In Search of Reflective Behavior and Shared Understanding in Ad Hoc Expert Teams

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 141-154

  Mulder, Ingrid ^a,c   Swaak, Janine ^a   Kessels, Joseph ^b  

^a TELEMATICA INSTITUUT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; BEHAVIOR; CONFERENCE PAPER; GROUP DYNAMICS; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEARNING; SOCIAL INTERACTION; TEAMWORK; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ADULT; AFFECT; COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EDUCATION, DISTANCE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; LEARNING; MENTAL PROCESSES; NETHERLANDS; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; REMOTE CONSULTATION; SOFTWARE; UNITED STATES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 1942453720     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/109493104323024410     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Fischer, G. (2001). Lifelong learning and its support with new media. In: Smelser, N.J., & Baltes, P.B. (eds.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences. New York: Elsevier, pp. 8836-8840.
2. Clark, H.H., & Brennan, S.E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In: Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M., & Teasley, S.D. (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 127-149.
3. Stahl, G. (2002). Introduction: foundations for a CSCL community. In: Stahl, G., (ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: foundations for a CSCL community. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1-2.
4. Stahl, G. (2003). Meaning and interpretation in collaboration. In: Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., & Hoppe, U. (eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 523-532.
5. Gramsbergen, Y.H., & van der Molen, H.T. (1992). Gesprekken in organisaties [Conversations in organizations]. Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.
6. Veerman, A. (2000). Computer-supported collaborative learning through argumentation. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University.
7. Van der Meij, H., & Boersma, K. (2002). E-mail use in elementary school: an analysis of exchange patterns and content. British Journal of Educational Technology 33:189-200.
8. Mäkitalo, K., & Häkkinen, P. (2001). The mechanisms of common ground: the qualitative analysis of web-based interaction. Presented at the 3rd Conference of the Information Research Programme, Tampere, Finland.
9. Mäkitalo, K., Salo, P., Häkkinen, P., et al. (2001). Analyzing the mechanism of common ground in collaborative web-based interaction. In: Dillenbourg, P., Eurelings, A., & Hakkarainen, K. (eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning. Maastricht, The Netherlands: University of Maastricht, pp. 445-453.
10. Norman, D.A. (1993). Things that make us smart: defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
11. Van der Meij, H. (2000, May 17). Personal communication.
12. Krauss, R.M., & Fussell, S.R. (1991). Constructing shared communicative environments. In: Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M., & Teasley, S.D. (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 172-200.
13. Schober, M.F., & Clark, H.H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology 21:211-232.
14. Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., et al. (1999). The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In: Dillenbourg, P. (ed.), Collaborative learning: cognitive and computational approaches. Amsterdam: Pergamon/Elsevier Science, pp. 31-63.
15. Ruhleder, K., & Jordan, B. (2001). Co-constructing non-mutual realities: delay-generated trouble in distributed interaction. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 10:113-138.
16. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
17. Anderson, A.H., O'Malley, C., Doherty-Sneddon, G., et al. (1997). The impact of VMC on collaborative problem solving: an analysis of task performance, communicative process, and user satisfaction. In: Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., & Wilbur, S.B. (eds.), Video-mediated communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 133-155.
18. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19. Van der Meij, H., De Vries, B., Boersma, K., Pieters, J., & Wegerif, R. (2004). An examination of interactional coherence in email use in elementary school. Computers in Human Behavior (in press).
20. Snow, R.E. (1989). Toward assessment of cognitive and conative structures in learning. The Educational Researcher 18:8-14.
21. Bales, R.F. (1950). Interaction process analysis; a method for the study of small groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, F.P. (1987). Joining together: groups theory and groups skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: entice-Hall.
23. Remmerswaal, J. (1982). Groepsdynamika II [Group dynamics II]. Baarn: Nelissen.
24. Steinfield, C., Jang, C.Y., Pfaff, B. (1999). Supporting virtual team collaboration: the TeamSCOPE system. In: Hayne, S.C. (ed.), GROUP'99, Proceedings of the Group'99 conference. Phoenix, AZ: ACM Press, pp. 81-90.
25. Mulder, I., Swaak, J., & Kessels, J. (2002). Assessing group learning and shared understanding in technology-mediated interaction. Educational Technology & Society 5:35-47.
26. Mulder, I. (1999). Understanding technology-mediated interaction processes: a theoretical context (Rep. No. TI/RS/99042). Enschede, The Netherlands: Telematica Instituut.
27. Mulder, I. (2000). Coding scheme and manual: how to code content, relation, and process aspects of technology-mediated group interaction? (Rep. No. TI/RS/2000/099). Enschede, The Netherlands: Telematica Instituut.
28. Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-174.
29. Mulder, I., Swaak, J., & Kessels, J. (2003). Designing appropriate technology for group learning. In: Jacko, J., & Stephanidis, C. (eds.), Human-computer interaction: theory and practice (part I). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 981-985.
30. Mulder, I., Graner, M., Swaak, J., et al. (2003). Stimulating questioning behavior: a study on learning and understanding in video-based design teams. In: Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., Hoppe, U. (eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 421-430.
31. Gunawardena, C.N., Lowe, C.A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research 17:397-431.
32. Veldhuis-Diermanse, A.E. (2002). CSC learning? Participation, learning activities and knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen University.
33. Ludvigsen, S., & Morch, A. (2003). Categorisation in knowledge building. In: Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., & Hoppe, U. (eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 67-76.
34. Van der Pol, J., Admiraal, W., & Simons, R.J. (2003). Grounding in electronic discussion: Standard (threaded) versus anchored discussion. In: Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., & Hoppe, U. (eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 77-81.
35. Reiserer, M., Ertl, B., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction in desktop video-conferencing: effects of content schemes and cooperation scripts in peer teaching settings. In: Stahl, G., (ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: foundations for a CSCL community. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 379-388.
36. Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2002). Facilitating knowledge convergence in videoconferencing environments: the role of external representation tools. In: Stahl, G. (ed.) Computer support for collaborative learning: foundations for a CSCL community. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 623-624.
37. Price, S., Rogers, Y., Stanton, D., et al. (2003). A new conceptual framework for CSCL: supporting diverse forms of reflection through multiple interactions. In: Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., & Hoppe, U. (eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 513-522.
38. Fischer, G. (2003). Working and learning when the answer is not known. Presented at the 8th European Conference of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW2003), Helsinki, Finland.
39. Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., & Mäkitalo, K. (2003). Sharing perspectives in virtual interaction: review of methods of analysis. In: Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., & Hoppe, U. (eds). Designing for change in networked learning environments. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 395-404.