Revisiting the "flexibility hypothesis"

Canadian Public Policy

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 109-116

  Stanford, Jim ^a  

^a Canadian Auto Workers   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC CONDITIONS;

EID: 19344373263     PISSN: 03170861     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3552600     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Auer, P. 2004. "Institutions and Policies for Labour Market Success in Four Small European Countries," in Challenging the Market: The Struggle to Regulate Work and Income, ed. J. Stanford and L.F. Vosko. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
2. Buchele, R. and J. Christiansen. 1999. "Labor Relations and Productivity Growth in Advanced Capitalist Economies," Review of Radical Political Economics 31(1):87-110.
3. Department of Finance Canada. 1994. A New Framework for Economic Policy. Ottawa: Department of Finance Canada.
4. The Globe and Mail. 1994. "Liberating Labour," 16 March, p. A18.
5. Kuhn, P. 1997. "Canada and the 'OECD Hypothesis': Does Labour Market Inflexibility Explain Canada's High Level of Unemployment?" Canadian International Labour Network Working Paper No. 10. Hamilton: McMaster University.
6. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2001. OECD Economic Surveys: Canada. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
7. Riddell, W.C. and A. Sharpe, eds. 1998a. CERF/CSLS Conference on the Canada-U.S. Unemployment Rate Gap, Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques 24(Supplement).
8. Riddell, W.C. and A. Sharpe, eds. 1998b. "The Canada-U.S. Unemployment Rate Gap: An Introduction and Overview," Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques 24(Supplement): S1-S37.
9. Stanford, J. 2000. "Canadian Labour Market Developments in International Context: Flexibility, Regulation and Demand," Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques 26(Supplement):S27-S58.