Adolescent and young adult heroin and non heroin users: A quantitative and qualitative study of experiences in a therapeutic community

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 75-84

  Perry, Patricia D ^a   Duroy, Tanya L Hedges ^a  

^a Res Found for Mental Hygiene Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent; Heroin; Therapeutic community

Indexed keywords

DIAMORPHINE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEROIN DEPENDENCE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELAPSE; SELF CONCEPT; SELF REPORT;

EID: 1942474648     PISSN: 02791072     EISSN: 21599777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2004.10399725     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Agar, M. 1973. Ripping and Running: A Formal Ethnography of Urban Heroin Addicts. New York: Seminar Press.
2. Ball, J.C. & Chambers, C.D. (Eds.) 1970. The Epidemiology of Opiate Addiction in the United States. Available at: www.drugtext.org/library/books/epidemiology.
3. Bamberger, M. 2000 Directions in Development Series: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Development Projects. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
4. Blaine, J.O. (Ed). 1992. Buprenorphine: An Alternative Treatment for Opioid Dependence. NIDA Research Monograph 121. DHHS Pub. No. (ADM) 92-1912. Rockville, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
5. Bureau of Applied Studies. 1998. The OASAS School Survey: Alcohol and Other Drug Use Among 5th-12th GradeStudents. Albany: New York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. 2001. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS). Available at: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/YRBSS.
7. Center for Substance Abuse treatment (CSAT). 2002. Working files, Adolescent Treatment Models, Cross-Site Analysis Workgroup meeting, June 27-28.
8. Courtwright, D.; Joseph, H. & Des Jarlais, D. 1989. Addicts Who Survived: An Oral History of Narcotic Use in America, 1923-1965. Knoxville, Tennessee: University of Tennessee.
9. Crome, I.B.; Christian, J. & Green, C. 2000 The development of a unique designed community drug service for adolescents. Drugs— Education, Prevention and Policy 1: 87-108.
10. De Leon, G. 2000. The Therapeutic Community: Theory, Model and Method. New York: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.
11. DeLeon, G. (Ed.). 1997. Community as Method: Therapeutic Communities for Special Populations and Special Settings. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
12. Dennis, M.L. 1999. Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN). Administration Guide for the Gain and Related Measures (Version 1299). Bloomington, Illinois: Lighthouse Publications. Also available at www.chestnut.org/LI/gain.
13. Dennis, M.L.; Scott, C.K. & Funk, R. 2003. An experimental evaluation of recovery management checkups (RMC) for people with chronic substance use disorders. Evaluation and Program Planning 26: 33952.
14. Dennis, M.L.; McDermeit, M. & Funk, R. 2002. Tables for Adolescent Treatment Models Study (ATMIMASC) Inteirnal Working Document. Bloomington, Illinois: Chestnut Health Systems.
15. Dennis, M.L.; Fetterman, D.M. & Sechrest, L. 1994. Integrating qualitative and quantitative evaluation methods in substance abuse research. Education and Program Planning 17 (4): 419-27.
16. Dennis, M.L.; Dawud-Noursi, S.; Muck, R.D. & McDermeit, M. 2002. The need for developing andevaluating adolescent treatment models. In: S.J. Stevens & A.R. Morral (Eds.) Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment in the United States: Exemplary Modelsfrom a National Evaluation Study. Binghamton, New York: Haworth Press.
17. Dennis, M.L.; Titus, J.C.; Diamond, G.; Donaldson, J.; Godley, S.H.; Tims, F.M.; Webb, C.; Kaminer, Y.; Babor, T.; Roebuck, M.C.; Godley, M.D.; Hamilton, N.; Liddle, H.; Scott, C.K. & CYT Steering Committee. 2002. The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) experiment: Rationale, study design, and analysis plans. Addiction 97 (Suppl. 1): S16-S34.
18. Dennis, M.L.; Scott, C.K.; Godley, M.D. & Funk, R. 1999. Comparisons of Adolescents and Adults by ASAM Profiile Using Gain Data from the Drug Outcome Monitoring Study (DOMS): Preliminary Data Tables. Bloomington, Illinois: Chestnut Health Systems.
19. Epstein, J.F. & Gfroerer, J.C. 2003. Heroin Abuse in the United States. Rockville, Maryland: Office of Applied Studies, U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Available at: www.sarnhsa.gov/oas/NHSDA/treatan/treana11.htm.
20. Gordon, S.M. 2002. Surprising data on young heroin users. Brown University Child and Adolescent Behavior Letter 18 (11): 1-2.
21. Hanson, B.; Beschner, G.; Walters, J.M. & Bovelle, E. (Eds). 1985. Life With Heroin: Voicesfrom the Inner City. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
22. Hopfer, C. J.; Mikulich, S.K. & Crowley, T.J. 2000. Heroin use among adolescents in treatment for substance use disorders. Journal of the Amemm At^cademy of Child (and Aildkscent Psychiatry 39 (10): 1316-23.
23. Hopfer, C.J.; Khuri, E.; Crowley, T.J. & Hooks, S. 2002. Adolescent heroin use: A review of the descriptive and treatment literature. Journtl of Substance Abuse Treatment 23: 231-7.
24. Marion, I.J. (Ed.) 1995. LAAM in the Treatment of Opiate Addiction: Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series #22. DHHS Pub. No. (SMA)95-3052. Rockville, Maryland: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
25. McDermeit, M.; Dennis, M.L. & Funk, R. 2001. Baseline Psychometrics Data Tables From Adolescent Treatment Models Study (ATM/MASC): Internal Working Document. Bloomington, Illinois: Chestnut Health Systems.
26. National Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC). 2002. New York Drug Threat Assessment. Washington, D.C.: US Depsent of Justice. Available at: www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs2/2580/heroin.htre.
27. Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services, State of New York (OASAS). 2000. Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations. Albany, New York: OASAS. Available at: www.oasas.state.ny.us/regs/828.htm.
28. Prochaska, J.; Norcross, J. & DiClemente, C. 1994. Changing for the Good. New York: Avon Books.
29. Qualitative Solutions and Research, Pty. Ltd. 1999. NVIVO. Bundoora, Victoria, Australia: Qualitative Solutions and Research Pty. Ltd.
30. Rapaka, R.S. & Sorer, H. (Eds.) 1995. Discovery of Novel Opioid Medications. NIDA Research Monograph Series #147. NIH Pub. No. 95-3887. Rockville, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
31. Sells, S.B. & Simpson, D.D. 1979. Evaluation of treatment outcome for youths in the drug abuse reporting program (DARP): A follow-up study. In: G.M. Beschner & A.S. Friedman (Eds.) Youth Drug Abuse: Problems, Issues And Treatment. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
32. Stevens, S.J. & Morral, A.R. (Eds.) 2003. Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment in the United States: Exemplary Modelsfrom a National Evaluation Study. Binghamton, New York: Haworth Press.
33. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applies Studies. 2002. Emergency Department Trends from the Drug Abuse Warning Network, Final Estimates 19994-2MI. DAWN Series D-21, DHHS Publication #(SMA) 02-3635. Rockville, Maryland: SAMHSA.
34. White, W. 1998. Slaying the Dragon: The History of Addiction Treatment and Recovery in America. Bloomington, Illinois: Chestnut Health Systems/Lighthouse Institute.
35. Zickler, P. 1999. High-dose methadone improves treatment outcomes. NIDA Notes: Focus on Treatment Research 14 (5).