Phylloclimate or the climate perceived by individual plant organs: What is it? How to model it? What for?

New Phytologist

Volumn 166, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 781-790

  Chelle, Michaël ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

3D; Canopy; Function structure; Measurement; Microclimate; Modeling; Phylloclimate

Indexed keywords

WATER;

CANOPY; ECOPHYSIOLOGY; MICROCLIMATE;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; LIGHT; METABOLISM; MICROCLIMATE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; REVIEW;

ECOSYSTEM; LIGHT; MICROCLIMATE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT COMPONENTS, AERIAL; WATER;

EID: 19344366255     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01350.x     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Agrios G. 1997. Plant Pathology. San Diego, USA: Harcourt Academic Press.
2. Anzola-Jürgenson GA. 2002. NEXUS: An example for the interconnection of structural and microclimate models. In: Hölker, F, ed. Scales, Hierarchies and Emergent Properties in Ecological Models. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang. 105-117.
3. Baldocchi D, Verma S, Rosenberg N. 1980. Effect of wind on canopy structure, irradiance penetration and source-sink locations. Agronomy Abstracts. 72nd annual meeting, American Society of Agronomy, 9.
4. Baldocchi D, Verma S, Rosenberg N. 1983. Characteristics of air flow above and within soybean canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 25: 43-54.
5. Barradas V, Jones H, Clark J. 1998. Sunfleck dynamics and canopy structure in a Phaseolus vulgaris L. canopy. International Journal of Biometeorology 42: 34-43.
6. Brunet Y. 1997. Architectural modeling and turbulent transfers. In: Andrieu B, ed. Architectural modeling. Paris, France: INRA Bioclimatologie, 231-233.
7. Bussière F, Solmon F, Fouere A. 2002. Implementation and evaluation of DROP, a model for the simulation of rainfall distribution below plants described in 3D. Agronomie 22: 93-103.
8. Butler D, Huband N. 1985. Throughfall and stemflow in wheat. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 35: 329-338.
9. Chartier M, Bouchretien P, Allirand JM, Gosse G. 1989. Amorphous silicon cells for the measurement of photosynthetically active radiation. Agronomie 9: 281-284.
10. Chelle M, Andrieu B. 1998. The nested radiosity model for the distribution of light within plant canopies. Ecological Modelling 111: 75-91.
11. Chelle M, Andrieu B. 1999. Radiative models for architectural modeling. Agronomie 19: 225-240.
12. Chen J, Leblanc S. 1997. A four-scale bidirectional reflectance model based on canopy architecture. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 35: 1316-1337.
13. Crockford R, Richardson D. 2000. Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and interception: effect of forest type, ground cover and climate. Hydrological Processes 14: 2903-2920.
14. Dauzat J, Rapidel B, Berger A. 2001. Simulation of leaf transpiration and sap flow in virtual plants: model description and application to a coffee plantation in Costa Rica. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 109: 143-160.
15. Doaré O, Moulia B, Langre Ed. 2004. Effect of plant interaction on wind-induced plant motion. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 126: 146-151.
16. Drouet JL. 2003. MODICA and MODANCA: modelling the three-dimensional shoot structure of graminaceous crops from two methods of plant description. Field Crops Research 83: 215-222.
17. Espana M, Baret F, Aries F, Andrieu B, Chelle M. 1999. Radiative transfer sensitivity to the accuracy of canopy structure description: the case of maize canopy. Agronomie 19: 241-254.
18. Falster DS, Westoby M. 2003. Leaf size and angle vary widely across species: what consequences for light interception? New Phytologist 158: 509-525.
19. Farquhar GD, Caemmerer SV, Berry JA. 2001. Models of photosynthesis. Plant Physiology 125: 42-45.
20. Gautier H, Mech R, Prusinkiewicz P, Varlet-Grancher C. 2000. 3D architectural modelling of aerial photomorphogenesis in white clover (Trifolium repens L.) using 1-systems. Annals of Botany 85: 359-370.
21. Grantz DA, Vaughn DL. 1999. Vertical profiles of boundary layer conductance and wind speed in a cotton canopy measured with heated brass surrogate leaves. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 97: 187-197.
22. Grimm V, Wyszomirski T, Aikman D, Uchmanski J. 1999. Individual-based modelling and ecological theory: synthesis of a workshop. Ecological Modelling 115: 275-282.
23. Gutschick V, Barron M, Waechter D, Wolf M. 1985. Portable monitor for solar radiation that accumulates irradiance histograms for 32 leaf-mounted sensors. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 33: 281-290.
24. Gutschick V, Bassirirad H. 2003. Extreme events as shaping physiology, ecology, and evolution of plants: toward a unified definition and evaluation of their consequences. New Phytologist 160: 21-42.
25. Helbert J, Boissard P, Buis JP. 2001. A theoretical study of an electrostatic multipole to assess the horizontal and vertical distribution of the in situ water content of vegetation canopies. Agronomie 21: 127-138.
26. Jacobs AFG, van Pul WAJ, van Dijken A. 1990. Similarity of moisture dew profiles within a corn canopy. Journal of Applied Meteorology 29: 1300-1306.
27. Jaffe MJ, Forbes S. 1993. Thigmomorphogenesis: the effect of mechanical perturbation on plants. Plant Growth Regulation 12: 313-324.
28. Jones H. 1992. Plant and Microclimate, a Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univeristy Press.
29. Jones H, Archer N, Rotenberg E, Casa R. 2003. Radiation measurement for plant ecophysiology. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 879-889.
30. Kirschbaum M, Kuppers M, Schneider H, Giersch C, Noe S. 1998. Modelling photosynthesis in fluctuating light with inclusion of stomatal conductance, biochemical activation and pools of key photosynthetic intermediates. Planta 204: 16-26.
31. Knyazikhin Y, Miessen G, Panfyorov O, Gravenhorst G. 1997. Small-scale study of three dimensional distribution of photosynthetically active radiation in a forest. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology 88: 215-239.
32. Lomas J, Schlesinger E, Israeli A. 1971. Leaf temperature measurement techniques. Boundary Layer Meteorology 1: 458-465.
33. Mabrouk H, Sinoquet H. 1998. Indices of light microclimate and canopy structure of grapevines determined by 3D digitising and image analysis, and their relationship to grape quality. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 4: 2-13.
34. Magori K, Oborny B, Dieckmann U, Meszena G. 2003. Cooperation and competition in heterogeneous environments: the evolution of resource sharing in clonal plants. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5: 787-817.
35. Mech R, Prusinkiewicz P. 1996. Visual models of plants interacting with their environment. In: Rushmeier, H, ed. Siggraph'96. New Orleans, USA: Addison-Wesley, 397-410.
36. Miller DP, Howell GS, Flore JA. 1996. A whole-plant, open, gas-exchange system for measuring net photosynthesis of potted woody plants. Hortscience 31: 944-946.
37. Moffett MW. 2001. The nature and limits of canopy biology. Selbyana 22: 155-179.
38. Monteith JL. 1977. Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 281: 277-294.
39. Orians CM, Jones CG. 2001. Plants as resource mosaics: a functional model for predicting patterns of within-plant resource heterogeneity to consumers based on vascular architecture and local environmental variability. Oikos 94: 493-504.
40. Papastamati K, McCartney H, van den Bosch F. 2004. Modelling leaf wetness duration during thee rosette stage of oilseed rape. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology 123: 69-78.
41. Pearcy R, Gross L, He D. 1997. An improved dynamic model of photosynthesis for estimation of carbon gain in sunfleck light regimes. Plant, Cell & Environment 20: 411-424.
42. Pearcy R, Roden J, Gamon J. 1990. Sunfleck dynamics in relation to canopy structure in a soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 52: 359-372.
43. Pearcy R, Valladares F, Wright S, de Paulis E. 2004. A functional analysis of the crown architecture of tropical forest Psychotria species: do species vary in light capture efficiency and consequently in carbon gain and growth? Oecologia 139: 163-177.
44. Perttunen J, Sievanen R, Nikinmaa E. 1998. LIGNUM: a model combining the structure and the functioning of trees. Ecological Modelling 108: 189-198.
45. Pradal C, Dones N, Godin C, Barbier de Reuille P, Boudon F, Adam B, Sinoquet H. 2004. ALEA: A software for integrating analysis and simulation tools for 3D architecture and ecophysiology. In: Godin, C et al., eds. 4th International Workshop on Functional-Structural Plant Models. Montpellier, France: UMR AMAP, 406.
46. Prusinkiewicz P. 1998. Modeling of spatial structure and development of plants: a review. Scientia Horticulturae 74: 113-149.
47. Roden J. 2003. Modeling the light interception and carbon gain of individual fluttering aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx) leaves. Tree: Structure and Function 17: 117-126.
48. Roden J, Pearcy R. 1993a. The effect of flutter on the temperature of poplar leaves and its implications for carbon gain. Plant, Cell & Environment 16: 571-577.
49. Roden J, Pearcy R. 1993b. Effect of leaf flutter on the light environment of poplars. Oecologia 93: 201-207.
50. Ruel J, Ayres M. 1999. Jensen's inequality predicts effects of environmental variation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 361-366.
51. Sache I. 2000. Short-distance dispersal ofwheat rust spores by wind and rain. Agronomie 20: 757-767.
52. Saint-Jean S, Chelle M, Huber L. 2003. Modelling water transfer by rainsplash in a 3D canopy using Monte Carlo integration. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology 121: 183-196.
53. Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E, Nygren P, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Perttunen J, Hakulai H. 2000. Components of functional-structural tree models. Annals of Forest Sciences 57: 399-412.
54. Sinoquet H, LeRoux X. 2000. Short term interactions between tree foliage and the aerial environment: an overview of modelling approaches available for tree structure-function models. Annals of Forest Science 57: 477-496.
55. Sinoquet H, Rivet P. 1997. Measurement and visualization of the architecture of an adult tree based on a three-dimensional digitising device. Trees: Structure and Function 11: 265-270.
56. Sinoquet H, Roux XL, Adam B, Améglio T, Daudet FA. 2001. RATP, a model for simulatong the spatial distribution of radiation absorption, transpiration and photosynthesis within canopies: aaplication to an isolated tree crown. Plant, Cell & Environment 24: 395-406.
57. Soler C, Sillion FX, Blaise F, de Reffye P. 2003. An efficient instantiation algorithm for simulating radiant energy transfer in plant models. Acm Transactions on Graphics 22: 204-233.
58. Tardieu F, Garnier C, Muller B. 1999. Modelling leaf explansion in a fluctuating environment: are changes in specific leaf area a consequence of changes in expansion rate? New Phytologist 143: 33-43.
59. Walter-Shea EA, Norman JM, Blad BL. 1989. Leaf bidirectional reflectance and transmittance in corn and soybean. Remote Sensing of Environment 29: 161-174.
60. Wang S, Yernaux M, Deltour J. 1999. A networked two-dimensional sonic anemometer system for the measurement of air velocity in greenhouses. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 73: 189-197.
61. Watson M. 1986. Integrated physiological units in Plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1: 119-123.
62. Wilson TB, Bland WL, Norman JM. 1999. Measurement and simulation of dew accumulation and drying in a potato canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 93: 111-119.
63. Wilson TB, Norman JM, Bland WL, Kucharik CJ. 2003. Evaluation of the importance of Lagrangian canopy turbulence formulations in a soil-plant-atmosphere model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 115: 51-69.