Oral brush biopsy: False positives redux [1]

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 419-

  Slater, Lee J ^a  

^a Scripps Oral Pathology Service   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER RISK; DENTIST; EPITHELIUM DYSPLASIA; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LETTER; MOUTH CANCER; ORAL BIOPSY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BIOPSY; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; MOUTH NEOPLASMS;

EID: 1942452863     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.01.008     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Frist S. The oral brush biopsy: Separating fact from fiction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 96:2003;654-655.
2. Eisen D., Frist S. Efficacy of the brush biopsy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 61:2003;1237.
3. Sciubba J.J. Improving detection of precancerous and cancerous oral lesions. Computer-assisted analysis of the oral brush biopsy. J Am Dent Assoc. 130:1999;1445-1457.
4. Rick G.M., Slater L.J. Oral brush biopsy: The problem of false positives. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 96:2003;252.
5. Potter T.J., Summerlin D.-J., Campbell J.H. Oral malignancies associated with negative transepithelial brush biopsy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 61:2003;674-677.