Labor with abnormal presentation and position

Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 165-179

  Stitely, Michael L ^a   Gherman, Robert B ^b  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON ADVENTIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; UTERUS SPASMOLYTIC AGENT;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; FORCEPS DELIVERY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR; LABOR COMPLICATION; MALPRESENTATION; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; PALPATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VACUUM EXTRACTION; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 19344375630     PISSN: 08898545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2004.12.005     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. K. Scheer, and J. Nubar Variation of fetal presentation with gestational age Am J Obstet Gynecol 125 2 1976 269 270
2. G.J. Hofmeyr, and R. Kulier External cephalic version for breech presentation at term Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2 2000 CD000083
3. G.J. Hofmeyr Interventions to help external cephalic version for breech presentation at term Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1 2004 CD000184
4. S.J. Schorr, S.E. Speights, and E.L. Ross A randomized trial of epidural anesthesia to improve external cephalic version success Am J Obstet Gynecol 177 5 1997 1133 1137
5. P. Rozenberg, F. Goffinet, and P. Blanie External cephalic version with epidural anaesthesia after failure of a first trial with beta-mimetics Br J Obstet Gynaecol 107 3 2000 406 410
6. L. Dugoff, C.A. Stamm, and O.W. Jones III The effect of spinal anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a randomized trial Obstet Gynecol 93 3 1999 345 349
7. G.J. Hofmeyr, and M.E. Hannah Planned cesarean section for term breech delivery Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3 2003 CD000166
8. M.E. Hannah, W.J. Hannah, and S.A. Hewson Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial Lancet 356 9239 2000 1375 1383
9. J.V. Collea, C. Chein, and E.J. Quilligan The randomized management of term frank breech presentation: a study of 208 cases Am J Obstet Gynecol 137 2 1980 235 244
10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Mode of term singleton breech delivery: committee opinion number 265 2001 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Washington, DC
11. C.R. Macedonia, R.B. Gherman, and A.J. Satin Simulation laboratories for training in obstetrics and gynecology Obstet Gynecol 102 2 2003 388 392
12. D.P. Cruikshank, and C.A. White Obstetric malpresentations: twenty years' experience Am J Obstet Gynecol 116 8 1973 1097 1104
13. J.P. Phelan, M. Boucher, and E. Mueller The nonlaboring transverse lie. A management dilemma J Reprod Med 31 3 1986 184 186
14. M.A. Pelosi, J. Apuzzio, and D. Fricchione The "intra-abdominal version technique" for delivery of transverse lie by low-segment cesarean section Am J Obstet Gynecol 135 8 1979 1009 1011
15. D.P. Cruikshank, and J.E. Cruikshank Face and brow presentations: a review Clin Obstet Gynecol 24 2 1981 333 351
16. P. Duff Diagnosis and management of face presentation Obstet Gynecol 57 1 1982 105 112
17. R.M. Meltzer, M.R. Sachtleben, and E.A. Friedman Brow presentation Am J Obstet Gynecol 100 2 1968 255 262
18. M. Gardberg, E. Laakkonen, and M. Salevaara Intrapartum sonography and persistent occiput posterior position: a study of 408 deliveries Obstet Gynecol 91 5 Pt 1 1998 746 749
19. M.K. Yancey, J. Zhang, and D.L. Schweitzer Epidural analgesia and fetal head malposition at vaginal delivery Obstet Gynecol 96 4 2001 608 612
20. R.D. Phillips, and M. Freeman The management of the persistent occiput posterior position: a review of 552 consecutive cases Obstet Gynecol 43 2 1974 171 177
21. M. Fitzpatrick, K. McQuillan, and C. O'Herlihy Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome Obstet Gynecol 98 6 2001 1027 1031