Mimicking time evolution within a quantum ground state: Ground-state quantum computation, cloning, and teleportation

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2004, Pages

  Mizel, Ari ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ENERGY GAP; GROUND STATE; HAMILTONIANS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; NETWORKS (CIRCUITS); PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PROBABILITY; SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

QUANTUM COMPUTERS; TELEPORTATION; TIME EVOLUTION; TIME INDEPENDENT STATES;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 19244366024     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.012304     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
2. P. W. Shor, in Proceedings of the 35th Symposium on Foundations of Computing (IEEE Computer Society, New York, 1994), p. 124.
3. A. Ekert and R. Jozsa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1 (1996).
4. L. K. Grover, in Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computation (ACM, New York, 1996), p. 212.
5. L. K. Grover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 325 (1997).
6. D. Deutsch, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 400, 97 (1985).
7. R. Jozsa, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 435, 563 (1991).
8. J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995).
9. C. Monroe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4714 (1995).
10. Q. A. Turchette, C. J. Hood, W. Lange, H. Mabuchi, and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4710 (1995).
11. N. Gershenfeld and I. L. Chuang, Science 275, 350 (1997).
12. I. L. Chuang, N. Gershenfeld, and M. Kubinec, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3408 (1998).
13. D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998).
14. G. Burkard, D. Loss, and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. B 59, 2070 (1999).
15. A. Shnirman, G. Schon, and Z. Hermon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2371 (1997).
16. Y. Makhlin, G. Schon, and A. Shnirman, Nature (London) 398, 305 (1999).
17. D. V. Averin, Solid State Commun. 105, 659 (1998).
18. Y. Nakamura, Yu. A. Pashkin, and J. S. Tsai, Nature (London) 398, 786 (1999).
19. J. E. Mooij et al., Science 285, 1036 (1999).
20. L. B. Ioffe, V. B. Geshkenbein, M. V. Feigel'man, A. L. Fauchere, and G. Blatter, Nature (London) 398, 679 (1999).
21. D. Vion, A. Aassime, A. Cottet, P. Joyez, H. Pothier, C. Urbina, D. Esteve, and M. H. Devoret, Science 296, 886 (2002).
22. Y. A. Pashkin, T. Yamamoto, O. Astafiev, Y. Nakamura, D. V. Averin, and J. S. Tsai, Nature (London) 421, 823 (2003).
23. B. Kane, Nature (London) 393, 133 (1998).
24. A. Mizel, M. W. Mitchell, and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. A 63, 040302(R) (2001).
25. A. Mizel, M. W. Mitchell, and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. A 65, 022315 (2002).
26. A. Barenco et al., Phys. Rev. A 52, 3457 (1995).
27. W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, Nature (London) 299, 802 (1982).
28. R. P. Feynman, Optics News 11(2), 11 (1985).
29. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. A 32, 3266 (1985).
30. C. H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
31. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 321 (1997).
32. D. Gottesman and I. L. Chuang, Nature (London) 402, 390 (1999).
33. G. Vidal, L. Masanes, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 047905 (2002).
34. Since our controlled-NOT gate (7) ensures that the target bit is always at a lower row than the control bit, the probabilities are actually greater than our estimates.
35. This idea is due to M. W. Mitchell, who refers to it as the "squeegee" approach because of the way that potential pushes the ground state down the quantum dot array.