Alternative reproductive tactics and status-dependent selection

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 566-570

  Lee, Jonathan S F ^a  

^a Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative reproductive tactic; Best of a bad job; Conditional strategy; Cuckoldry; Mixed strategy; Status dependent selection; Switch point; Territoriality

Indexed keywords

REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE STATUS; SELECTION; TERRITORIALITY;

EID: 19344370848     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ari030     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Glynn C, 1986. Pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not mate characteristics. Nature 323:152-153.
2. Brockmann HJ, 2001. The evolution of alternative strategies and tactics. In: Advances in the study of behavior, Vol. 30. (Slater PJB, Rosenblatt JS, Snowdon CT, Roper TJ, eds.) New York: Academic Press 1-151.
3. Crowley PH, 2000. Hawks, doves, and mixed-symmetry games. J Theor Biol 204:543-563.
4. Crowley PH, 2003. Origins of behavioural variability: categorical and discriminative assessment in serial contests. Anim Behav 66:427-440.
5. Dawkins R, 1980. Good strategy or evolutionarily stable strategy? In: Sociobiology: beyond nature/nurture? (Silverberg J, ed). Boulder,-Colarado: Westview Press; 331-367.
6. DeMartini EE, 1991. Spawning success of the male plainfin midshipman. 2. Substratum as a limiting spatial resource. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 146:235-251.
7. Eberhard WG, 1982. Beetle horn dimorphism - making the best of a bad lot. Am Nat 119:420-426.
8. Emlen DJ, 1996. Artificial selection on horn length body size allometry in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Evolution 50:1219-1230.
9. Emlen ST, Oring LW, 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215-223.
10. Flaxman SM, 2000. The evolutionary stability of mixed strategies. Trends Ecol Evol 15:482-484.
11. Foster SA, 1985. Size-dependent territory defense by a damselfish - a determinant of resource use by group-foraging surgeonfishes. Oecologia 67:499-505.
12. Gerhardt HC, Daniel RE, Perrill SA, Schramm S, 1987. Mating-behavior and male mating success in the green treefrog. Anim Behav 35:1490-1503.
13. Gross MR, 1996. Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:92-98.
14. Hammerstein P, Parker GA, 1982. The asymmetric war of attrition. J Theor Biol 96:647-682.
15. Hazel WN, Smock R, Johnson MD, 1990. A polygenic model for the evolution and maintenance of conditional strategies. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 242:181-187.
16. Houston AI, McNamara JM, 1999. Models of adaptive behaviour. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Houtman AM, 1992. Female zebra finches choose extra-pair copulations with genetically attractive males. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 249:3-6.
18. Jennions MD, Petrie M, 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21-64.
19. Kempenaers B, Everding S, Bishop C, Boag P, Robertson RJ, 2001. Extra-pair paternity and the reproductive role of male floaters in the tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:251-259.
20. Kodric-Brown A, 1986. Satellites and sneakers - opportunistic male breeding tactics in pupfish (Cyprinodon-Pecosensis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:425-432.
21. Koseki Y, Maekawa K, 2000. Sexual selection on mature male parr of masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou): does sneaking behavior favor small body size and less-developed sexual characters? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:211-217.
22. Maynard-Smith J, 1982. Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W, 1996. Applied linear statistical models. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
24. Orians GH, 1969. On evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. Am Nat 103:589-603.
25. Parker GA, 1974. Assessment strategy and the evolution of animal conflicts. J Theor Biol 47:223-243.
26. Parker GA, 1982. Phenotype-limited evolutionarily stable strategies. In: Current problems in sociobiology (King's College Sociobiology Group, eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 173-201.
27. Parker GA, Rubenstein DI, 1981. Role assessment, reserve strategy, and acquisition of information in asymmetric animal conflicts. Anim Behav 29:221-240.
28. Repka J, Gross MR, 1995. The evolutionarily stable strategy under individual condition and tactic frequency. J Theor Biol 176:27-31.
29. Rodenhouse NL, Sherry TW, Holmes RT, 1997. Site-dependent regulation of population size: a new synthesis. Ecology 78:2025-2042.
30. Roff DA, 1996. The evolution of threshold traits in animals. Q Rev Biol 71:3-35.
31. Rubenstein DI, 1980. On the evolution of alternative mating strategies. In: The allocation of individual behaviour (Staddon JER, ed).NewYork: Academic Press; 65-100.
32. Sergio F, Newton I, 2003. Occupancy as a measure of territory quality. J Anim Ecol 72:857-865.
33. Shuster SM, Wade MJ, 2003. Mating systems and strategies. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
34. Tomkins JL, 1999. Environmental and genetic determinants of the male forceps length dimorphism in the European earwig Forficula auricularia L. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:1-8.
35. Tomkins JL, Brown GS, 2004. Population density drives the local evolution of a threshold dimorphism. Nature 431:1099-1103.
36. Waltz EC, 1982. Alternative mating tactics and the law of diminishing returns - the satellite threshold model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:75-83.
37. Waltz EC, Wolf LL, 1988. Alternative mating tactics in male white-faced dragonflies (Leucorrhinia-Intacta) - plasticity of tactical options and consequences for reproductive success. Evol Ecol 2:205-231.