"Tannenbaum" Teflon stents versus traditional polyethylene stents for treatment of malignant biliary stricture

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 354-358

  Catalano, Marc F ^a,b   Geenen, Joseph E ^a   Lehman, Glen A ^a   Siegel, Jerome H ^a   Jacob, Leslie ^a   McKinley, Matthew J ^a   Raijman, Isaac ^a   Meier, Peter ^a   Jacobson, Ira ^a   Kozarek, Richard ^a   Al Kawas, Firas H ^a   Lo, Simon K ^a   Dua, Kulwinder S ^a   Baille, John ^a   Ginsberg, Gregory G ^a   Parsons, William ^a   Meyerson, Scott M ^a   Cohen, Seth ^a   Nelson, Douglas B ^a   McHattie, James D ^a   Carr Locke, David L ^a   more..

^a GI Consultants Ltd ^*

^b GI Consultants   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLITEF; POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; ENDOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STENT; COMMON BILE DUCT DISEASE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PANCREAS TUMOR; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STENOSIS, OCCLUSION AND OBSTRUCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMMON BILE DUCT DISEASES; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; POLYETHYLENE; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 19044364871     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.121879     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Sherman S, Lehman G, Earle D, Lazaridis E, Frakes J, Johnson J, et al. Endoscopic palliation of malignant bile duct obstruction due to pancreatic cancer. Improvement in quality of life [abstract]. Gastroenterology 1996;110:A39.
2. Speer AG, Cotton PB. Endoscopic stents for biliary obstruction due to malignancy. In: Jacobson JM, editor. ERCP: diagnostic and therapeutic applications. New York: Elsevier; 1989. p. 203-24.
3. Carr-Locke DL, Ball TJ, Connors PJ, Cotton PB, Geenen JE, Hawes RH, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of Wallstent biliary endoprosthesis versus plastic stents [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 1993;39:310.
4. Coene LO, Groen AK, Cheng J, Out MJ, Tytgat NJ, Huibregtse K. Clogging of biliary endoprostheses: a new perspective. Gut 1990;31:913-7.
5. Rey JF, Maupetit P, Grett M. Experimental study of biliary endoprosthesis efficiency. Endoscopy 1985;17:145-8.
6. Binmoeller KF, Seitz U, Seifert H, Thonke F, Sikka S, Soehendra N. The Tannenbaum stent: a new plastic biliary stent without side holes. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:1764-8.
7. Speer AG, Cotton PB, MacRae KD. Endoscopic management of malignant biliary obstruction: stents of 10 French gauge are preferable to stents of 8 French gauge. Gastrointest Endosc 1988;34:412-7.
8. Dowsett JF, William SJ, Hatfield ARW, Houghton J, Lennon T, Russell RCG. Does stent diameter matter in the endoscopic palliation of malignant obstruction? A randomized trial of 10 FG versus 12 PG endoprosthesis [abstract]. Gastroenterology 1989;96:A128.
9. Ikenberry SO, Sherman S, Hawes RH, Smith MT, Lehman GA. The occlusion rate of pancreatic stents. Gastrointest Endosc 1994;40:611-3.
10. Terrazzi V, Comin U, Toti E, Zambelli A, Minoli G. Prospective randomized trial of "Tannenbaum" Teflon versus traditional polyethylene stents in malignant biliary stenosis. An interim analysis [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45:AB151.
11. Van Berkel AM, Boland C, Redkopk, Tytat GNJ, Huibregtse K. Early results of a prospective randomized study of Teflon stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45:AB152.
12. Benz C, Martin WR, Arnold JC, Schilling D, Reimann JF. Malignant distal bile duct obstruction: a prospective randomized trial with three types of endoprostheses [abstract]. Gastroenterology 1998;114:A515.
13. Leung JWL, Ling TKW, Kung JLS, Vallance-Owen J. The role of bacteria in the blockage of biliary stents. Gastrointest Endosc 1988;34:19-22.
14. Speer AG, Cotton PB, Rode J, Seddon AM, Neal CR, Holton J, et al. Biliary stent blockage with bacterial biofilm. A light and electron microscopy study. Ann Int Med 1988;108:546-53.
15. Dowsett JF, Williams SJ, Hatfield ARW, Houghton J, Lennon T, Russell RCG. Does stent diameter matter in the endoscopic palliation of malignant obstruction? A randomized trial of 10 Fr versus 12 Fr endoprosthesis [abstract]. Gastroenterology 1989;96:A128.
16. Barrioz T, Ingrand P, Besson I, de Ledinghen V, Silvain C, Beauchant M. Randomized trial of prevention of biliary sent occlusion by ursodeoxycholic acid plus norfloxacin. Lancet 1994;344:581-2.
17. Browne S, Schmalz M, Geenen J, Venu R, Johnson GK. A comparison of biliary and pancreatic stent occlusion in antibiotic-coated vs. conventional stents [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 1990;36:206.
18. Ghosh S, Palmer KR. Prophylaxis of biliary stent blockage using cyclical-antibiotics and ursodeoxycholic acid [abstract]. Gastroenterology 1993;104:A361.
19. Geoghegan JG, Branch MS, Costerton JW, Pappas TN, Cotton PB. Biliary stents occlude earlier if distal tip is in the duodenum in dogs [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:257.
20. Conn M, Speer AG, Cotton PB. Factors affecting the duration of biliary stent patency in patients with pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 1989;35:162-6.