An emerging framework for human becoming criticism

Nursing Science Quarterly

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 103-109

  Mitchell, Gail J ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Hermeneutics; Human becoming; Literary theory; Parse; Scholarly critique

Indexed keywords

ART; COMMUNITY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PHILOSOPHY; REVIEW; THEORY;

EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; HUMANS; MEDICINE IN ART; MEDICINE IN LITERATURE; MODELS, NURSING; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING THEORY; PHILOSOPHY, NURSING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 1942445358     PISSN: 08943184     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894318404263371     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Baumann, S. L. (1999). Art as a path of inquiry. Nursing Science Quarterly, 12, 106-110.
2. Bernstein, R. J. (1988). Beyond objectivism and relativism. Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
3. Bunkers, S. S. (2000). Simple things: Writing of human becoming. Sioux Falls, SD: Pine Hill.
4. Burns, N. (1989). Standards for qualitative research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 2, 44-52.
5. Cody, W. K. (1995). Of life immense in passion, pulse, and power: Dialoging with Whitman and Parse, a hermeneutic study. In R. R. Parse (Ed.), Illuminations: The human becoming theory in practice and research (pp. 269-307). New York: National League for Nursing.
6. Cody, W. K. (2002). Lyrical language and nursing discourse: Can science be the tool of love? Nursing Science Quarterly, 15, 98-106.
7. Collier, P., & Geyer-Ryan, H. (Eds.). (1990). Literary theory today. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8. Crane, R. S. (1952). Critics and criticism: Ancient and modern. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Crease, R. P. (1993). Science as foundational? In H. J. Silverman (Ed.), Questioning foundations. Truth/subjectivity/culture (pp. 44-60). New York: Routledge.
10. Cuddon, J. A. (1999). The Penguin dictionary of literary terms and literary theory (4th ed.). London, England: Penguin.
11. Emden, C., & Sandelowski, M. (1999). The good, the bad and the relative, part two: Goodness and the criterion problem in qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 5, 2-7.
12. Ermarth, M. (1978). Wilhelm Dilthey: The critique of historical reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Fish, S. E. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed., J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). New York: Crossroad. (Original work published 1960)
15. Guerin, W. L., Labor, E., Morgan, L., Reesman, J. C., & Willingham, J. R. (1999). A handbook of critical approaches to literature (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.
17. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading. A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18. Jauss, H. R. (1982). Literary history as a challenge to literary theory. In H. R. Jauss, Towards an aesthetics of reception (pp. 3-45). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19. Jauss, H. R. (1990). The theory of reception: A retrospective of its unrecognized prehistory (J. Whitlam, Trans.). In P. Collier & H. Geyer-Ryan (Eds.), Literary theory today (pp. 53-73). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20. Jefferson, A. (1982). Russian formalism. In A. Jefferson & D. Robey (Eds.), Modern literary theory: A comparative introduction (pp. 1-37). London, England: Batsford Academic and Educational.
21. Jefferson, A., & Robey, D. (Eds.). (1982). Modern literary theory: A comparative introduction. London, England: Batsford Academic and Educational.
22. Jonas-Simpson, C. M. (2003). The experience of being listened to: A human becoming study with music. Nursing Science Quarterly, 16, 232-238.
23. Krieger, M. (1976). Theory of criticism. A tradition and its system. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24. Makaryk, I. R. (Ed.). (1993). Encylopedia of contemporary literary theory. Approaches, scholars, terms. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
25. Malinski, V. M. (2003). Questions commonly asked about research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 16, 16-20.
26. McKeon, R. (1957). The philosophic bases of art and criticism. In R. S. Crane (Ed.), Critics and criticism: Ancient and modern (pp. 191-273). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Mitchell, G. J., & Cody, W. K. (2002). Ambiguous opportunity: Toiling for truth of nursing art and science. Nursing Science Quarterly, 15, 71-79.
28. O'Connor, T. (1993). Intentionality, ontology, and empirical thought. In H. J. Silverman (Ed.), Questioning foundations. Truth/subjectivity/culture (pp. 98-109). New York: Routledge.
29. Parse, R. R. (1981). Man-living-health: A theory of nursing. New York: John Wiley.
30. Parse, R. R. (1987). Nursing science. Major paradigms, theories, and critiques. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
31. Parse, R. R. (1994). Quality of life: Sciencing and living the art of human becoming. Nursing Science Quarterly, 7, 16-21.
32. Parse, R. R. (Ed.). (1995). Illuminations: The human becoming theory in practice and research. New York: National League for Nursing.
33. Parse, R. R. (1998a). The art of criticism. Nursing Science Quarterly, 11, 43.
34. Parse, R. R. (1998b). The human becoming school of thought: A perspective for nurses and other health professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Parse, R. R. (1999). Hope: An international human becoming perspective. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
36. Parse, R. R. (2000). Language: Words reflect and cocreate meaning. Nursing Science Quarterly, 13, 187.
37. Parse, R. R. (2001). Qualitative inquiry: The path of sciencing. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
38. Parse, R. R. (2003a). Community: A human becoming perspective. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
39. Parse, R. R. (2003b, July). Human becoming research methods. Paper presented at the Institute of Human Becoming, Pittsburgh, PA.
40. Ransom, J. C. (1941). The new criticism. Norfolk, CT: New Directions.
41. Richards, I. A. (1959). Principles of literary criticism (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
42. Robey, D. (1982a). Anglo-American new criticism. In A. Jefferson & D. Robey (Eds.), Modern literary theory: A comparative introduction (pp. 65-83). London, England: Batsford Academic and Educational.
43. Robey, D. (1982b). Modern linguistics and the language of literature. In A. Jefferson & D. Robey (Eds.), Modern literary theory: A comparative introduction (pp. 38-64). London, England: Batsford Academic and Educational.
44. Sandelowski, M. (1993). Rigor or rigor mortis: The problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Advances in Nursing Science, 16(2), 1-8.
45. Sandelowski, M. (1995). On the aesthetics of qualitative research. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 27, 205-209.
46. Sandelowski, M. (1997). "To be of use": Enhancing the utility of qualitative research. Nursing Outlook, 45(3), 125-132.
47. Silva, M. C., Sorrell, J. M., & Sorrell, C. D. (1995). From Carper's patterns of knowing to ways of being: An ontological philosophical shift in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 18(1), 1-13.
48. Wilson, E. O. (1999). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage.