|
Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 681-686
|
Masked comparison of silicone hydrogel lotrafilcon A and etafilcon A extended-wear bandage contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTIFICIAL TEAR;
CIPROFLOXACIN;
ETAFILCON A;
FLUOROMETHOLONE;
IBUPROFEN;
LOTRAFILCON A;
OXYCODONE;
PARACETAMOL;
SILICONE GEL;
TETRACAINE;
UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CORNEA EPITHELIUM;
CORRELATION ANALYSIS;
DEVICE REMOVAL;
DRUG DOSE REGIMEN;
EXTENDED WEAR CONTACT LENS;
EYE;
HUMAN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY;
POSTOPERATIVE CARE;
POSTOPERATIVE PAIN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
SURGICAL WARD;
TISSUE PRESERVATION;
UNITED STATES;
UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
BANDAGES;
CONTACT LENSES, EXTENDED-WEAR;
EPITHELIUM, CORNEAL;
HUMANS;
HYDROGELS;
KERATECTOMY, PHOTOREFRACTIVE, EXCIMER LASER;
METHACRYLATES;
PAIN MEASUREMENT;
PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SILICONES;
WOUND HEALING;
|
EID: 19344367620
PISSN: 08863350
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.022 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (56)
|
References (8)
|