Interference of the electrospray voltage on chromatographic separations using porous graphitic carbon columns

Journal of Mass Spectrometry

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 216-222

  Törnkvist, Anna ^a   Nilsson, Stefan ^a   Amirkhani, Ardeshir ^a   Nyholm, Lena M ^b   Nyholm, Leif ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b GE Healthcare Bio Sciences AB   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Catecholamine; Dopamine; Electrochemistry; Electrospray; Liquid chromatography; Mass spectrometry; Porous graphitic carbon

Indexed keywords

AMINES; AMMONIUM COMPOUNDS; CARBON; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; GRAPHITE; IONIZATION; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; METABOLITES; METHANOL;

CAPILLARY COLUMNS;

MASS SPECTROMETRY;

3 O METHYLDOPA; AMMONIUM FORMATE; CARBON; DOPAMINE; METHANOL; NORADRENALIN; TYROSINE;

ARTICLE; CAPILLARY CHROMATOGRAPHY; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ELECTROSPRAY MASS SPECTROMETRY; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; TIME;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; DIHYDROXYPHENYLALANINE; DOPAMINE; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; GRAPHITE; NOREPINEPHRINE; SPECTROMETRY, MASS, ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION; TYROSINE;

EID: 19244386631     PISSN: 10765174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jms.589     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Kebarle P, Tang L. From ions in solution to ions in the gas phase - the mechanism of electrospray mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1993; 65: 972A.
2. Blades AT, Ikonomou MG, Kebarle P. Mechanism of electrospray mass spectrometry. Electrospray as an electrolysis cell. Anal. Chem. 1991; 63: 2109.
3. Van Berkel GJ, Zhou F. Electrospray as a controlled-current electrolytic cell: electrochemical ionization of neutral analytes for detection by electrospray mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1995; 67: 3958.
4. Van Berkel GJ, Zhou F, Aronson JT. Changes in bulk solution pH caused by the inherent controlled-current electrolytic process of an electrospray ion source. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1997; 162: 55.
5. Nilsson S, Svedberg M, Pettersson J, Björefors F, Markides K, Nyholm L. Evaluations of the stability of sheathless electrospray ionization mass spectrometry emitters using electrochemical techniques. Anal. Chem. 2001; 73: 4607.
6. Konermann L, Silva EA, Sogbein OF. Electrochemically induced pH changes resulting in protein unfolding in the ion source of an electrospray mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2001; 73: 4836.
7. Liu S, Griffiths WJ, Sjövall J. On-column electrochemical reactions accompanying the electrospray. Anal. Chem. 2003; 75: 1022.
8. Lu W, Cassidy RM. Background noise in capillary electrophoretic amperometric detection. Anal. Chem. 1994; 66: 200.
9. Poole CF, Schuette SA. Contemporary Practise of Chromatography. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1984.
10. Kinoshita K. Carbon, Electrochemical and Physicochemical Properties. Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1988.
11. Törnkvist A, Markides KE, Nyholm L. Chromatographic behaviour of oxidised porous graphitic carbon columns. Analyst 2003;128: 844.
12. Harnisch JA, Porter MD. Electrochemically modulated liquid chromatography: an electrochemical strategy for manipulating chromatographic retention. Analyst 2001; 126: 1841.
13. Arora A, Eijkel JCT, Morf WE, Manz A. A Wireless electrochemiluminescence detector applied to direct and indirect detection for electrophoresis on a microfabricated glass device. Anal. Chem. 2001; 73: 3282.
14. Deng H, Van Berkel GJ, Takano H, Gazda D, Porter MD. Electrochemically modulated liquid chromatography coupled on-line with electrospray mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2000; 72: 2641.