Patient Placement Criteria for the Treatment of Substance-Related Disorders, Second Edition -Revised. ASAM-PPC-2R. Chevy Chase, Maryland: American Society of Addiction Medicine.
16. Mitchell, C.M.; Novins, D.K. & Holmes, T. 1999. Marijuana use among American Indian adolescents: A growth curve analysis from ages 14 through 20 years. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 38 (1): 72-78.
17. Muck, R.; Zempolich, K.A.; Titus, J.C.; Fishman, M.; Godley, M.D. & Schwebel, R. 2001. An overview of the effectiveness of adolescent substance abuse treatment models. Youth & Society 33 (2): 143-68.
18. Raudenbush, S.W. & Bryk, A.S. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
19. Rose, J.S.; Chassin, L.; Presson, C.C. & Sherman, S.J. 2000 Multivariate Applications in Substance Use Research: New Methods for New Questions. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
20. Sells, S.B. & Simpson, D.D. 1979. Evaluation of treatment outcome for youths in drug abuse reporting program (DARP): A follow-up study. In: G.M. Beschner & A.S. Friedman (Eds.) Youth Drug Abuse: Problems, Issues and Treatment. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
21. Simpson, D.D. 1993. Drug treatment evaluation in the United States. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 7: 120-28.
22. Simpson, D.D. & Sells, S.B. 1982. Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse: An overview of the DARP research program. Advances in Alcohol and Substance Abuse 2: 7-29.
23. Stevens, S.J. & Morral, A.R. (Eds) 2003. Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment in the United States: Exemplary Models from a National Evaluation Study. Binghamton, New York: Haworth Press.
24. Williams, R.; Chang, S. & Addiction Centre Adolescent Research Group. 2000. A comprehensive and comparative review of adolescent substance abuse and treatment outcome. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 7: 138-66.
25. Winters, K.C.; Stinchfield, R.D.; Opland, E.; Weller, C. & Latimer, W.M. 2000. The effectiveness of the Minnesota Model approach in the treatment of adolescent drug abusers. Addiction 95 (4): 601-12.