Mixture of multiple copies of maximally entangled states is quasipure

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 243021-243023

  Yang, Dong ^a   Chen, Yi Xin ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY; CONTINUUM MECHANICS; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; QUANTUM THEORY;

LOCAL BASIS TRANSFORMATION; MAXIMALLY ENTANGLED STATES (MES);

QUANTUM OPTICS;

EID: 1942442884     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, J.A. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996).
2. E.M. Rains, Phys. Rev. A 60, 173 (1999); 60, 179 (1999).
3. E.M. Rains, Phys. Rev. A 60, 173 (1999); 60, 179 (1999).
4. C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, C.A. Fuchs, T. Mor, E. Rains, P.W. Shor, J.A. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1070 (1999).
5. J. Walgate, A. Short, L. Hardy, and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4972 (2000).
6. S. Ghosh, G. Kar, A. Roy, A. Sen (De), and U. Sen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 277902 (2001).
7. Y.-X. Chen, J.-S. Jin, and D. Yang, Phys. Rev. A 67, 014302 (2003).
8. G. Vidai and J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5803 (2001); Phys. Rev. A 65, 012323 (2002); G. Vidai, W. Dur, and J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 027901 (2002).
9. G. Vidai and J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5803 (2001); Phys. Rev. A 65, 012323 (2002); G. Vidai, W. Dur, and J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 027901 (2002).
10. G. Vidai and J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5803 (2001); Phys. Rev. A 65, 012323 (2002); G. Vidai, W. Dur, and J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 027901 (2002).
11. K.G.H. Vollbrecht, R.F. Werner, and M.M. Wolf, e-print quant-ph/0301072.
12. S. Hamieh and H. Zaraket, e-print quant-ph/0304107. This paper calculates the distillable entanglement of the mixture of the form Eq. (1). However, the calculation is based on an incorrect result of Ref. [10] as pointed out in Ref. [6]. As a consequence, it is incorrect.
13. J.A. Smolin, Phys. Rev. A 63, 032306 (2000).