Evaluation of a GP practice based homeopathy service

Homeopathy

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 67-70

  Slade, Karen ^a   Chohan, B P S ^b   Barker, Peter J ^a  

^a Christchurch House   (United Kingdom)

^b Forum Health Centre   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Effectiveness; General practice; Homeopathy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICE; HOMEOPATHY; PRESCRIPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIOECONOMICS; WELLBEING;

EID: 1942423669     PISSN: 14754916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2004.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Vickers A, Zollman C. ABC of complementary medicine: homeopathy. Bri Med J 1999; 319: 1115-1118.
2. Thomas K, Nicholl J, Coleman P. Use and expenditure on complementary medicine in England: a population based survey. Complement Ther Med 2001; 9: 2-11.
3. Paterson C. Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared to the SF-36 health survey. Br Med J 1996; 312: 1012-1016.
4. The Faculty of Homeopathy. Integrated Homeopathic Medicine: a Guide for the NHS, Faculty of Homeopathy, January 2003.
5. Hills D. Glastonbury Health Centre Complementary Medicine Service, www.integrated health.org.uk/ih-arrive.html (accessed June 2003).
6. Soloman D. Newcastle PCT Pilot Integrated Complementary Therapies Project. Conference Presentation: Developing Clinical Governance for Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Primary Care-The costs and benefits of CAM in primary care. King's Fund, London, 19 June 2003.