An ex vivo investigation to compare orthodontic bonding using a 4-META-based adhesive or a composite adhesive to acid-etched and sandblasted enamel

Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 51-58

  Clark, S A ^a   Gordon, P H ^a   McCabe, J F ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

4 META; Acid etching; Acrylic; Orthodontic bonding; Sandblasting

Indexed keywords

4 META RESIN; 4-META RESIN; ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ADHESIVE AGENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; RIGHT-ON; TOOTH CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RIGHT ON; SHEAR STRENGTH;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ACRYLIC RESINS; ADHESIVES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ENAMEL MICROABRASION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH;

EID: 19244378192     PISSN: 14653125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ortho/30.1.51     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pre-treatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-340.
2. Fraunhofer JA, Allen DJ, Orbell GM. Laser etching of enamel for direct bonding. Angle Orthod 1993;63:73-76.
3. Sargison AE, McCabe JF, Millett DT. A laboratory investigation to compare enamel preparation by sand blasting and acid etching prior to bracket bonding. Br J Orthod 1999;26:141-146.
4. Norevall LI, Marcusson A, Persson M. A clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding adhesive compared with an acrylic resin. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:373-384. (Pubitemid 126421976)
5. Fricker JP. A 12 month clinical evaluation of a light activated glass ionomer cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:502-505.
6. Moin K, Dogon IL. An evaluation of shear strength, measurements of unfilled and filled combinations. Am J Orthod 1978;74:531-535.
7. Kusai Al-Munajed M, Gordon PH, McCabe JF. The use of a cyanoacrylate adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets: an ex vivo study. J Orthod 2000;27:255-260.
8. Ireland AJ, Sherriff M. Use of an adhesive resin for bonding orthodontic brackets. Eur J Orthod 1994;16:27-34.
9. Cook PA, Youngson CC. An in vitro study of the bond strength of glass ionomer cement in the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Br J Orthod 1988;15:247-253.
10. Pus MD, Way DC. Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean-up techniques. Am J Orthod 1980;80:269-283. (Pubitemid 10067436)
11. Zachrisson BU, Büyükyyilmaz T. Recent advances in bonding to gold, amalgam and porcelain. J Clin Orthod 1993;27:661-675.
12. Millet DT, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. The role of sandblasting on the retention of metallic brackets applied with glass ionomer cement. Br J Orthod 1993;20:117-122.
13. Wood DP, Paleczny GJ, Johnson LN. The effect of sandblasting on the retention of orthodontic bands. Angle Orthod 1996:66:207-214. (Pubitemid 126466212)
14. Hobson RS, McCabe JF, Hogg SD. Bond strength to surface enamel for different tooth types. Dent Mat 2001;17:184-189. (Pubitemid 33651195)
15. O'Brien KD, Watts DC, Read MJF. Residual debris and bond strength-is there a relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;94:222-230.
16. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171-178.
17. Olsen ME, Bishara SE, Damon P, Jakobsen JR. Comparison of shear bond strength and surface structure between conventional acid etching and air abrasion of human enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997;112:502-506.
18. Canay Ş, Kocadereli I, Akça E. The effect of enamel air abrasion on the retention of bonded metallic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2000;117:15-19.
19. Reisner KR, Levitt HL, Mante F. Enamel preparation for orthodontic bonding: a comparison between the use of a sandblaster and current techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997;111:366-373.
20. Waveren Hogervorst WL, Feilzer AL, Prahl-Andersen B. The air-abrasion technique versus the conventional acid-etching technique: a quantification of the surface enamel loss and comparison of shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2000;117:20-26.
21. Mattick CR, Hobson RS. A comparative microtopographical study of the buccal enamel of different tooth types. J Orthod 2000;27:143-148.
22. Hotta K, Mogi M, Mura F, Nakabayashi N. Effect of 4-MET on bond strength and penetration of monomers into enamel. Dent Mat 1992;8:173-175.
23. Nakabayashi N. Biocompatibility and promotion of adhesion to tooth substrates. CRC Critic Rev Biocompat 1984;1:25-52.