A dual-task tool for quantifying normal comprehension of aphasic connected speech production: A constructive replication

Aphasiology

Volumn 19, Issue 3-5, 2005, Pages 473-484

  McNeil, Malcolm R ^a,b,c   Matthews, Christine T ^a,b   Hula, William D ^a,b   Doyle, Patrick J ^a,b   Rubinsky, Hilel J ^a   Fossett, Tepanta R D ^a,b  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; APHASIA; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; DICHOTIC LISTENING; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; RECALL; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH THERAPY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 19144372719     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02687030444000895     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Arvedson, J. C., & McNeil, M. R. (1987). Accuracy and response times for semantic judgements and lexical decisions with left and right hemisphere lesions. Clinical Aphasiology, 17, 188-200.
2. Backs, R. W. (1997). Psychophysiological aspects of selective and divided attention during continuous manual tracking. Acta Psychologica, 96, 167-191.
3. Bayles, K. A., Boone, D. R., Tomoeda, C. K., Slauson, T. J., & Kaszniak, A. W. (1989). Differentiating Alzheimer's patients from the normal elderly and stroke patients with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 74-87.
4. Bayles, K. A., & Tomoeda, C. K. (1993). Arizona Battery for Communication Disorders of Dementia. Tuscon, AZ: Canyonlands.
5. Campbell, T. F., & McNeil, M. R. (1985). Effects of presentation rate and divided attention on auditory comprehension in children with acquired language disorder. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 513-520.
6. Clark, H. M., & Robin, D. A. (1995). Sense of effort during a lexical decision task: Resource allocation deficits following brain damage. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 143-147.
7. DiSimoni, F. G., Keith, R. L., & Darley, F. L. (1980). Prediction of PICA overall score by short versions of the test. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 511-516.
8. Duffy, J. R., & Keith, R. C. (1980). Contemporary studies: Performance of non-brain injured adults on the PICA: Descriptive data and a comparison to patients with aphasia. Aphasia-Apraxia-Agnosia, 2, 1-30,
9. Erickson, R. J., Goldinger, S. D., & LaPointe, L. L. (1996). Auditory vigilance in aphasic individuals: Detecting nonlinguistic stimuli with full or divided attention. Brain and Cognition, 30, 244-253.
10. Gopher, D., Brickner, M., & Navon, D. (1982). Different difficulty manipulations interact differently with task emphasis: Evidence for multiple resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 146-157.
11. Granier, J. P., Robin, D. A., Shapiro, L. P., Peach, R. K., & Zimba, L. D. (2000). Measuring processing load during sentence comprehension: Visuomotor tracking. Aphasiology, 14, 501-513.
12. Hirst, W., & Kalmar, D. (1987). Characterizing attentional resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 116, 68-81.
13. Isreal, J. B., Chesney, G. L., Wickens, C. D., & Donchin, E. (1980). P300 and tracking difficulty: Evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. Psychophysiology, 17, 259-273.
14. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. McLeod, P. (1977). A dual task response modality effect: Support for multiprocessor models of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 651-667.
16. McNeil, M. R. (1978). Prediction and pattern of recovery from aphasia with arteriovenous malformation. Clinical Aphasiology, 2, 71-85.
17. McNeil, M. R. (1982). The nature of aphasia in adults. In N. J. Lass, L. V. McReynolds, J. Northern, & D. E. Yoder (Eds.), Speech, language, and hearing: Vol. II (pp. 692-740). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
18. McNeil, M. R. (1988). Aphasia in the adult. In N. J. Lass, L. V. McReynolds, J. Northern, & D. E. Yoder (Eds.), Handbook of speech-language pathology and audiology (pp. 738-786). Toronto: B. C. Decker.
19. McNeil, M. R., Doyle, P. J., Fossett, T. R. D., Park, G. H., & Goda, A. J. (2001). Reliability and concurrent validity of the information unit scoring metric for the story retelling procedure. Aphasiology, 15, 991-1006.
20. McNeil, M. R., Doyle, P. J., Hula, W. D., Rubinsky, H. J., Fossett, T. R. D., & Matthews, C. T. (2004). Using resource allocation theory and dual-task methods to increase the sensitivity of assessment in aphasia. Aphasiology, 18, 521-542.
21. McNeil, M. R., Doyle, P. J., Park, G., Fossett, T. R. D., & Brodsky, M. B. (2002). Increasing the sensitivity of the story retell procedure for the discrimination of normal elderly subjects from persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, 16, 815-822.
22. McNeil, M. R., Odell, K., & Tseng, C. H. (1991). Toward the integration of resource allocation into a general theory of aphasia. Clinical Aphasiology, 21, 21-39.
23. Murray, L. L. (1999). Attention and aphasia: Theory, research and clinical implications. Aphasiology, 13, 91-111.
24. Murray, L. L. (2000). The effects of varying attentional demands on the word retrieval skills of adults with aphasia, right hemisphere brain damage, or no brain damage. Brain and Language, 72, 40-72.
25. Murray, L. L., Holland, A. L., & Beeson, P. M. (1997a). Auditory processing in individuals with mild aphasia: A study of resource allocation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 792-809.
26. Murray, L. L., Holland, A. L., & Beeson, P. M. (1997b). Accuracy monitoring and task demand evaluation in aphasia. Aphasiology, 11, 401-414.
27. Murray, L. L., Holland, A. L., & Beeson, P. M. (1998). Spoken language of individuals with mild fluent aphasia under focused and divided-attention conditions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 213-227.
28. Navon, D. (1984). Resources: A theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216-234.
29. Navon, D. (1990). Exploring two methods for estimating performance tradeoff. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 155-157.
30. Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214-255.
31. Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1980). Task difficulty, resources, and dual-task performance. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance (pp. 297-315). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
32. Payne, D. G., Peters, L. J., Birkmire, D. P., Bonto, M. A., Anastasi, J. S., & Wenger, M. J. (1994). Effects of speech intelligibility level on concurrent visual task performance. Human Factors, 36, 441-475.
33. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444-474.
34. Schmidt, R. A., & Gordan, G. B. (1977). Errors in motor responding, "rapid" corrections, and false anticipations. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 101-111.
35. Schubert, T., & Szameitat, A. J. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of interference in overlapping dual tasks: An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 733-746.
36. Slansky, B. L., & McNeil, M. R. (1997). Resource allocation in auditory processing of emphatically stressed stimuli in aphasia. Aphasiology, 11, 461-472.
37. Szameitat, A. J., Schubert, T., Muller, K., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). Localization of executive functions in dual-task performance with fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1184-1199.
38. Tseng, C. H., McNeil, M. R., & Milenkovic, P. (1993). An investigation of attention allocation deficits in aphasia. Brain and Language, 45, 276-296.
39. Wickens, C. D. (1976). The effects of divided attention on information processing in manual tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 1-13.
40. Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention. New York: Academic Press.
41. Wickens, C. D. (1986). The effects of control dynamics on performance. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 1-60). New York: Wiley & Sons.
42. Wickens, C. D., Kramer, A., Vanasse, L., & Donchin, E. (1983). Performance of concurrent tasks: A psychological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. Science, 221, 1080-1082.