Distribution and feeding of juvenile fish on invertebrates in littoral reed (Phragmites) stands

Ecology of Freshwater Fish

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 139-149

  Okun, Nils ^a,b   Mehner, T ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY AND INLAND FISHERIES   (Germany)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO NORTE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Benthos; Littoral interactions; Perch; Phragmites; Roach; Shallow lake; Zooplankton

Indexed keywords

BENTHOS; FISH; LITTORAL ENVIRONMENT; NICHE PARTITIONING; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; REEDBED; REFUGE; ZOOPLANKTON;

AVES; INVERTEBRATA; PHRAGMITES;

EID: 19144365794     PISSN: 09066691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2005.00087.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bean, C.W. & Winfield, I.J. 1995. Habitat use and activity patterns of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)), rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L.)), perch (Perca fluviatilis (L.)) and pike (Exos lucius (L.)) in the laboratory: the role of predation threat and structural complexity. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 4: 37-46.
2. Bohl, E. 1980. Diel pattern of pelagic distribution and feeding of planktivorous fish. Oecologia 44: 368-375.
3. Brabrand, A. & Faafeng, B. 1993. Habitat shift in roach (Rutilus rutilus) induced by pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) introduction: predation risk versus pelagic behaviour. Oecologia 95: 38-46.
4. Brock, R.E. 1979. An experimental study on the effects of grazing by parrotfishes and role of refuges in benthic community structure. Marine Biology 51: 381-388.
5. Burks, R.L., Jeppesen. E. & Lodge, D.M. 2001. Littoral zone structures as Daphnia refugia against fish predators. Limnology and Oceanography 46: 230-237.
6. Christensen, B. & Persson, L. 1993. Species-specific antipredatory behaviours: effects on prey choice in different habitats. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 32: 1-9.
7. Copp, G.H. & Jurajda, P. 1993. Do small riverine fish move inshore at night? Journal of Fish Biology 43: 229-241.
8. Craig, J.F. 1977. Seasonal changes in the day and night activity of adult perch, Perca fluviatilis L. Journal of Fish Biology 11: 161-166.
9. Crowder, L.B. & Cooper, W.E. 1982. Habitat structural complexity and interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology 63: 1802-1813.
10. Cuinat, R. 1967. Contribution to the study of physical parameters in electrofishing in rivers with direct current. In: Vibert, R., ed. Fishing with electricity, its application to biology and management. England: FAO, Fishing News Ltd Surry, pp. 131-173.
11. Diehl, S. 1988. Foraging efficiency of three freshwater fishes: effects of structural complexity and light. Oikos 53: 207-214.
12. Diehl, S. 1992. Fish predation and benthic community structure: the role of omnivory and habitat complexity. Ecology 73: 1646-1661.
13. Diehl, S. 1993. Effects of habitat structure on resource availability, diet and growth of benthivorous perch, Perca fluviatilis. Oikos 67: 403-414.
14. Dvorac, J. & Best, E.P.H. 1982. Macroinvertebrate communities associated with the macrophytes of Lake Vechten the Netherlands structural and functional relationships. Hydrobiologia 95: 115-126.
15. Eklöv, P. & Diehl, S. 1994. Piscivore efficiency and refuging prey: the importance of predator search mode. Oecologia 98: 344-353.
16. George, E.L. & Hadley, W.F. 1979. Food and habitat partitioning between rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris) and smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui) young of the year. Transaction of the American Fisheries Society 108: 253-261.
17. Gilinsky, E. 1984. The role of fish predation and spatial heterogeneity in determining benthic community structure. Ecology 65: 455-468.
18. Gliwicz, Z.M. & Jachner, A. 1992. Diel migrations of juvenile fish: a ghost of predation past or present? Archiv für Hydrobiologie 124: 385-410.
19. Hargeby, A., Andersson, G., Blindow, I. & Johansson, S. 1994. Trophic web structure in a shallow eutrophic lake during a dominance shift from phytoplankton to submerged macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 280: 83-90.
20. Hasler, A.D. & Villemonte, J.R. 1953. Observations on the daily movements of fishes. Science 118: 321.
21. Hölker, F. & Breckling, B. 2001. An individual-based approach to depict the influence of the feeding strategy on the population structure of roach (Rutilus rutilus L.). Limnologica 31: 69-78.
22. Jacobsen, L. & Berg, S. 1998. Diel variation in habitat use by planktivores in field enclosure experiments: the effect of submerged macrophytes and predation. Journal of Fish Biology 53: 1207-1219.
23. Jacobsen, L. & Perrow, M. 1998. Predation risk from piscivorous fish influencing the diel use macrophytes by planktivorous fish in experimental ponds. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 7: 78-86.
24. Jeppesen, E., Lauridsen, T., Kairesalo, T. & Perrow, M.R. 1998. Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish-zooplankton interactions in lakes. In: Jeppesen, E., Søndergaard, M., Søndergaard, M. & Christoffersen, K., eds. The structuring role of submerged macrophytes in lakes. New York: Springer, pp. 91-114.
25. Johansson, L. 1987. Experimental evidence for interactive habitat segregation between roach (Rutilus rutilus) and rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus) in a shallow eutrophic lake. Oecologia 73: 21-27.
26. Köhler, J., Behrendt, H. & Hoeg, S. 2000. Long-term response of phytoplankton to reduced nutrient load in the flushed Lake Müggelsee (Spree System, Germany). Arch. Hydrobiol. 148: 209-229.
27. Lamarque, P. 1990. Electrophysiology of fish in electric fields. In: Cowx, I.G. & Lamarque, P., eds. Fishing with electricity - applications in freshwater fisheries management. Oxford, UK: Fishing New Books, Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 4-33.
28. Lauridsen, T.L. & Buenk, I. 1996. Die changes in the horizontal distribution of zooplankton in the littoral zone of two shallow eutrophic lakes. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 137: 161-176.
29. Lauridsen, T.L. & Lodge, D. 1996. Avoidance by Daphnia magna fish and macrophytes: chemical cues and predator-mediated use of macrophyte habitat. Limnology and Oceanography 41: 794-798.
30. Lauridsen, T.L., Pedersen, L.J., Jeppesen, E. & Søndergaard, M. 1996. The importance of macrophyte bed size for cladoceran composition and horizontal migration in a shallow lake. Journal of Plankton Research 18: 2282-2294.
31. Manatunge, J., Asaeda, T. & Priyadarshana, T. 2000. The influence of structural complexity on fish-zooplankton interactions: a study using artificial submerged macrophytes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 58: 425-438.
32. Mehner, T., Schultz, H. & Herbst, R. 1995. Interaction of zooplankton dynamics and diet of 0+ perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) in the top-down manipulated Bautzen Reservoir (Saxony, Germany) during summer. Limnologica 25: 1-9.
33. Milinski, M. & Heller, R. 1978. Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Nature 275: 642-644.
34. Naud, M. & Magnan, P. 1988. Diel onshore-offshore migrations in northern redbelly dace Phosinus eos (Cope), in relation to prey distribution in a small oligotrophic lake. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 1249-1253.
35. Nurminen, L.K.L. & Horppila, J.A. 2002. A diurnal study on the distribution of filter feeding zooplankton: effect of emergent macrophytes, pH and lake trophy. Aquatic Sciences 64: 198-206.
36. Persson, L. 1982. Rate of food evacuation in roach (Rutilus rutilus) in relation to temperature, and the application of evacuation rate estimates for studies on the rate of food consumption. Freshwater Biology 12: 203-210.
37. Persson, L. 1987. Effects of habitat and season on competitive interactions between roach (Rutilus rutilus) and perch (Perca fluviatilis). Oecologia 73: 170-177.
38. Persson, L. 1993. Predator-mediated competition in prey refuges: the importance of habitat dependent prey resources. Oikos 68: 12-22.
39. Persson, L. & Eklöv, P. 1995. Prey refuges affecting interactions between piscivorous perch and juvenile perch and roach. Ecology 76: 70-81.
40. Persson, L. & Greenberg, L.A. 1990. Juvenile competitive bottlenecks: the perch (Perca fluviatilis) - roach (Rutilus rutilus) interaction. Ecology 71: 44-56.
41. Svino, J.F. & Stein, R.A. 1982. Predator-prey interaction between largemouth bass and bluegills as influenced by simulated, submersed vegetation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 111: 255-266.
42. Savino, J.F. & Stein, R.A. 1989. Behaviour of fish predators and their prey: habitat choice between open water and dense vegetation. Environmental Biology of Fishes 24: 287-293.
43. Schlosser, I.J. 1988. Predation risk and habitat selection by two size classes of stream cyprinid: experimental test of a hypothesis. Oikos 52: 36-40.
44. Schriver, P., Bogestrand, J., Jeppesen, E. & Søndergaard, M. 1995. Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish-zooplankton-phytoplankton interactions: large scale enclosure experiments in a shallow eutrophic lake. Freshwater Biology 33: 255-270.
45. Sorygin, A.A. 1946. General methods for investigation of fish competition (in Russian). Zoological zurnal Moskva 25: 45-49.
46. Stansfield, J.H., Perrow, M.R., Tensch, L.D., Jowitt, A.J.D. & Taylor, A.A.L. 1997. Submerged macrophytes as refuges for grazing Cladocera against fish predation: observations on seasonal changes in relation to macrophyte cover and predation pressure. Hydrobiologia 342/343: 229-240.
47. Timms, R.M. & Moss, B. 1984. Prevention of growth of potentially dense phytoplankton populations by zooplankton grazing in the presence of zooplanktivorous fish, in a shallow wetland ecosystem. Limnology and Oceanography 29: 472-486.
48. Werner, E.E., Gilliam, J.F., Hall, D.J. & Mittelbach, G.G. 1983. An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64: 1540-1548.
49. Winfield, I.J. 1986. The influence of simulated aquatic macrophytes on the zooplankton consumption rate of juvenile roach, Rutilus rutilus, rudd, Scardinius erythrophthalmus, and perch, Perca fluviatilis. Journal of Fish Biology 29: 37-48.