Prediction of flow in mix-proof valve by use of CFD - Validation by LDA

Journal of Food Process Engineering

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 65-85

  Jensen, Bo B B ^a   Friis, Alan ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ANEMOMETERS; CLEANING; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DOPPLER EFFECT; HYDRODYNAMICS; KINEMATICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBES; REYNOLDS NUMBER; VALVES (MECHANICAL); VELOCITY MEASUREMENT;

HYGIENIC DESIGN; MIX-PROOF VALVE (MPV);

FOOD PROCESSING;

MOROCCAN PEPPER VIRUS;

EID: 1942471763     PISSN: 01458876     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4530.2004.tb00623.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. ANDERSEN, E.S., JESPERSGAARD, P. and ØSTERGAARD, O.G. 1984. Databog Fysik & Kemi, 4th Ed., F & K Forlaget, Copenhagen.
2. BATES, C.J. 1977. Laser doppler anemometry measurements in water flows. J. Phys. E. Sci. Instrum. 10, 669-675.
3. CASEY, M. and WINTERGERSTE, T. 2000. ERCOFTAC Special Interest Group on "Quality and Trust in Industrial CFD" - Best Practice Guide (ed. 1.0). ERCOFTAC, www.ercoftac.org
4. CELIK, I. and SHAFFER, F. 1995. Long time-average solutions of turbulent flow past a circular cylinder. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 56, 185-212.
5. CHEN, H.C. and PATEL, V.C. 1988. Near-wall turbulence models for complex flows including separation. AIAA-Journal 26, 7-12.
6. Computational Dynamics. 1999. Methodology Manual (on-line) (ver. 3.10A), CD Adapco Group (www.cd-adapco.com)
7. DRAIN, L.E. 1980. The Laser Doppler Technique, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
8. EHEDG, 2001. Hygienic design and safe use of double-seat mixproof valves. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 72, 203-206.
9. HAUSER, G. and KRÜS, H. 2000. Hygienegebrechte Gestaltung von Bauteilen für die Lebensmittelherstellung - Schwachstellenanalyse durch Tests und numerische Berechungen., www.cyclone.nl.
10. JENSEN, B.B.B. and FRIIS, A. 2004. Predicting the cleanability of Mix-Proof Values by use of Wall Shear Stress. J. Food Process Engineering. Submitted.
11. KREYSZIG, E. 1993. Advanced Engineering Mathematics, 7th Ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
12. LAUNDER, B.E. and SPALDING, D.B. 1974. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 3, 269-289.
13. LEVI, L. 1968. Applied Optics - A Guide to Optical System Design. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
14. NORRIS, L.H. and REYNOLDS, W.C. 1975. Turbulent Channel Flow with a Moving Wavy Boundary. FM-10, Stanford University, Calif.
15. PATANKAR, S.V. 1980. Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. Hemisphere Pub. Corp., New York.
16. RICHARDSON, P.S., GEORGE, R.M. and THORN, R.D. 2001. Application of computational fluid dynamics simulation to the modelling of cleanability of food processing equipment. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress on Engineering and Food (ICEF8), 1854-1858. Technomic Publishing, Lancaster, Penn.
17. RODI, W. 1991. Experience with Two-Layer Models Combining the k-ε Model with a One-equation Model Near the Wall. AIAA-91-0216, 1-12.
18. SHAMES, I.H. 1992. Mechanics of Fluids, (Ed. 1). McGraw-Hill, New York.
19. SORENSEN, G. and BORREMANS, E. 2000. MixProof valve selection in the brewing industry. Brew. Distill. Intern. July, 20-21.
20. STEVENSON, M.J. and CHEN, X.D. 1997. Visualization of the flow patterns in a high-pressure homogenizing valve using a CFD package. J. Food Eng. 33, 151-166.
21. TIMPERLEY, A.W. et al. 2000. A method for the assessment of in-place cleanability of food processing equipment. EHEDG, 2nd Ed., March 1-14.
22. TUCKER, G. and HALL, J. 1998. Computational fluid dynamics as an aid to efficient, hygienic design of food processing equipment. Food Rev. June, 10-12.
23. VERSTEEG, H.K. and MALALASEKERA, W. 1995. An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics - The Finite Volume Method (1st Ed.). Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, England.
24. WILCOX, D.C. 1998. Turbulence Modelling for CFD (2nd Ed.) DCW Industries, La Canada, California.