|
Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 375-376
|
Letter to the Editor (multiple letters)
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CONTRAST MEDIUM;
GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE;
GADOBENIC ACID;
GADOLINIUM;
SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE;
DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;
DRUG DERIVATIVE;
IRON;
MEGLUMINE;
ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;
OXIDE;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS;
DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING;
DRUG UPTAKE;
HEMANGIOMA;
HUMAN;
HUMAN CELL;
HUMAN TISSUE;
IMAGE ANALYSIS;
IMAGING;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
KUPFFER CELL;
LETTER;
LIVER CELL;
LIVER PARENCHYMA;
MAGNET;
MEDICAL LITERATURE;
NODULAR HYPERPLASIA;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PARAMETER;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PUBLICATION;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;
ADULT;
AGED;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
FEMALE;
LIVER;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
NOTE;
PATHOLOGY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
ADULT;
AGED;
CONTRAST MEDIA;
FEMALE;
FOCAL NODULAR HYPERPLASIA;
HUMANS;
IRON;
LIVER;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MALE;
MEGLUMINE;
MIDDLE AGED;
ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS;
OXIDES;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 19344374409
PISSN: 10531807
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20033 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (0)
|