Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones: A multivariate analysis model

Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 161-167

  Abdel Khalek, Mohamed ^a   Sheir, Khaled Z ^a   Mokhtar, Alaa A ^a   Eraky, Ibrahiem ^a   Kenawy, Mahmoud ^a   Bazeed, Mahmoud ^a  

^a MANSOURA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; Prognostic factors; Renal calculi

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONOTHERAPY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETREATMENT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STONE ANALYSIS; STUDENT T TEST; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; LITHOTRIPSY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 1942422227     PISSN: 00365599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00365590310022626     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cohen TD, Preminger GM. Management of calyceal calculi. Urol Clin North Am 1997; 24: 81-96.
2. Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Steele B, Nyhuis A, Woods JR. Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis. J Urol 1994; 151: 663-7.
3. Ilker Y, Tarcan T, Akdas A. When should one perform shock wave lithotripsy for lower caliceal stones? J Endourol 1995; 9: 439-41.
4. Chen RN, Streem SB. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower pole calculi: long-term radiographic and clinical outcome. J Urol 1996; 156: 1572-5.
5. Zanetti G, Montanari E, Mandressi A, Guarneri A, Ceresoli A, Mazza L, et al. Long term results of extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy in renal stone treatment. J Endourol 1991; 5: 61-4.
6. Sampaio FJ, D'Anunciacao AL, Silva EC. Comparative follow-up of patients with acute and obtuse infundibulum-pelvic angle submitted to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower caliceal stones: preliminary report and proposed study design. J Endourol 1997; 11: 157-61.
7. Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL, Hoeig DM, Elashry OM, Smith DS, McDougall EM, et al. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol 1998; 159: 676-82.
8. Gupta NP, Singh DV, Hemal AK, Mandal S. Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 2000; 163: 24-7.
9. Madbouly K, Sheir KZ, Elsobky E. Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction? J Urol 2001; 165: 1415-8.
10. Tuckey J, Devasia A, Murthy L, Ramsden P, Thomas D. Is there a simpler method for predicting lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy than measuring infundibulopelvic angle? J Endourol 2000; 14: 475-8.
11. Fetner CD, Preminger GM, Seger J, Lea TA. Treatment of ureteric calculi by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy at multi-user center. J Urol 1988; 139: 1192-5.
12. Rassweiler J, Alken P. ESWL '90 - state of the art. Limitations and future trends of shock-wave lithotripsy. Urol Res 1990; 18 (Suppl 1): s13-s23.
13. Newman DM, Scott JW, Lingeman JE. Two year follow-up of patients treated with extra-coporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Endourol 1988; 2: 163-71.
14. Pacik D, Hanak T, Kumstat P, Turjanica M, Jelinek P, Kladensky J. Effectiveness of ESWL for lower-pole caliceal nephrolithiasis: evaluation of 452 cases. J Endourol 1997; 11: 305-7.
15. Rassweiler JJ, Renner C, Chaussy C, Thuroff S. Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: an update. Eur Urol 2001; 39: 187-99.
16. Lalak NJ, Moussa SA, Smith G, Tolley DA. The Dornier compact Delta lithotripter: the first 500 renal calculi. J Endourol 2002; 16: 3-7.
17. Sorensen CM, Chandhoke PS. Is lower pole caliceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones? J Urol 2002; 168: 2377-82.
18. Rassweiler J, Köhrmann KU, Alken P. ESWL, including imaging. Curr Opin Urol 1992; 2: 291-9.
19. Tolon M, Miroglu C, Erol H, Tolon J, Acar D, Bazmanoglu E, et al. A report on extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy results on 1,569 units in an outpatient clinic. J Urol 1991; 145: 695-8.
20. Coz F, Orvieto M, Bustos M, Lyng R, Stein C, Hinrichs A, et al. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of 2000 urinary calculi with the modulith SL-20: success and failure according to size and location of stones. J Endourol 2000; 14: 239-46.
21. Obek C, Onal B, Kantay K, Kalkan M, Yalcin V, Oner A, et al. The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi. J Urol 2001; 166: 2081-5.
22. Ackermann DK, Fuhrimann R, Pfluger D, Studer UE, Zingg EJ. Prognosis after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of radiopaque renal calculi: a multivariate analysis. Eur Urol 1994; 25: 105-9.
23. Poulakis V, Witzsch U, Remplick J, Sihler S, Becht E. Prediction of calculus clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of calculi in the inferior kidney calices. Application of the artificial neural network. Urologe A 2002; 41: 583-95.
24. Poulakis V, Dahm P, Witzsch U, de Vries R, Remplik J, Becht E. Prediction of lower pole stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy using an artifical neural network. J Urol 2003; 169: 1250-6.
25. Havel D, Saussine C, Fath C, Lang H, Faure F, Jacqmin D. Single stones of the lower pole of the kidney: comparative results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 1998; 33: 396-400.
26. Sumino Y, Mimata H, Tasaki Y, Ohno H, Hoshino T, Nomura T, et al. Predictors of lower pole renal stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 2002; 168: 1344-7.
27. Balatci S, Sarica K, Ozdiler E, Dincel C, Kuppeli S, Gogus O. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in anomalous kidneys. J Endourol 1994; 8: 179-81.
28. Semerci B, Verit A, Nazli Ö, Ilbey Ö, Ozyurt C, Cikilit N. The role of ESWL in the treatment of calculi with anomalous kidneys. Eur Urol 1997; 31: 302-4.
29. Khatin A, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Dogra PN, Seth A, Aron M. Post-ESWL, clinically insignificant residual stones: reality or myth? Urology 2002; 59: 20-4.
30. Candau C, Saussine C, Lang H, Roy C, Faure F, Jacqmin D. Natural history of residual stone fragments after ESWL. Eur Urol 2000; 37: 18-22.
31. Logarakis NF, Jewett MA, Luymes J, Honey RJ. Variation in clinical outcome following shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 2000; 163: 721-5.
32. Paterson RF, Lifshitz DA, Lingeman JE, Evan AP, Connors BA, Fineberg NS, et al. Stone fragmentation during shock wave lithotripsy is improved by slowing the shock wave rate: studies with a new animal model. J Urol 2002; 168: 2211-5.
33. Joseph P, Mandal AK, Singh SK, Mandal P, Sankhwar SN, Sharma SK. Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A preliminary study. J Urol 2002; 167: 1968-71.