Carotid arteriography: Still golden after all these years?

Neurology

Volumn 62, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1246-1247

  Powers, William J ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTERY OCCLUSION; BLOOD FLOW; CALCULATION; CAROTID ARTERIOGRAPHY; CAROTID ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EDITORIAL; ENDARTERECTOMY; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENOSIS;

EID: 1942441772     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.62.8.1246     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Sellar RJ. Cerebral angiographic risk in mild cerebrovascular disease. Stroke 1990;21:209-222.
2. Davies KN, Humphrey PR. Complications of cerebral angiography in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia screened by carotid ultrasound. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:967-972.
3. Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutinkov SA, et al. Analysis of pooled data from the randomized controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 2003;361:107-116.
4. U-King-Im JM, Trivedi RA, Graves MJ, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for carotid disease: diagnostic and potential clinical impact. Neurology 2004;62:1282-1290.
5. Turner WH, Murie JA. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography for extracranial carotid artery disease. Br J Surg 1989;76:1247-1250.
6. Howard G, Chambless LE, Baker WH, et al. A multicenter validation study of Doppler ultrasound versus angiography. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 1991;1:166-173.