Detection of lymph-node metastases in patients with gastric carcinoma: Comparison of three MR imaging pulse sequences

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 25-29

  Kato, M ^a   Saji, S ^a   Kanematsu, M ^a   Fukada, D ^a   Miya, K ^a   Umemoto, T ^a   Kunieda, K ^a   Sugiyama, Y ^a   Takao, H ^a   Kawaguchi, Y ^a   Takagi, Y ^a   Kondo, H ^a   Hoshi, H ^a  

^a GIFU UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Gastric carcinoma; Lymph node; Magnetic resonance; Pulse sequence; Receiver characteristic curve analysis

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREATH HOLDING; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; GASTRECTOMY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STOMACH CARCINOMA;

ABDOMEN; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA; FEMALE; GASTRECTOMY; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; STOMACH NEOPLASMS;

EID: 19244385047     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002619910004     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Misika S, Chastang C, Houry S, et al. Lymph node involvement as the only prognostic factor in curative resected gastric cancer carcinoma. A multivariate analysis. World J Surg 1989;13:118-123
2. Dehn TCB, Rezenk RH, Nockler Ib, et al. The preoperative assessment of advanced gastric cancer by computed tomography. Br J Surg 1984;71:413-417
3. Triller J, Roder R, Stafford A, et al. CT in advanced gastric-carcinoma: is exploratory laparotomy avoidable? Eur J Radiol 1986;6:181-186
4. Sussman SK, Halvorsen RA Jr, Illescas FF, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma: CT versus surgical staging. Radiology 1988;167:335-340
5. Botet JF, Lightdale CJ, Zauber AG, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT. Radiology 1991;18:342-343
6. Ziegler K, Sanft C, Zeitz M, et al. Comparison of computed tomography, endosonography, and intraoperative assessment in TN staging of gastric carcinoma. Gut 1993;34:604-610
7. Cho JS, Kim JK, Rho SM, et al. Preoperative assessment of gastric carcinoma: value of two-phase dynamic CT with mechanical i.v. injection of contrast material. AJR 1994;163:69-75
8. Fukaya T, Honda H, Hayashi T, et al. Lymph-node melastases: efficacy of detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer. Radiology 1995;197:705-711
9. Davies J, Chalmers AG, Sue-Ling HM, et al. Spiral computed tomography and operative staging of gastric carcinoma: a comparison with histopathological staging. Gut 1997;41:314-319
10. Stomach. In: Sobin LH, Wittkind C, eds. TNM classification of malignant, 5th ed. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1997:59-62
11. Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986;21:720-723
12. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1992;143: 29-36
13. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. Lymph nodes. In: Nishi M, Omori Y, Miwa K, eds. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 1st English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co., Ltd., 1995: 6-11
14. Dorfman RE, Alpern MB, Gross BH, et al. Upper abdominal lymph nodes: criteria for normal size determined with CT. Radiology 1991;180:319-322