Associations with Minspeak™ icons

Journal of Communication Disorders

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 255-274

  Van Der Merwe, Elmarie ^a   Alant, Erna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Associations; Augmentative and alternative communication; Iconic encoding; Icons; Minspeak ; Rate enhancement; Unity ; Vocabulary

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DATA ANALYSIS; EDUCATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOUTH AFRICA; SPEECH; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; ADOLESCENT; COMMUNICATION AID; FEMALE; MALE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SEMANTICS; SPEECH DISORDER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMMUNICATION AIDS FOR DISABLED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEMANTICS; SOUTH AFRICA; SPEECH DISORDERS; VERBAL LEARNING; VOCABULARY;

EID: 1942452844     PISSN: 00219924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2003.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baker, B., & Barry, R. (1990). A mathematical model of Minspeak™. In Proceedings of the Second Annual European Minspeak™ Conference. Mansfield, England.
2. Bernstein, B. (1973). Class, codes and control. In: Towards a theory of educational transmissions (Vol. 3, 2nd ed.). London.
3. Bersani, H., Jr. (1999). Nothing about me without me: A proposal for participatory action research in AAC. In F. T. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. H. Arvidson, & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: New directions in research and practice (pp. 278-289). London: Whurr Publishers.
4. Blackstone, S. (1993). Augmentative communication news, 6(2).
5. Bridges, S., & Midgette, T. (2000). Clinical management of communication disorders in culturally diverse children. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Bruno J. Customizing a Minspeak™ system for a preliterate child: A case example. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 5(2):1989;89-100.
7. Bruno J., Goehl H. Comparison of picture and word association performance in adults and preliterate children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 7(2):1991;70-79.
8. Collins, J. J. (1975). Anthropology: Culture, society and evolution. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Deregowski J.B. Pictorial recognition in subjects from a relatively pictureless environment. African Social Research. 5:1968;356-364.
11. Deregowski, J. B. (1980). Illusions, patterns and pictures: A cross cultural perspective. London: Academic Press.
12. Elder, P., Goossens', C., & Bray, N. (1989). Semantic compaction proficiency profile. Birmingham, AL: Southeast Augmentative Communication Conference Publications.
13. Ellis, A., & Beattie, G. (1986). The psychology of language and communication. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
14. Glennen, S. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication assessment strategies. In S. L. Glennen & D. DeCoste (Eds.), The handbook of augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 149-192). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
15. Grandy, R. E. (1987). In defense of semantic fields. In E. LePore (Ed.), New directions in semantics (pp. 259-280). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday Garden City.
17. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Huer M.B. Examining perceptions of graphic symbols across cultures: Preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 16(3):2000;180-185.
19. Kittay, C. F. (1987). Metaphor: Its cognitive and linguistic structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20. Lehrer, A. (1974). Semantic fields and lexical structure. Amsterdam: North Holland.
21. Nelson K. Syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift. Psychological Bulletin. 84(1):1977;93-116.
22. Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23. Palermo D. Characteristics of word association responses obtained from children in grades one through four. Developmental Psychology. 5:1971;118-123.
24. Petry S. Word associations and the development of lexical memory. Cognition. 5(1):1977;57-71.
25. Pollio H. Some semantic relations among word associates. American Journal of Psychology. 67(3):1964;199-208.
26. Prentke Romich Company. (1998). Look who's really talking (CD-ROM). Wooster, OH: Prenke Romich Company.
27. Quist, R. W., & Lloyd, L. L. (1997). Principles and uses of technology. In L. L. Lloyd, D. R. Fuller, & H. H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices (pp. 107-126). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
28. Seymour, H. N. (1986). Clinical principles for language intervention for language disorders among nonstandard speakers of English. In O. L. Taylor (Ed.), Treatment of communication disorders in culturally and linguistically diverse populations (pp. 115-133). New York: College Hill.
29. South African Speech-Language and Hearing Association Ethics and Standards Committee. (1998). Code of ethics. Pretoria, South Africa: SASLHA.
30. Thipa, H. M. (1980). Semantic field analysis and the structure of culture: A comparative study of Sotho and Xhosa. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Rhodes University, South Africa.
31. Valot Klotz, L. S. (1997). BUILLD™ (bringing unity into language and learning development) customized vocabulary sort. Wooster, OH: Prentke Romich Company.
32. Van Tatenhove, G. (1993). What is Minspeak™? Wooster, OH: Prentke Romich Company.
33. World Health Organization. (2000). World Health Report 2000 [On-line]. Available: http://filestore.who.int/∼who/whr/2000.