Effect of repeated assisted reproduction techniques on the ovarian response

Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 233-236

  Serna, José ^a   García Velasco, Juan Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

In vitro fertilization; Ovarian reserve; Repeated controlled ovarian stimulation

Indexed keywords

FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GONADOTROPIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; OOCYTE DONATION; OVARY FOLLICLE ATRESIA; OVARY FUNCTION; OVARY HYPERSTIMULATION; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 18944405332     PISSN: 1040872X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.gco.0000169098.90966.50     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Kelly SM, Buckett WM, Tan SL. Effect of repeated assisted reproductive technology on ovarian response. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003; 15:219-224.
2. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Reimportation of a human embryo with subsequent tubal pregnancy. Lancet 1976; 1:880-882.
3. Nyboe AA, Gianaroli L, Nygren KG. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2000: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2004; 19:490-503.
4. Gougeon A. Ovarian follicular growth in humans: ovarian ageing and population of growing follicles. Maturitas 1998; 30:137-142.
5. te Velde ER, Scheffer GJ, Dorland M, et al. Developmental and endocrine aspects of normal ovarian aging. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1998; 145:67-73.
6. Zeleznik AJ. The physiology of follicle selection. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2004; 2:31-37.
7. Schipper I, Hop WC, Fauser BC. The follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) threshold/window concept examined by different interventions with exogenous FSH during the follicular phase of the normal menstrual cycle: duration, rather than magnitude, of FSH increase affects follicle development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83:1292-1298.
8. Isikoglu M, Ozgur K. Rapid decline in ovarian reserve after repeated ART cycles in a 22-year-old IVF patient. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2003; 268:206-208.
9. Diamond MP, DeCherney AH, Baretto P, Lunenfeld B. Multiple consecutive cycles of ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotropins. Gynecol Endocrinol 1989; 3:237-240.
10. Ron-El R, Raziel A, Herman A, et al. Ovarian response in repetitive cycles induced by menotrophin alone or combined with gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue. Hum Reprod 1990; 5:427-430.
11. Ahmed Ebbiary NA, Morgan C, Martin K, et al. Ovarian response in consecutive cycles of ovarian stimulation in normally ovulating women. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:536-543.
12. Jacobs SL, Metzger DA, Dodson WC, Haney AF. Effect of age on response to human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990; 71:1525-1530.
13. Hoveyda F, Engmann L, Steele J, et al. Ovarian response in three consecutive in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2002; 77:706-710.
14. Kolibianakis E, Osmanagaoglu K, Camus M, et al. Effect of repeated assisted reproductive technology cycles on ovarian response. Fertil Steril 2002; 77:967-970.
15. de Boer EJ, Den TI, Burger CW, et al. The number of retrieved oocytes does not decrease during consecutive gonadotrophin-stimulated IVF cycles. Hum Reprod 2004; 19:899-904. No decrease in the number of oocytes was found when adjusted for women's age.
16. Al-Azemi M, Bernal AL, Steele J, et al. Ovarian response to repeated controlled stimulation in in-vitro fertilization cycles in patients with ovarian endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:72-75.
17. Caligara C, Navarro J, Vargas G, et al. The effect of repeated controlled ovarian stimulation in donors. Hum Reprod 2001; 16:2320-2323.
18. Klinkert ER, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW, et al. Expected poor responders on the basis of an antral follicle count do not benefit from a higher starting dose of gonadotrophins in IVF treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod; 23 December 2004 [Epub ahead of print].
19. Gobert B, Barbarino-Monnier P, Guillet-May F, et al. Anti-ovary antibodies after attempts at human in vitro fertilization induced by follicular puncture rather than hormonal stimulation. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 96:213-218.
20. Monnier-Barbarino P, Jouan C, Dubois M, et al. [Anti-ovarian antibodies and in vitro fertilization: cause or consequence?]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2003; 31:770-773.
21. Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Mol BW, et al. Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2003; 79:1091-1100.
22. Hendriks DJ, Broekmans FJ, Bancsi LF, et al. Repeated clomiphene citrate challenge testing in the prediction of outcome in IVF: a comparison with basal markers for ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:163-169.
23. Weenen C, Laven JS, Von Bergh AR, Cranfield et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone expression pattern in the human ovary: potential implications for initial and cyclic follicle recruitment. Mol Hum Reprod 2004; 10:77-83.
24. Gruijters MJ, Visser JA, Durlinger AL, Themmen AP. Anti-Mullerian hormone and its role in ovarian function. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2003; 211:85-90.